Where is the AAR for ISC war?

By Thomas Mathews (Turtle) on Wednesday, August 31, 2011 - 01:59 pm: Edit

In the ISC War Topic under the Future Products topic.

By Patrick Sledge (Decius) on Sunday, October 09, 2011 - 12:09 am: Edit

(705.2) First line currently reads "CL can be substituted or DD for CM once per turn". This should change to "CL or DD can be substituted for CM once per turn" for clarity. Patrick Sledge 9 Oct 11

By Patrick Sledge (Decius) on Monday, October 10, 2011 - 10:02 pm: Edit

(601.12) The 4th and 5th lines state "The ships left behind cannot not count non-ship units, slow units, or auxiliaries" This should change to "The ships left behind cannot count non-ship units, slow units, or auxiliaries" to eliminate the double-negative. Patrick Sledge 10 Oct 11

By Thomas Mathews (Turtle) on Sunday, December 18, 2011 - 12:14 pm: Edit

(105.0) Phase 11: 11D: Empires offer bribes to Orions, see (504.33). Reference to (504.33) should be (504.32). Incorrect reference to Orion Pirates and Bribes given. Thomas Mathews 18 Dec 2011

By Thomas Mathews (Turtle) on Monday, March 05, 2012 - 07:12 am: Edit

(308.23) "PFT is crippled or destroyer" should read: "PFT is crippled or destroyed" destroyer should be destroyed, misspelled word. Thomas Mathews 5 Mar 2012

By Jason E. Schaff (Jschaff297061) on Monday, March 05, 2012 - 06:34 pm: Edit

Why do you want to destroy the destroyer!?
(Ducks and runs!)

By Keith D Plymale (Zaarin7) on Friday, March 09, 2012 - 03:25 pm: Edit

I just wanted to say that this rule book in it's formating and indexing and cross notes ought to be used a text book on how to write rule books. I have been in this hobby since 1977 and have read 100's of rule books in that time. Most impressed with product.

By Thomas Mathews (Turtle) on Wednesday, March 28, 2012 - 08:05 am: Edit

(306.21) add note: "The use a cloaked decoy (538.56)‡ modifies the roll by -2." Missing cross reference. Thomas Mathews 28 Mar 2012

By Thomas Mathews (Turtle) on Saturday, March 31, 2012 - 06:06 am: Edit

(105.0) 2B5 Change reference from (433.432) to (433.43). The reference for Romulan modular ships should include both SP Cruisers (433.432) and SK Destroyers (433.433). Thomas Mathews 31 Mar 2012

(105.0) 3B2 Change reference from (433.432) to (433.43). The reference for Romulan modular ships should include both SP Cruisers (433.432) and SK Destroyers (433.433). Thomas Mathews 31 Mar 2012

By Thomas Mathews (Turtle) on Thursday, May 03, 2012 - 07:45 am: Edit

(430.5) Klingon: No off-map areas should read No off-map area. Delete the s at the end of the word areas. Off-map area is singular not plural in this context. Thomas Mathews 3 May 2012

(430.5) Romulan: No off-map areas should read No off-map area. Delete the s at the end of the word areas. Off-map area is singular not plural in this context. Thomas Mathews 3 May 2012

(430.5) Tholian: No off-map areas should read No off-map area. Delete the s at the end of the word areas. Off-map area is singular not plural in this context. Thomas Mathews 3 May 2012

By Thomas Mathews (Turtle) on Wednesday, August 01, 2012 - 11:09 pm: Edit

(206.33) Delete last sentence: "However, ships in a Battle Hex can use Retrogade Movement
even if they did not participate in a battle round." This is redundant. Thomas Mathews 1 Aug 2012

By Kevin Howard (Jarawara) on Thursday, August 02, 2012 - 12:07 am: Edit

But if it were added, it's probably because somebody thought it wasn't redundant. I'd leave it in, just for extra clarity.

By Mike Curtis (Fear) on Friday, September 28, 2012 - 09:50 am: Edit

Typo in rule number: (308.812) is mistyped as (308.112) - MCurtis 28 SEP 12

By Thomas Mathews (Turtle) on Wednesday, January 02, 2013 - 10:19 pm: Edit

(308.243) Penal ships (528.41) are exempted from this limit. Add ‡ betore (528.41) to denote rule in an expansion module. Thomas Mathews 2 Jan 2013

By Chuck Strong (Raider) on Saturday, January 05, 2013 - 12:32 pm: Edit

(509.1-J4) CHANGE TO READ: "Install Base Modules‡". Rationale: F&E uses other modules such as power modules under (441.5). STRONG - 5 Jan 2010

By Thomas Mathews (Turtle) on Wednesday, January 09, 2013 - 11:41 am: Edit

(306.21) add to end of rule: This may be modified to a -2 by the offensive use of a cloaked decoy (538.56).‡ Thomas Mathews 9 Jan 2013

By Keith Plymale (Zaarin7) on Tuesday, October 15, 2013 - 03:24 pm: Edit

I have the revision copy and it indicates on page 2 of the TOC that rule 319 "Offensive Fighter-PF Strikes" and rule 445 "Fighter Storage Depots" came from "FO". My original TOC from FO does not show these two rule numbers nor does any other expansion. And I do have them all and they are integrated.

By Stewart Frazier (Frazikar2) on Tuesday, October 15, 2013 - 09:07 pm: Edit

Keith, you do (or did), those rules are with (602.49) Limited War, pg 16 of FO...

By Keith Plymale (Zaarin7) on Tuesday, October 15, 2013 - 10:04 pm: Edit

I found after seeing your other note. I've made a note in my rule book at the appropriate places where they are. Thank you.

Moderator unless you want to leave that for anybody else who asks you can delete my post on this.

By Thomas Mathews (Turtle) on Sunday, November 24, 2013 - 10:38 am: Edit

As I'm not sure where this belongs:

(603.U13)The Romulans and Gorns would have a starting balance greater than zero (0) if playing with Strategic Operations and Diplomats. See (603.U522). Thomas Mathews 24 Nov 2013

By trent j telenko (Trent_Telenko) on Wednesday, November 27, 2013 - 12:34 pm: Edit

Please note that the 3rd Way CVBG rule 315.6 in Advanced Operations (A.O.) prohibits use of more than 1 CVBG in a battle force.

Plain F&E2010 _does_not_ include the A.O. one CVBG per battleforce restriction of Advanced Operations.

IOW, the Feds can deploy two or more CVBG using the F&E2010 rules set.

This is an extreme example of a legal CVBG battle force in F&E2010:

[CVL + CVE + DE + FFE] (Four ships counting as three command slots)

[CVL + CVE + DE + FFE] (Ditto Above)

[BTV + CVS + DE + DE + FFE] (Five ships counting as four command slots BTV W/O escorts and the CVS with three escorts)

DN+ Command ship.

FFS Battle force scout


This was spotted by players down in the "First Blood" _Reports From The Front_ topic --

Star Fleet Universe Discussion Board:
Federation & Empire:
F&E Reports from the Front:
Active Scenarios:
First Blood

By Thomas Mathews (Turtle) on Wednesday, March 26, 2014 - 10:40 am: Edit

(601.2) Turn #1 Klingons and Hydrans: Reference to (702) should read (702.0) More accurate reference. Thomas Mathews 26 Mar 2014

(601.2) Turn #1 Klingons and Hydrans: Reference to (709) should read (709.0) More accurate reference. Thomas Mathews 26 Mar 2014

By Thomas Mathews (Turtle) on Saturday, May 24, 2014 - 08:22 am: Edit

(105.0) 2B1 add: Roll for Gorn off-map activation (506.5). The Gorn ships require an expenditure of 2 EPs when a given ship is activated. Thomas Mathews 24 May 2014

By Thomas Mathews (Turtle) on Saturday, May 24, 2014 - 11:25 am: Edit

(502.6) add The Kzintis have a partial exception for Heavy Fighters ‡ under (530.213). The Kzintis have the option of keeping heavy fighters deployed under (530.0). Thomas Mathews 24 May 2014