| Subtopic | Posts | Updated | ||
| Archive through February 21, 2020 | 25 | 02/24 03:03pm | |
| Archive through March 25, 2020 | 25 | 03/26 04:44am |
| By Will McCammon (Djdood) on Wednesday, March 25, 2020 - 09:07 pm: Edit |
The C7 and C8/9 do not have external sensor dishes.
| By AW Cookson (Awcookson) on Wednesday, March 25, 2020 - 11:01 pm: Edit |
Neither did the D7. I was suggesting to save the external sensor dish for the CX hulls if we want to trace a design linage.
| By Will McCammon (Djdood) on Wednesday, March 25, 2020 - 11:55 pm: Edit |
I am unfamiliar with a CX hull design lineage.
Tonight, I made the sensor a little less tall and moved it up a little bit higher on the boom of the DX. However, the interaction of shapes limits what can be done and I built it with a certain look in mind, so there will be no wholesale change (like an internal dish) unless SVC directs it.
| By A David Merritt (Adm) on Thursday, March 26, 2020 - 12:05 am: Edit |
I had to go look, its the conjectural C5X Raiding Dreadnought.
| By AW Cookson (Awcookson) on Thursday, March 26, 2020 - 04:44 am: Edit |
Will, what I was trying to say is when you noted, "Having it forward like it is was a nod to the fully externally-mounted dish on the B-10" is an interesting thought, but I'd rather see it done on the C & B hulls and not a D hull as none of the earlier D hulls had an external sensor.
If the pod were restored, instead of if having the undercut, the sensor could be a surface detail of the pod and neither recessed or extended.
Just my opinion but I think that would look better and stay with the D hull look.
| By Steve Cole (Stevecole) on Thursday, March 26, 2020 - 10:01 am: Edit |
I have left it up to Will how to handle the input from this topic. He can send the ship to Jean when he is satisfied.
| By Will McCammon (Djdood) on Thursday, March 26, 2020 - 01:35 pm: Edit |
I have another evening's work left to complete the "K" Aztec paneling. Ideally, I upload it tonight.
| By Lawrence Bergen (Lar) on Thursday, March 26, 2020 - 08:13 pm: Edit |
Did anyone answer MarkH 3/24 question about phasers clearing the understrakes? They are definitely lower than the phaser bumps but may be over far enough that the space also blocked traditionally by the engine drops have it covered within the traditional arc.
| By Steve Cole (Stevecole) on Friday, March 27, 2020 - 04:00 pm: Edit |
Will told me he had it taken care of.
| By Lawrence Bergen (Lar) on Saturday, March 28, 2020 - 08:24 pm: Edit |
10-4
| Administrator's Control Panel -- Board Moderators Only Administer Page | Delete Conversation | Close Conversation | Move Conversation |