F&E 2010 REVISION ONE
=
Joel has just uploaded the errata pages for the F&E 2010 Revision-0 rulebook. The F&E staff worked night and day for the last two weeks to make sure we found everything of any real significance. Staffers were assigned to check 2010 vs 2000 rule by rule looking for missing rules, and to hand-check every cross reference in 2010. While the staffers do most of the checking on any book, only ADB, Inc., is responsible for items found after the books are printed.
=
We regret that no matter how much work goes into any book before the presses roll, some things are not found until the pressure of a looming deadline is gone. It is our practice to work with customers who buy the first print runs of a new product to find everything we missed, and to ensure that these earlier purchasers have a great product.
=
There are standard print and large print versions located here:
http://www.starfleetgames.com/sfb/errata/erratoc.shtml#fne
=
There are about a page and a half of line items, 90% of which are just improved or corrected cross references. There are some significant errors.
=
1. The Sequence of Play has been updated to match the Step numbers in the Planetary Operations version. The updated version is included in the errata page file.
=
2. Jean Sexton updated the Index, correcting many errors which had gone unreported for a decade. The updated version is included in the errata page file.
=
3. Rule 203.55 did not match the examples in the 2000 or 2010-R0 rulebooks (the examples were right) and was fixed in Revision-1.
=
4. The Gorn off-map fleet activation rule (506.5) was left out of the Revision-0 rulebook and is included in Revision-1.
=
5. Pod data was left out of Revision-0 but is included in the errata page files and in Revision-1.
=
There are some other minor errors, such as are listed in the errata page file under (432.24), (509.1A), (509.1B), (511.52), (515.53), (602.42), (602.43), and (70x.3).
=
Also, some players asked that we provide replacement pages to separate rules 512 and 515 so you can integrate the expansions. Such pages are in the Revision-1 rulebook and in the errata page file. (The large print edition does not have this problem.)
=
New Revision-1 rulebooks began printing today (19 March 2010) including corrections of all of the listed items, plus a small number of obvious but unlisted typographical errors.
=
Uploading the errata page files fulfills our obligation to keep any product you buy from us up to date, but we will go farther. If you bought a 2010-Revision-0 rulebook (or get one in a store-bought boxed game you buy months from now), you have three options.
A: Download the errata page file. Print it out, and put it with your rulebook. Make a small colored mark next to each rule in the rulebook which has a line item so that you will know to check the errata page file.
B: We will provide anyone who bought a Revision-0 rulebook with a replacement Revision-1 rulebook at our cost, which is $4 for the book plus the cost of shipping ($5.95 for a priority mail envelope, or added to your next order at no shipping cost).
C: We will print the key replacement pages (there are about 30 of these, the ones with significant errors, not just cross reference items) and provide them to you for our cost which is $1.50 (plus postage, or added to your next order for no shipping cost).
=
While ADB, Inc., wishes that we had managed to produce a perfect book on the first try we knew that goal was a high one. It is still one that we regret missing. What matters to us is that you, our customers and fans, are satisfied with your purchase, and we hope that one of these options will accomplish that.

By Steve Cole (Stevecole) on Friday, March 19, 2010 - 05:41 pm: Edit

These issues were found in the F&E2010-Revision 0 rulebook and were fixed in the F&E2010-Revision 1 rulebook. Some obvious typographical errors were also corrected but are not listed here. The F&E2010-Revision 1 rulebook was printed from 19 March 2010 and each page is marked with a small H beside the page number.

(000) Table of Contents: Add 656 Federation Early War.
(102.0) COMBAT POTENTIAL: Reference to (302.4) should be (302.41).
(102.0) STARBASE: Reference to (433.1) should be (433.11).
(103.3) D, DD: Reference to (540.0) should be (540.3).
(105.0) While the Sequence of Play in 2010-R0 was perfectly workable, it varied in some places with the Master Sequence of Play in Planetary Operations and was updated to that standard in 2010-R1. Step 11H reference to (503.34) should be (504.34). Scuttling (301.9) is done in new Steps 2B11 and 5-6X9.
(203.48) The second reference to (421.21) should be to (203.45).
(203.55) Pinning Exception: This rule incorrectly states that all of the moving ships must be pinned for the exception to be used. This is not true (the examples are correct) and the exception is used in every case.
(203.8) Reference to (504.1) should (504.23).
(204.37) Overloaded Tugs reference should be (517.44).
(204.37) Swarms should refer to (514.41) not (514.45).
(204.37) Troop Transports reference (520.61) should be (521.61).
(208.0) Many of these references were improved in 2010-R1. Auxillary Carriers (513.13). Auxillary Drone Bombardment Ships (526.52). Marine Major Generals (321.2). Monitors (519.3). Raids-Military (314.2). Special Attack Forces (520.2). Swarms (514.4). X-ships (523.2).
(301.81) Delete “SAFs‡” from the list.
(301.91) See SoP steps 2B11 and 5-6X9.
(302.11) Second paragraph reference to X-Ships should be (523.36).
(302.321) Reference to (308.23) should be (305.23).
(302.721) “Residual Defense Unit” should be “Residual Defense Factor”.
(302.721) Reference to (302.74) should be (302.742).
(302.742B) In the last sentence “let them retrograde” should be “let them retreat”.
(302.761) The various “steps” in this rule should be “priorities.”
(305.0) These modifiers are not cumulative.
(305.233) Rule (654.2) is not an expansion rule but is part of the base 2010 rules.
(306.13) Reference to (308.111) can be ignored.
(306.22) Single combat should be small-scale combat.
(306.3) Sub-Step 2A (302.22).
(307.11) Add reference “Withdrawal Before Combat (302.1).
(308.1213) Add Exception see, FCR‡ (526.353).
(308.41) First sentence, “the the” should be “if the”.
(308.84) SIDS directed damage is 18 points , not the 9 shown.
(308.863) STB: 6 SIDS to cripple, 3 more to destroy.
(309.0) See the SIT, not (755.0).
(310.43) “Troop unit” should be “ground combat ship”.
(310.463) Honor Duel reference (528.42) should be (528.43).
(310.471) Reference should be (525.74B).
(310.474) Reference (323.11) should be (310.11)
(413.442) Reference to (435.3) should be (435.25).
(414.4) Step 2B should read Step 2B3.
(420.432) Reference to (410.41) should be (413.41).
(420.53) Revised Text: Units can move by Operational or Strategic Movement on the turn they are repaired. See (204.313) which defines and limits free Strategic Movement for repaired units.
(421.22) Reference to (204.3) should be (204.37).
(422.11) Reference to (105.0) Step 7 should read (105.0) Phase 7.
(422.3) Reference to (105.0) Step 7 should read (105.0) Phase 7.
(422.82) Reference to (105.0) Step 7 should read (105.0) Phase 7.
(430.14) Commercial Convoys should be (443.0). Special Operations (four places) should be Strategic Operations. XTP should be (523.12).
(431.23) Base station (440.0) should be (444.0), STB (451.0) should be (452.0).
(431.51) See (442.53) in AO for late war, starbase war destroyer production‡.
(431.734) AH is replaced by an HN or CU, not a CR
(432.24) RN example should be 16.5 not 17.
(432.24) The Hydran CVE should be 2.5+1+6.
(432.42) Reference (751.0) should be to (752.0) or the SITs. See (600.2) for PF deployment.
(432.5) See (502.96) for F-15s.
(433.21) See the SITs, not (751.0).
(433.31) Lyrans cannot build maulers until Y170.
(502.65) Fed PFT service date is Fall Y181.
(502.93) See also (518.46)‡.
(502.943) Spare fighters are replaced at the end of the Retrograde Phase, not the Combat Round.
(503.63) Reference (504.25) should be (540.25).
(506.5) The Gorns have six ships off-map. These are: #1 CL #2 CL #3 DD #4 DD #5 SC #6 TG Each turn when at full war, roll one die in the Production Phase. If the result matches the number of a ship above which has not been previously released, that ship is released and allowed to enter the map by Operational Movement. The Gorn player must pay 2EPs for this ship as it has not previously been refitted, but no conversion slot is used. Obviously, no more than six ships will be received and some of the six may never be activated.
(508.25) The chart in 2010-R0 was made obsolete by the updated rule and was replaced in 2010-R1.
(509.1A) LTTs could use such heavier pods but would be overloaded‡ (517.4).
(509.1B) LTTs could use such heavier pods but would be overloaded‡ (517.4).
(509.1A) Reference to (509.34) should be (509.33).
(509.1L) Reference to (309.0) should be (517.35).
(509.1U) Pay for the drone points when the mission is assigned.
(509.33) The data for the various tug pods of each empire was omitted and is shown on the SIT annex below.
(509.52) The Hydran supply tug can be considered a source of supply for ships retreating in the same force.
(511.33) Also see: Medium Shipyards‡ (450.2).
(511.52) The list of “non-mobile and slow units” did not match 757 and was confusing, so 2010-R1 invented the new term “defense-limited” and defined it as per the original list, minus auxiliaries, leaving hospital ships as defense-limited. The original list included auxiliaries which were designated by the master errata (511.534) as being divided between mobile and static forces.
(512.35) Drone bombardment, see (309.0).
(513.0) Players asked us to separate the pages with rule (512.0) from (515.0) so they could insert expansion rules.
(515.44) See (440.6): Area Control Ships‡ and Division Control Ships‡.
(515.524) Exception: Remus (433.45).
(515.53) Escort conversions are unlimited but DO count against the conversion capacity.
(515.531) Replace reference to 757.1 with SIT.
(600.315) Ships in unreleased fleets can use Strategic Movement inside the fleet’s deployment zone or for (600.32); this counts against the empire’s overall limit.
(600.34) There are two of these, and the first one should be (600.343).
(603.42) Federation NECs with CVS groups should be DEs. The NEC with the CVB is correct.
(603.43) Lyran CVL missing it’s escorts of CWE and DWE. Klingon D6V missing escorts of 2xE4.
(603.5) Should be in white on a black bar.
(605) Turn #26 is Y181 not Y182.
(652.0) See (605.0) should be (605.3).
(652.6) Reference to (603.0) and (605.0) should be to (603.3).
(652.6) Reference to (603.0) should be (603.3).
(653.4G) The six free fighters here are in addition to those added in F&E 2K.
(654.1E) Reference to (431.2) should be (431.21).
(654.1Q) This is “per turn” that Limited War lasts.
(654.2H) Minor shipyards are in (540.1).
(654.2L) Monitor Pallets are (519.4)‡.
(701.0) Reference PDUs (431.2) should be (432.21).
(702.3) Maximum pods allowed: 3xBP, 3xVAP, 3xVP, 1xREP.
(703.3) Maximum pods allowed: 2xBP (pair), 2xPFP (pair), 1xVAP (pair), 3xVP2 (pair), 1xREP.
(704.3) Maximum pods allowed: 1xREP.
(705.0) Kzintis can build a maximum of two drone ships per turn by any means.
(705.3) Maximum pods allowed: 2xBP (pair), 2xPFP (pair), 1xVAP (pair), 3xVP (pair), 1xREP.
(706.3) Maximum pods allowed: 2xHBP+, 2xPFT, 1xREP.
(707.3) Maximum pods allowed: 1xREP.
(709.0) Old Colonies Squadron LC listed the wrong factors. See the SIT.
(709.3) Maximum pods allowed: 2xBP, 2xPFP, 2xVP, 1xREP.
(70x.3) Every empire lists one scout substitution per YEAR (432.41) but this should be per TURN.
(711.3) The Lyrans build their two PFT pods in Fall Y178. Maximum pods allowed: 2xBP+, 2xPFP+, 2xVP+, 1xREP.
(752.0) Fighter Factor on PDU costs 0.5 EPs.
(760.1) Also: STB: Sector Base‡
(900.0) Residual Defense Unit should be Residual Defense Factor.
SIT HYDRAN LC: Should be: 7-9(3)/5(1s).
SIT KLINGON B10: Single Ship Carrier.
SIT THOLIAN BW: For PC: 3.5+8.
SIT THOLIAN CVA: Ignore “Oversized squadron”, a rule not in 2010.
(900.0) Jean found so many mistakes here we did a new index and put it on the website.

By Jean Sexton (Jsexton) on Friday, March 19, 2010 - 10:57 pm: Edit

To take you there directly:

Large Print: http://www.starfleetgames.com/sfb/errata/2010%20Errata%20Page%20LPE.pdf

Regular Print: http://www.starfleetgames.com/sfb/errata/2010%20Errata%20Page.pdf

updated 3/22/10 with corrected links --Jean

By Shayne Demeria (Nighthawk) on Sunday, March 21, 2010 - 07:35 pm: Edit

Not sure if anyone noticed this typo.

Page 23, rule 205.16, 2nd paragraph:

Expending Movement Boints

By Nick Samaras (Koogie) on Tuesday, April 13, 2010 - 09:59 am: Edit

(509.1-P) PF Replacement Tug: 2nd last sentence. A theater transport with the "U" designation can move a troop pod, but that pod cannot have any replacement PFs while being moved.

Troop pod should be PTP pod. (Samaras April 13, 2010).

By Daniel G. Knipfer (Dgknipfer) on Wednesday, April 14, 2010 - 10:16 pm: Edit

Isn't a PTP a PF transport Pod for replacement PFs?

By Nick Samaras (Koogie) on Thursday, April 15, 2010 - 01:01 pm: Edit

Daniel,

Yes, thats why (509.1-P) should not refer to troop pod, that is mission (509.1-N).

By Jeffrey Coutu (Jtc) on Friday, August 13, 2010 - 06:09 am: Edit

F&E 2010 Errata, Misspellings, and Suggestions (about half of the entries below are minor misspellings)
(102.0) CONVOY: Misspelling; change "quantites" to "quantities" Jeff Coutu - 13 AUG 2010
(105.0) 2B3: Misspelling; in the third sentence change "pgrade" to "upgrade". Jeff Coutu - 13 AUG 2010
(105.0) 5-7C: Reference to (307.73) should be (302.73). Jeff Coutu - 13 AUG 2010
(105.0) 5-8F: Reference to (307.73) should be (302.73). Jeff Coutu - 13 AUG 2010
(205.11) The first reference to this rule (the one starting with "ONCE") should be (205.10). Jeff Coutu - 13 AUG 2010
(205.16) Misspelling; in the second paragraph, third word, change "Boints" to "Points". Jeff Coutu - 13 AUG 2010
(206.33) Misspelling; in the second sentence change "Retrogade" to "Retrograde". Jeff Coutu - 13 AUG 2010
(208.0) After Auxiliary Drone Bombardment Ships: (526.52) should be (526.53). Jeff Coutu - 13 AUG 2010
(302.73) Misspelling; in the forth sentence change "prioriy" to "priority". Jeff Coutu - 13 AUG 2010
(302.731) Misspelling; in the fifth sentence change "belligerants" to "belligerents". Jeff Coutu - 13 AUG 2010
(304.5) Misspelling; in the second to last sentence change "satisified" to "satisfied". Jeff Coutu - 13 AUG 2010
(305.231) In the last sentence change "six options below" to "six options of (305.2)". Jeff Coutu - 13 AUG 2010
(305.47) Space missing; in the first sentence change "rules,and" to "rules, and". Jeff Coutu - 13 AUG 2010
(307.32) Misspelling; in the last sentence change "satisy" to "satisfy". Jeff Coutu - 13 AUG 2010
(308.864) Reference to (526.24) should be (526.254). Jeff Coutu - 13 AUG 2010
(309.41) Repeated word; in the first sentence change "be be" to "be". Jeff Coutu - 13 AUG 2010
(413.445) Repeated word; in the first sentence change "Grid grid" to "Grid". Jeff Coutu - 13 AUG 2010
(420.432) Reference to (413.34) should be (413.42). Jeff Coutu - 13 AUG 2010
(421.4) Misspelling; in the second sentence change "cxception" to "exception". Jeff Coutu - 13 AUG 2010
(431.371) Misspelling; first word, change "Acclerated" to "Accelerated". Jeff Coutu - 13 AUG 2010
(502.452) Reference to (302.45) is incorrect. I think it should reference (502.44). Jeff Coutu - 13 AUG 2010
(502.452) Reference to (306.614) should be (302.614). Jeff Coutu - 13 AUG 2010
(503.42) Reference to (302.26) should be (305.26). Jeff Coutu - 13 AUG 2010
(503.42) This rule references (308.131), which was part of the old CEDS rule but has been removed. Suggest changing the end of the last sentence to read "Retrograde Phase (501.51) or the owning player's next Production Phase (501.52).". Jeff Coutu - 13 AUG 2010
(509.0) Misspelling; in the second paragraph, first sentence, change "tranports" to "transports". Jeff Coutu - 13 AUG 2010
(509.0) Misspelling; in the second paragraph, second sentence; change "accomodate" to "accommodate". Jeff Coutu - 13 AUG 2010
(509.0) Misspelling; in the last paragraph, last sentence, change "similiar" to "similar". Jeff Coutu - 13 AUG 2010
(509.1-B) Repeated word; in the second to last sentence change "but but" to "but". Jeff Coutu - 13 AUG 2010
(509.1-D) Reference to (516.2D) should be (516.21D). Jeff Coutu - 13 AUG 2010
(509.1-P) In the second to last sentence change "troop pod" to "PTP pod" since this rule is referring to PF replacement tug. Jeff Coutu - 13 AUG 2010
(509.1-R) Reference to (530.225) should be (530.23). This change is based on the heavy fighter rules in CL #36 pages 86-87 (note that the PDF version available on the web is different than the CL #36 version). Jeff Coutu - 13 AUG 2010
(509.23) Misspelling; in the last paragraph, last sentence, change "missiion" to "mission". Jeff Coutu - 13 AUG 2010
(509.32) Reference to (1G) should be (1F). Jeff Coutu - 13 AUG 2010
(509.32) Misspelling; in the last paragraph, second sentence, change "assignements" to "assignments". Jeff Coutu - 13 AUG 2010
(509.37) Reference to (530.225) should be (530.23). This change is based on the heavy fighter rules in CL #36 pages 86-87 (note that the PDF version available on the web is different than the CL #36 version). Jeff Coutu - 13 AUG 2010
(511.321) Misspelling; in the second sentence change "existance" to "existence". Jeff Coutu - 13 AUG 2010
(511.51) Reference to (208.253) should be (308.253). Jeff Coutu - 13 AUG 2010
(600.0) Change the time period for the Hurricane scenario from "Y173S-Y175S" to "Y173S-Y177F". Jeff Coutu - 13 AUG 2010
(600.35) Misspelling; change "diplmatic" to "diplomatic". Jeff Coutu - 13 AUG 2010
(651.1) Recommend that reference to "Klingon Delivery (652.4)" also be added to this rule since it also applies to the Grand Campaign. Jeff Coutu - 13 AUG 2010
(652.5) Recommend that that last sentence of the last paragraph (stating with "Federation Seventh Fleet" be moved to Federation paragraph above. Jeff Coutu - 13 AUG 2010
(653.5I) Change "CVL" to "[CVL+CLE+EFF]" since the three ships are being converted to a carrier group, not just a carrier. Jeff Coutu - 13 AUG 2010
(653.11L) I believe that this rule is referring to carrier groups, not just the carrier. If so, then change the first "CVL" to "[CVL+CWE+DWE]" and the first "CV" to "[CV+CWE+2FFE]" and change the start of the last sentence from "Allow CV and CVL" to "Allow CV, CVL, CWE, DWE, and FFE". Jeff Coutu - 13 AUG 2010
(654.0) In the second sentence change "concept applies only" to "concept applies" since the concept does not only apply to the Federation. Jeff Coutu - 13 AUG 2010
(654.1F) Misspelling; change "Fouth" to "Fourth". Jeff Coutu - 13 AUG 2010
(600 NOTES ON OTHER SCENARIOS, page 122): (619.0) BACKDRAFT: The description of the scenario is wrong. The scenario is actually a preemptive attack by the Kzintis and Hydrans against the Lyrans. The Klingons then respond. Jeff Coutu - 13 AUG 2010
(900) Pinning, and X-Ships: Change (523.325) to (523.25). Jeff Coutu - 13 AUG 2010
(900) Pods, on Klingon CVT: I think (432.732) should be (509.43). Jeff Coutu - 13 AUG 2010

By James Lowry (Rindis) on Thursday, November 11, 2010 - 05:25 pm: Edit

(433.1) Rule conflict: This states that starbases can make one conversion of three points or less per turn. Then (433.19) states that multiple conversions are possible. I get what's going on, but it will be confusing to new people. I suggest either making the wording in (433.1) more vague and directing to (433.19) for details on 'minor' conversions, or start with defining the 'any combination up to three points' concept and just using (433.19) to define multiple conversions at the major conversion starbase. James Lowry - 11 NOV 2010

By James Lowry (Rindis) on Saturday, November 13, 2010 - 03:12 pm: Edit

(302.563) The phrase "(allowed in Fighter Operations)" is referring to escorting PFTs as allowed in (515.43), which is now in the main rules. James Lowry - 13 NOV 2010

By James Lowry (Rindis) on Friday, November 19, 2010 - 11:47 pm: Edit

(515.0) Introduction to rule is unchanged from FO, talking about 'more flexibility' and 'modifies (308.1)'. (Which is no longer true, with the switch from CEDS to GEDS.) - James Lowry 19 NOV 2010

By Richard Biggs (Richinq) on Tuesday, November 23, 2010 - 02:55 pm: Edit

(606.1) Kzinti Set Up
Hexes 0602 and 1304 have a Kzinti SC but there is no kzinti SC ship so I guess this should SF.

By Ryan Opel (Ryan) on Tuesday, November 23, 2010 - 03:23 pm: Edit

It's the SF.

By Michael J. Sexton (Lb4269) on Saturday, May 28, 2011 - 12:37 pm: Edit

I found the following very minor typo:

"(685.0) Tholian Harrassment: This is a small two-player scenario
published in CL#24. It reflects a peacetime border skirmish
between the Klingons and Federation." Michael J. Sexton 29 May 2011

[Re-posted from F&E General Discussion forum]

By Jean Sexton (Jsexton) on Saturday, May 28, 2011 - 01:59 pm: Edit

Michael, that was a good catch. In light of improving on it, I think that when you report on something in a note, you need to include a little more information so we can find it easier.

If I were reporting it, I would have perhaps used this wording:

p. 149 Scenarios in Captain's Log. (685.0) Tholian Harrassment. Harrassment should be Harassment (delete extra r). Michael J. Sexton 29 May 2011

Still, well done and thank you.

By Michael J. Sexton (Lb4269) on Saturday, May 28, 2011 - 09:41 pm: Edit

Jean, I'm now very amused. I didn't even catch that misspelling as I was looking at it well past midnight.

I had made a separate correction note with full details and a reference. I never saw that this was deleted in the final post because I used a certain bracket to mark it. I assume the web must have thought it was html language or something. Odd. I can see why you'd be confused and hoping for more.

I had been pointing out that the listing in the rulebook shows the scenario as a Fed / Klingon battle when in fact it is a Tholian / Klingon affair and no Feds are involved at all.

p. 149 Scenarios in the Captain's Log (685.0) Tholian Harassment lists sceanrio as Klingon / Federation when should be Klingon / Tholian as per (685.11) in Captain's Log #24 Michael J Sexton 29 May 2011

Something like that work?

By Jean Sexton (Jsexton) on Sunday, May 29, 2011 - 12:03 am: Edit

Michael, you're good!

By John Kollar (Johnedko) on Saturday, August 06, 2011 - 12:53 am: Edit

Okay, can anyone tell me where to post this so the right people see it?

Typo: F&E 2010 rulebook; page 111, (601.162): "purposes of exhaustion but at not at war" - the first 'at' should read 'are'. (second line in paragraph).

-John

By John Kollar (Johnedko) on Sunday, August 07, 2011 - 07:56 am: Edit

(705.3) Pods: reference is made to "three carrier pods, two battle pods at start" - but Kzinti pods are used in pairs, and later are referred to as "3xVP (pair)". Recommend changing first line to: "Pods at start: 3xVP (pair) and 2xBP (paid)" this keeps the same format used later in the rule. John Kollar 8/7/2011

John

By John Kollar (Johnedko) on Monday, August 08, 2011 - 12:35 am: Edit

(703.4) Pods: reference is made to "two battle pods, two carrier pods at start" - but Klingon pods are used in pairs, and later are referred to as "3xVP2 (pair)". Recommend changing first line to: "Pods at start: 2xVP2 (pair) and 2xBP (pair)" this keeps the same format used later in the rule. John Kollar 8/8/2011

John

By Thomas Mathews (Turtle) on Monday, August 08, 2011 - 07:32 am: Edit

(502.51) add the phrase "or a FRD or FRX‡" to the end of the sentence: Using PF modules‡ (441.412), one flotilla of PFs may be based on mobile bases and operational bases‡. FRDs and FRXs may have 1 PF module added to them under (441.433) or (523.45). Thomas Mathews 8 Aug 2011

By Michael Tisdel (Jtisdel) on Thursday, August 11, 2011 - 12:40 pm: Edit

"(900) Tug, Overloaded: 763.0" should reference 517.4

By Stewart W Frazier (Frazikar2) on Thursday, August 11, 2011 - 07:30 pm: Edit

Michael, AO pg 64 - (763.0) is the right place...

By Michael Tisdel (Jtisdel) on Friday, August 12, 2011 - 06:35 pm: Edit

Stewart,
Thanks. I must be missing that page - I withdraw the correction.

By Thomas Mathews (Turtle) on Wednesday, August 17, 2011 - 11:08 am: Edit

(302.73) prioriy should be priority. Misspelled word, add the letter t between the i and y. prioriy is the third word of priority in the rule. Thomas Mathews 17 Aug 2011

(302.731)belligerants should be belligerents. Mispelled word, replace the letter a with the letter e. Thomas Mathews 17 Aug 2011