(YR4.6) Module YG3 Annex 7L Romulan YFA - There should be a towing listing for the YFA. - Ken Kazinski, 22 Dec 2025.

By Ken Kazinski (Kjkazinski) on Wednesday, December 31, 2025 - 01:46 pm: Edit

Annex 3 Module YG3 Annex 3 Notes - For units that operate medium bombers the "B" should be "BM" to distinguish it from the heavy bomber note. - Ken Kazinski, 22 Dec 2025.

Annex 7H Module YG3 - As the title of the annex is "Masking Device Energy Cost", all the references to cloaking device should be masking/veiling device. - Ken Kazinski, 25 Dec 2025.

Annex 7H Module YG3 - The reference to (G13.2) should be (YG13.2). - Ken Kazinski, 25 Dec 2025.

(YR4.11) Module YG3 Annex 3A Romulan FRT - There is no listing in Annex 3A for the FRT. - Ken Kazinski, 24 Dec 2025.

(YR4.13) Module YG3 Romulan RHB - Per the unit descriptions in Y3 and MSSB-R04 the unit type should be RHB-M. - Ken Kazinski, 24 Dec 2025.

(YR4.13) Module YG3 Romulan RHB-M - By convention the Shuttle Text of '0+1H' should just be '1H' when there are no fighters. - Ken Kazinski, 24 Dec 2025.

(YR4.14) Module YG3 Romulan RHB-S - By convention the Shuttle Text of '0+1H' should just be '1H' when there are no fighters. - Ken Kazinski, 24 Dec 2025.

(YR4.15) Module YG3 Romulan RFGB-S - By convention the Shuttle Text of '0+1H' should just be '1H' when there are no fighters. - Ken Kazinski, 24 Dec 2025.

(1.1-4A) Module YG3 Romulan SDK - Per the Module Y1 SSD (pg 35) and convention for General units, the rule number should be YR1.1-4A. - Ken Kazinski, 24 Dec 2025.

(1.1-4B) Module YG3 Romulan WDK - Per the Module Y1 SSD (pg 35) and convention for General units, the rule number should be YR1.1-4B. - Ken Kazinski, 24 Dec 2025.

(1.1-4C) Module YG3 Romulan YDK - Per the Module Y1 SSD (pg 35) and convention for General units, the rule number should be YR1.1-4C. - Ken Kazinski, 24 Dec 2025.

(1.1-4D) Module YG3 Romulan EDK - Per the Module Y1 SSD (pg 35) and convention for General units, the rule number should be YR1.1-4D. - Ken Kazinski, 24 Dec 2025.

(1.3-4A) Module YG3 Romulan SCBS - Per the Module Y2 SSD (pg 2) and convention for General units, the rule number should be YR1.3A-4A. - Ken Kazinski, 29 Dec 2025.

(1.3-4A) Module YG3 Romulan SCBS - The Product Where Published should be Y2 and not Y1. - Ken Kazinski, 29 Dec 2025.

(1.3-4B) Module YG3 Romulan WCBS - Per the Module Y2 SSD (pg 2) and convention for General units, the rule number should be YR1.3A-4B. - Ken Kazinski, 29 Dec 2025.

(1.3-4B) Module YG3 Romulan WCBS - The Product Where Published should be Y2 and not Y1. - Ken Kazinski, 29 Dec 2025.

(1.3-4C) Module YG3 Romulan CBSY - Per the Module Y2 SSD (pg 2) and convention for General units, the rule number should be YR1.3A-4C. - Ken Kazinski, 29 Dec 2025.

(1.3-4C) Module YG3 Romulan CBSY - The Product Where Published should be Y2 and not Y1. - Ken Kazinski, 29 Dec 2025.

(1.3-4D) Module YG3 Romulan ECBS - Per the Module Y2 SSD (pg 2) and convention for General units, the rule number should be YR1.3A-4D. - Ken Kazinski, 29 Dec 2025.

(1.3-4D) Module YG3 Romulan ECBS - The Product Where Published should be Y2 and not Y1. - Ken Kazinski, 29 Dec 2025.

(YR4.17) Module YG3 Romulan RHFM - - Ken Kazinski, 29 Dec 2025.

By Ken Kazinski (Kjkazinski) on Sunday, January 11, 2026 - 05:48 pm: Edit

(YR5.5) Module YG3 Kzinti YCC - The BPV in YG3 is listed as 80, but Y1 SSD (pg 40) is listed as 81. - Ken Kazinski, 04 Jan 2026.

(YR5.7) Module YG3 Kzinti YFF - The BPV in YG3 is listed as 45, but Y1 SSD (pg 42) is listed as 41. - Ken Kazinski, 04 Jan 2026.

(R5.13) Module YG3 Kzinti P-C1 - Should not the pod be in group "Kzinti Tug Pods"? and not "Kzinti Early Years Pods"? - Ken Kazinski, 06 Jan 2026.

(YR5.11) Module YG3 Kzinti WDN - Per (FD3.0) "Drone rack types A, B, C, D, and F were in service inY65." but the YIS for this unit is Y64. The YIS for this unit should be Y65. - Ken Kazinski, 10 Jan 2026.

Annex #10 Module YG3 Kzinti Tug - The list for Tug is "WCA, WCI, WCC, WSR, WSI, YTG, WTG." but not all these units are tugs. Should there be another listing for the WCA? The Tug listing would be "YTG, WTG" and the WCA listing would be "WCA, WCI, WCC, WSR, WSI". - Ken Kazinski, 10 Jan 2026.

(YR5.2) Module YG3 Kzinti WCA - Per (FD3.0) "Drone rack types A, B, C, D, and F were in service inY65." but the YIS for this unit is Y64. The YIS for this unit should be Y65. - Ken Kazinski, 10 Jan 2026.

(YR5.22) Module YG3 Kzinti WCL - Per (FD3.0) "Drone rack types A, B, C, D, and F were in service inY65." but the YIS for this unit is Y64. The YIS for this unit should be Y65. - Ken Kazinski, 10 Jan 2026.

(YR5.3) Module YG3 Kzinti WDD - Per (FD3.0) "Drone rack types A, B, C, D, and F were in service inY65." but the YIS for this unit is Y64. The YIS for this unit should be Y65. - Ken Kazinski, 11 Jan 2026.

(YR5.3A) Module YG3 Kzinti WDI - The rule number is listed as "YR5.3" but should be "YR5.3A". - Ken Kazinski, 11 Jan 2026.

(YR5.3A) Module YG3 Kzinti WDI - Captain's Log 21 stated the BPV should be 45 but YG3 lists 38. Looking at other ships that have the (YR5.R1) Improved Warp Refit, when adding the four warp boxes the BPV only went up by 2 points. Should not the BPV 38 as listed in YG3. - Ken Kazinski, 11 Jan 2026.

(YR5.8A) Module YG3 Kzinti WTG - Per (FD3.0) "Drone rack types A, B, C, D, and F were in service inY65." but the YIS for this unit is Y64. The YIS for this unit should be Y65. - Ken Kazinski, 11 Jan 2026.

By Ken Kazinski (Kjkazinski) on Tuesday, February 03, 2026 - 09:50 pm: Edit

(YR6.14) Module YG3 Gorn YDN+ - Possibly change the rule for the YDN+ to YR6.14A and update MSSB-R6 YR6.14 to split the rule into pre-Y105 and post-Y105 refit. - Ken Kazinski, 16 Jan 2026.

(YR6.6) Module YG3 Gorn YCC+ - Possibly change the rule for the YCC+ to YR6.6A and update MSSB-R6 YR6.6 to split the rule into pre-Y105 and post-Y105 refit. - Ken Kazinski, 16 Jan 2026.

(YR6.5) Module YG3 Gorn YCL+ - Possibly change the rule for the YCL+ to YR6.5A and update MSSB-R6 YR6.5 to split the rule into pre-Y105 and post-Y105 refit. - Ken Kazinski, 16 Jan 2026.

(YR6.7) Module YG3 Gorn YDD+ - Possibly change the rule for the YDD+ to YR6.7A and update MSSB-R6 YR6.7 to split the rule into pre-Y105 and post-Y105 refit. - Ken Kazinski, 17 Jan 2026.

(YR6.8) Module YG3 Gorn YFF+ - Should not the Gorn Y105 plasma bolt refit cost be 2, [Pl-F Bolt (2.5) rounded] and not the shown cost of 3, making the the YFF+ BPV 34 and not 35? - Ken Kazinski, 17 Jan 2026.

(YR6.8) Module YG3 Gorn YFF+ - Possibly change the rule for the YFF+ to YR6.7A and update MSSB-R6 YR6.8 to split the rule into pre-Y105 and post-Y105 refit. - Ken Kazinski, 17 Jan 2026.

(R6.6) Module YG3 Gorn P-C - The rule should show the rule in MSSB-R06, (YR6.18A), update Rule Nbr to "R6.6/YR6.18A". - Ken Kazinski, 18 Jan 2026.

(YR6.2) Module YG3 Gorn WBB - Per CL22, the BPVs for Gorn Warp-Refitted Battleship is different between the Y1 MSC and the SSD, the SSD has the correct BPV of 48. - Ken Kazinski, 18 Jan 2026.

(YR6.10) Module YG3 Gorn WBI+ - Possibly change the rule for the WBI+ to YR6.10B and update MSSB-R6 YR6.10 to split the rule into pre-Y105 and post-Y105 refit. - Ken Kazinski, 17 Jan 2026.

(YR6.13) Module YG3 Gorn WCG - This unit should have a "T" note. - Ken Kazinski, 20 Jan 2026.

(YR6.13A) Module YG3 Gorn WCL - This unit should have a "T" note. - Ken Kazinski, 20 Jan 2026.

(YR6.12A) Module YG3 Gorn WDL - Should not the year in service be 66 and not 68? Other laser, bolted plasma units (WAL, WCL, WSR, WDD, etc.) all have a year in service of 66, which is prior to the phaser version. - Ken Kazinski, 25 Jan 2026.

(1.1-6A) Module YG3 Gorn SDK - By convention the rule should be listed as "YR1.1-6A". Also, to match the Romulan YR1.1 paradigm, should the rule be updated to YR1.1A-6? - Ken Kazinski, 25 Jan 2026.

(1.1-6B) Module YG3 Gorn SDL - By convention the rule should be listed as "YR1.1-6B". Also, to match the Romulan YR1.1 paradigm, should the rule be updated to YR1.1B-6? - Ken Kazinski, 25 Jan 2026.

(1.1-6C) Module YG3 Gorn SDI - By convention the rule should be listed as "YR1.1-6C". Also, to match the Romulan YR1.1 paradigm, should the rule be updated to YR1.1C-6? - Ken Kazinski, 25 Jan 2026.

(1.1-6D) Module YG3 Gorn EDK - By convention the rule should be listed as "YR1.1-6D". Also, to match the Romulan YR1.1 paradigm, should the rule be updated to YR1.1D-6? - Ken Kazinski, 25 Jan 2026.

(1.1-6E) Module YG3 Gorn YDK - By convention the rule should be listed as "YR1.1-6E". Also, to match the Romulan YR1.1 paradigm, should the rule be updated to YR1.1E-6? - Ken Kazinski, 25 Jan 2026.

(YR1.1-6F) Module YG3 Gorn YDK+ - The YDK+ is missing from Annex 3. - Ken Kazinski, 25 Jan 2026.

By Ken Kazinski (Kjkazinski) on Sunday, October 12, 2025 - 04:34 pm: Edit

Annex 3 Module YG3 - General YGBDFR - The Y66 listing should have a Laser and No Cloak note. - Ken Kazinski, 11 Oct 2025.

Annex 3 Module YG3 - General YGBDFR - The Y89 listing should have a No Cloak note. - Ken Kazinski, 11 Oct 2025.

Annex 3 Module YG3 - General YGBDGR - The Y66 listing should have a Laseer note and a No Cloak note. - Ken Kazinski, 11 Oct 2025.

Annex 3 Module YG3 - General YGBDGR - The Y89 listing should have a No Cloak note. - Ken Kazinski, 11 Oct 2025.

Annex 3 Module YG3 - General YGBDFG - Based on (YR1.8F7) should not the phaser unit YIS be Y70 and not Y71. - Ken Kazinski, 11 Oct 2025.

By Ken Kazinski (Kjkazinski) on Sunday, October 26, 2025 - 07:23 pm: Edit

Annex 3 Module YG3 General YGBDWTL - Should not there be a laser note? - Ken Kazinski, 21 Oct 2025.

Annex 3 Module YG3 General YGBDQ - Should not there be a laser note? - Ken Kazinski, 21 Oct 2025.

Annex 3 Module YG3 General BarM - Should not the ship type be YBarM? This would allow people not to confuse the unit with the non-early years version and be similiar to what was done for early years shuttles. - Ken Kazinski, 21 Oct 2025.

Annex 3 Module YG3 General YCarM - Should not the ship type be YCarM? This would allow people not to confuse the unit with the non-early years version and be similiar to what was done for early years shuttles. - Ken Kazinski, 21 Oct 2025.

Annex 3 Module YG3 General HBM - Should not the ship type be YHBM? This would allow people not to confuse the unit with the non-early years version and be similiar to what was done for early years shuttles. - Ken Kazinski, 21 Oct 2025.

Annex 3 Module YG3 General HosM - Should not the ship type be YHosM? This would allow people not to confuse the unit with the non-early years version and be similiar to what was done for early years shuttles. - Ken Kazinski, 21 Oct 2025.

Annex 3 Module YG3 General PAM - Should not the ship type be YPAM? This would allow people not to confuse the unit with the non-early years version and be similiar to what was done for early years shuttles. - Ken Kazinski, 21 Oct 2025.

Annex 3 Module YG3 General SciM - Should not the ship type be YSciM? This would allow people not to confuse the unit with the non-early years version and be similiar to what was done for early years shuttles. - Ken Kazinski, 21 Oct 2025.

Annex 3 Module YG3 General VIPM - Should not the ship type be YVIPM? This would allow people not to confuse the unit with the non-early years version and be similiar to what was done for early years shuttles. - Ken Kazinski, 21 Oct 2025.

By Ken Kazinski (Kjkazinski) on Wednesday, November 19, 2025 - 08:49 pm: Edit

(YR2.34) Module YG3 Federation YBB Scr - As the YBB is from module Y3 should not the product where published be Y3 and not Y1? - Ken Kazinski, 17 Nov 2025.

(YR2.34) Module YG3 Federation YBB Scr - Should not the N4 note be included? N4 - Lower ratings for docking points, explosion strength, and command rating are used if the warp engine is dropped. - Ken Kazinski, 17 Nov 2025.

(YR2.34) Module YG3 Federation YBB SS - As the YBB is from module Y3 should not the product where published be Y3 and not Y1? - Ken Kazinski, 17 Nov 2025.

(YR2.6) Module YG3 Federation YDN Scr - Should not the N4 note be included? N4 - Lower ratings for docking points, explosion strength, and command rating are used if the warp engine is dropped. - Ken Kazinski, 17 Nov 2025.

Annex 10 Module YG3 Federation YDN-Scr, should be YDN Scr per Annex 3 (page 9). - Ken Kazinski, 17 Nov 2025.

Annex 10 Module YG3 - The hull type YBB-Scr text is "YBB Scr, YBB SS." and the hull type "YC-Scr" text is "Any YBB, YDN, YCA, YCC, YDD, YTG saucer without warp engines." Should not the "YBB" be removed from the "YC-Scr"? - Ken Kazinski, 17 Nov 2025.

Annex 10 Module YG3 Federation YCC Scr - The Product Where Published should be Y2, same as the YCC. - Ken Kazinski, 17 Nov 2025.

(YR2.20) Module YG3 Federation YCM - Per the landing paragraph "The ship can land on planets using the powered landing system (P2.434) (other early light cruisers cannot) and has the crash landing bonus (P2.4311)." There should be "PL" and "LB" notes. - Ken Kazinski, 13 Nov 2025.

By Ken Kazinski (Kjkazinski) on Saturday, November 29, 2025 - 04:38 pm: Edit

(YR3.5) Module YG3 Klingon F4 - The F4 SSD from SL85 (pg 1) shows the BPV as 48; CL18 (pg 98) shows the BPV as 53; module Y1 (pg 24) show the BPV to be 53. The BPV listed in YG3 is 45, but should be 53. - Ken Kazinski, 29 Nov 2025.

(YR3.22) Module YG3 Klingon F4J - The unit's YIS (75) is before the Klingon F4 (Y78) which this unit is it a variant of. Either the YIS for the F4 should be updated to Y75 or the YIS for the F4J should be Y78. - Ken Kazinski, 29 Nov 2025.

By Ken Kazinski (Kjkazinski) on Saturday, November 29, 2025 - 09:10 pm: Edit

(R3.11) Module YG3 Klingon P-C1 - The Product Where Published should be AM and not BS. See Advanced Missions, pg 109 and Advanced Missions SSD, pg 52. - Ken Kazinski, 29 Nov 2025.

Annex 3 Module YG3 - Based on (YR1.8F6), the Gorn, Bolt, Phaser unit's YIS should be Y70 and not Y71. Should not the Y104 Gorn only entry be Y105? - Ken Kazinski, 11 Oct 2025.

By Ken Kazinski (Kjkazinski) on Sunday, December 07, 2025 - 07:51 am: Edit

(YR3.5) Module YG3 Klingon F4-Bm - The F4-Bm is missing from the Klingon Early Years Separted Boom Sections. - Ken Kazinski, 06 Dec 2025.

(YR3.3) Module YG3 Klingon F3-Bm - There is no entry for the F3-Bm. - Ken Kazinski, 06 Dec 2025.

(YR3.6) Module YG3 Klingon F5-Bm - There is no entry for the F5-Bm or the F5J-Bm. Moidule D3 has an SSD for F-Boom. - Ken Kazinski, 06 Dec 2025.

(YR3.64) Module YG3 Klingon F6-Bm - There is no entry for the F6-Bm or the F6J-Bm. - Ken Kazinski, 06 Dec 2025.

(YR3.64) Module YG3 Klingon F6-BmS - There is no entry for the F6-BmS or the F6J-BmS. - Ken Kazinski, 06 Dec 2025.

(YR3.J0) Module YG3 Klingon FB10-Bm - There is no entry for the FB10-Bm or the FB10-BmS. - Ken Kazinski, 06 Dec 2025.

(YR3.7) Module YG3 Klingon T4-Bm - The number of boarding parties should be 3 and not 4. The T4 Tug only has 3 boarding parties. - Ken Kazinski, 06 Dec 2025.

By Ken Kazinski (Kjkazinski) on Sunday, December 14, 2025 - 09:07 am: Edit

Annex 10 Module YG3 Klingon F3J-Bm - There is no Tactical Information Group for the F3J-Bm (YR3.14). Possibly add an entry "F3-Boom" to Annex 10. - Ken Kazinski, 12 Dec 2025.

Annex 10 Module YG3 Klingon F4-Bm - There is no Tactical Information Group for the F4-Bm (YR3.5) and F4J-Bm (YR3.5). Possibly add an entry "F4-Boom" to Annex 10. - Ken Kazinski, 12 Dec 2025.

By Ken Kazinski (Kjkazinski) on Sunday, December 21, 2025 - 10:50 am: Edit

(YR4.2E) Module YG3 Romulan VUL+ - This unit is missing from Annex 3. - Ken Kazinski, 17 Dec 2025.

(YR4.8A) Module YG3 Romulan SLKB SSD - The YIS on the SSD is Y66, but Annex 3 shows Y70. - Ken Kazinski, 18 Dec 2025.

(YR4.9A) Module YG3 Romulan SWBF SSD - The YIS on the SSD is Y66, but Annex 3 shows Y70. - Ken Kazinski, 20 Dec 2025.

(YR4.10A) Module YG3 Romulan SWBC SSD - The YIS on the SSD is Y66, but Annex 3 shows Y70. - Ken Kazinski, 20 Dec 2025.

By Steve Cole (Stevecole) on Monday, June 01, 2026 - 05:20 pm: Edit

(YR2.4) Module YG3 - Federation YCA - YG3 shows the BPV to be 82, but should be 84 per the Y1 SSD, page 5. - Ken Kazinski, 08 Nov 2025.

(YR2.4) Module YG3 - Federation YCA - YG3 shows the Rule Number to be YR2.3, but should be YR2.4 per the Y1 SSD, page 5. - Ken Kazinski, 08 Nov 2025.

By Ken Kazinski (Kjkazinski) on Monday, June 01, 2026 - 08:35 pm: Edit

(YR2.2) Module YG3 - Federation WCL - The BPV in Annex 3 is listed at 48, but the SSD shows 57. - Ken Kazinski 21 Nov 2025.

(YR2.2) Module YG3 - Federation WCL - Should not "Y50" be Y62 in "Hulls of this class remained in production from Y50 through Y170," or should the YIS for this unit be Y50? If it is Y50 then there will need to be updates on the systems for the earlier YIS. - Ken Kazinski 21 Nov 2025.

(YR2.19) Module YG3 - Federation WCM - Per "powered landing system (P2.434) (other warp-refitted light cruisers cannot) and has the crash landing bonus (P2.4311)." should not this unit have the PL and LB note. - Ken Kazinski, 21 Nov 2025.

(YR2.19) Module YG3 - Federation WCM - Should not "crash landing" be "crash-landing" in "crash landing bonus (P2.4311)."? - Ken Kazinski, 21 Nov 2025.

(YR2.47) Module YG3 Federation (Vulcan) WVCC - The YIS is listed as Y74 but the ship description states "The Vulcans completed one ship of this type in Y71". Should not the YIS for this unit should be Y71. - Ken Kazinski, 25 Nov 2025.

(YR2.12) Module YG3 Federation (Vulcan) VDI - The BPV is listed as 44 and should be 49 per CL21 which states "The larger engines represent a later upgrade (VDI) with a BPV of 49 which became available from Y80." - Ken Kazinski, 25 Nov 2025.

By Steve Cole (Stevecole) on Monday, June 01, 2026 - 10:12 pm: Edit

(YR2.2) Module YG3 - Federation WCL - The BPV in Annex 3 is listed at 48, but the SSD shows 57. - Ken Kazinski 21 Nov 2025.

(YR2.2) Module YG3 - Federation WCL - Should not "Y50" be Y62 in "Hulls of this class remained in production from Y50 through Y170," or should the YIS for this unit be Y50? If it is Y50 then there will need to be updates on the systems for the earlier YIS. - Ken Kazinski 21 Nov 2025.

(YR2.19) Module YG3 - Federation WCM - Per "powered landing system (P2.434) (other warp-refitted light cruisers cannot) and has the crash landing bonus (P2.4311)." should not this unit have the PL and LB note. - Ken Kazinski, 21 Nov 2025.

(YR2.19) Module YG3 - Federation WCM - Should not "crash landing" be "crash-landing" in "crash landing bonus (P2.4311)."? - Ken Kazinski, 21 Nov 2025.

By Steve Cole (Stevecole) on Monday, June 01, 2026 - 10:37 pm: Edit

(YR2.47) Module YG3 Federation (Vulcan) WVCC - The YIS is listed as Y74 but the ship description states "The Vulcans completed one ship of this type in Y71". Should not the YIS for this unit should be Y71. - Ken Kazinski, 25 Nov 2025.

(YR2.12) Module YG3 Federation (Vulcan) VDI - The BPV is listed as 44 and should be 49 per CL21 which states "The larger engines represent a later upgrade (VDI) with a BPV of 49 which became available from Y80." - Ken Kazinski, 25 Nov 2025.