Subtopic	Posts		Updated
	Heavy Hawk Discussion	42		10/21 12:53pm

THINGS DONE
=========
Romulan: Gunboat Flotillas: CPF: Cost (524.112) 3 The cost listed under (524.112) specifically states that a causual PF group costs 3 EPs. Thomas Mathews 12 Dec 2012 DONE
=
Romulan: Gunboat Flotillas: CPX: Cost (524.112) 3 The cost listed under (524.112) specifically states that a causual PF group costs 3 EPs. Thomas Mathews 12 Dec 2012 DONE
=
All "ADD R1." Items have been DONE for the Romulans.
=
Romulan ASC: Recommend removing note (526.46) from notes column, it is already in the substitution column - Eric S. Smith 08 JAN 2013.
NO CHANGE, SVC THINKS IT IS NEEDED BOTH PLACES.
=
Romulan BATS: Change build cost column to "Upgrade Only".
SVC: DONE FOR ALL ROMULAN BASES
Change notes column to "Battlestation. See EW Chart. See (433.41), (441.0), and (510.3). Module Limits: 2FTM or 1FTM + 1PFM. Can Cloak." - Eric S. Smith 08 JAN 2013.
SVC: DONE
=
Romulan BS: Change notes to "Base Station. See (444.0). Module Limits: 2FTM or 1FTM + 1PFM. See EW Chart" - Eric S. Smith 08 JAN 2013.
DONE
=
Romulan BSX: Change build cost column to "Upgrade Only". Change notes to "X-Base Station. See (444.0). See EW Chart. Module Limits: 2FTM or 1FTM + 1PFM." - Eric S. Smith 08 JAN 2013.
DONE
=
Romulan BTX: On counter front and rear, remove P from within the () used for fighters. Change notes to "X-Battlestation; see EW Chart. Module Limits: 2FTM + 1PFM." - Eric S. Smith 08 JAN 2013.
DONE
=
Romulan DIP: Change size to "—NA—" to match other EMPIRES. - Eric S. Smith 08 JAN 2013.
DONE
=
Romulan FRD+: Change notes to "See (441.433) With fighter modules; (421.0) without." - Eric S. Smith 08 JAN 2013.
ADDED, RATHER THAN CHANGED.
=
Romulan Ftr-Depot: Change references in build cost to "(443.3)" not ("445.3)". Change notes to "Fighter Depot. See (443.0)." - Eric S. Smith 08 JAN 2013.
WRONG, FIGHTER DEPOT IS 445 NOT 443, NO CHANGE MADE
=
Romulan Ftr-Module: Change designation to "FTM (Ftr-Module)" to make more sense." - Eric S. Smith 08 JAN 2013.
DOESN’T MAKE ANY MORE OR LESS SENSE TO ME. NO CHANGE.
=
Romulan Ftr-Module: Change notes to "Fighter module for base or FRD (441.411)." - Eric S. Smith 08 JAN 2013.
DONE, BUT WOULD HAVE BEEN EASIER FOR US BOTH IF IT HAD BEEN JUST "ADD (441.411)."
=
Romulan MB: Change notes column to "Mobile Base. See (510.2); EW=1, Module Limits: 2FTM or 1FTM+1PFM. Can Cloak." - Eric S. Smith 08 JAN 2013.
DONE
=
Romulan MPAL (PF): Change conversion cost to "None" to match other races and pallets. - Eric S. Smith 08 JAN 2013.
DONE
=
Romulan OPB: Change notes to "Operational Base, moves as military convoy. (2 EW:5 AF), (1 EW:10 AF). Module Limits 2FTM or 1FTM + 1PFM ." for consistency. - Eric S. Smith 08 JAN 2013.
DONE
=
Romulan PRD: Move to "Planetary Units" section for consistency. - Eric S. Smith 08 JAN 2013.
THAT IS WHERE IT IS NOW; NO CHANGE.
=
Romulan PWR module: Change notes to "Power augmentation module for base, (441.5). Treated as a PFM." - Eric S. Smith 08 JAN 2013.
DONE
=
Romulan REPR: Change notes to "Repair ship; See (422.0)". - Eric S. Smith 08 JAN 2013.
DONE
=
Romulan SB: Change notes to "Starbase. See EW Chart. See (433.41), (441.0), and (510.3). Module Limits 4FTM+2PFM." - Eric S. Smith 08 JAN 2013.
DONE, BUT STARTING TO WONDER IF THE STAFF SHOULD HAVE ENDORSED THIS FIRST.
=
Romulan SBX: Change notes to "X-Starbase. See EW Chart. See (433.41), (441.0), and (510.3). Module Limits 4FTM+2PFM." - Eric S. Smith 08 JAN 2013.
DONE, IBID
=
Romulan STB: Change notes to "Sector Base. See EW Chart. Module, Limits: 2FTM + 1PFM.". - Eric S. Smith 08 JAN 2013.
DONE, IBID
=
Romulan: Markers and Special Units: Cloak Decoy: Build Cost: add (538.62): 5 Cloaked Decoys can be built for SC2 units for a cost of 5 EPs under (538.62) Thomas Mathews 20 Jan 2013
DONE
=
Romulan: King Condor Battleship: ICN, Ref: 96, Factors 20(12)/10(6), Product: TBD, CMND: 10, Date Avail: Y177 (436.0), Base Hull Size: KCN(2), Conversion Cost, Source: KCN: 4+24, Build Cost Special: 38+24, Salvage: 9.0, Notes: Heavy Carrier of Battleship Entire Entry missing, other empires have their BBV ship included in their SITs. Thomas Mathews 18 Feb 2013
ADDED, GOOD REPORT
=
Romulan: King Condor Battleship: TCS, Ref: 97, Factors 20(6)P/10(3)P, Product: TBD, CMND: 10, Date Avail: Y182 (436.0), Base Hull Size: KCN(2), Conversion Cost, Source: From KCN: 5+12+PFs, From ICV: 3+PFs, Build Cost Special: 41+12+PFs, Salvage: 9.0, Notes: Space Control Ship variant of Battleship Entire Entry missing, other empires have their SDS ships included in their SITs. Thomas Mathews 18 Feb 2013
ADDED, GOOD REPORT
=
Romulan: K10 Battleship: K10V, Ref: 98, Factors 20(12)/10(6), Product: TBD, CMND: 10, Date Avail: Y177 (436.0), Base Hull Size: K10(2), Conversion Cost, Source: From K10: 4+24, Build Cost Special: 38+24, Salvage: 9.0, Notes: Heavy Carrier of Battleship Entire Entry missing, other empires have their BBV ship included in their SITs. Thomas Mathews 20 Feb 2013
ADDED, GOOD REPORT
=
Romulan: K10 Battleship: K10S, Ref: 99, Factors 20(6)P/10(3)P, Product: TBD, CMND: 10, Date Avail: Y182 (436.0), Base Hull Size: K10(2), Conversion Cost, Source: K10: 5+12+PFs, K10V:3+PFs, Build Cost Special: 41+12+PFs, Salvage: 9.0, Notes: Space Control Ship variant of Battleship Entire Entry missing, other empires have their SDS ships included in their SITs. Thomas Mathews 20 Feb 2013
ADDED, GOOD REPORT
=

By Steve Cole (Stevecole) on Tuesday, March 31, 2015 - 03:12 pm: Edit

I do not know the answer to the above without digging into it and I have the staff for that.

So guys, dig and report.

Romulan SKR: Date format: Y174; From SKE: 1+8; From SK?: 1.5+8; For SK: 4.5+8; Salv: 0.875; Notes: Factors confirmed at 4-5[8]box;/3box; since the SKR must use the SKE ageis chassis and has excess cargo for the factors. STRONG - 31 MAR 2015

By Thomas Mathews (Turtle) on Monday, December 31, 2012 - 06:40 am: Edit

Romulan: Firehawk Heavy Cruisrs: FHU: YIS: Y177 should be Y179. The Romulans receive heavy fighter carriers on turn 22 which is the spring of Y179 according to (530.223). Thomas Mathews 31 Dec 2012

DONE

By Richard B. Eitzen (Rbeitzen) on Wednesday, June 26, 2013 - 10:59 am: Edit

Romulan FHM: Page 13 of R10 says that it is impossible to put M (escort) modules on a FH. This ship should be removed from the chart.

IT ACTUALLY IS NOT IMPOSSIBLE. AT LEAST ONE WAS BUILT, POSSIBLY THREE.

By Thomas Mathews (Turtle) on Thursday, January 23, 2014 - 10:06 am: Edit

Romulan: Seahawk Frigates: SEB: Cost 4.5+6 should be 3.5+6 Escort carriers are base hull +1 EP for carriers plus the cost of fighters. The SEH has a base cost of 2.5. Thomas Mathews 23 Jan 2014

DONE

By Steven E. Ehrbar (See) on Saturday, February 08, 2014 - 04:10 pm: Edit

Romulan SHH: Reference number should be 133, not Future.

DONE

By Thomas Mathews (Turtle) on Saturday, April 05, 2014 - 11:33 am: Edit

Romulan: FireHawk Heavy Cruisers: FHU: YIS: Y177 should be Y179. Y179 is the Hvy Fighter Introduction Date in G3 and (530.0). Also This unit is given Y177 as an arbritary date in G3 but was unbuilt. G3 report also posted for this unit. Thomas Mathews 5 Apr 2014

Romulan: Small Auxiliaries: SAH: YIS: Y175 should be Y179. Y179 is the Hvy Fighter Introduction Date in G3 and (530.0). Thomas Mathews 5 Apr 2014

BOTH DONE

By Ryan Opel (Ryan) on Saturday, January 24, 2015 - 07:29 pm: Edit

DONE 5 APRIL 2017

NH to NHB should be 2+16. Ryan J Opel 24 Jan 15

FH to FHB should be 2+16. Ryan J Opel 24 Jan 15

FH to FHM should be 2. Ryan J Opel 24 Jan 15

FHU should be FarH base hull. Ryan J Opel 24 Jan 15

By Chuck Strong (Raider) on Thursday, April 09, 2015 - 04:16 am: Edit

D0NE 5 APRIL 2017

Romulan: War Eagle Cruiser: 3FE: There now needs to be two entries: one 3FE and one FE. Keep 3FE and remove FE from designator. Old note is obsolete as the basic set eliminated unbreakable groups; replace note with: "Three uncrippled FEs collectively carry 10EP (442.31); acts as a tug in some cases." -- STRONG - 7 Apr 2015

<B><FONT COLOR="119911">Romulan: War Eagle Cruiser: FE: ADD new line entry for the separate unit as Basic F&E introduced new counter theater transports.
FE; Ref 30; 2-6U/1-3; prod F&E; CR=3; date Y164; hull WE(3); From WE/KE: 1; For WE: 6; salv 1.500; Notes: Theater Transport (539.72); can carry 3EP. -- STRONG - 7 Apr 2015</FONT></B>

By Ryan Opel (Ryan) on Sunday, June 28, 2015 - 05:20 pm: Edit

DONE 5 APRIL 2017

Romulan: SparrowHawk: SPH notes add (421.21) as a reference. Ryan J Opel 28 Jun 15

By Howard Bampton (Bampton) on Monday, April 03, 2017 - 01:47 pm: Edit

DONE 5 APRIL 2017

Multiple "+PFS" used in several places instead of glyph - Howard Bampton 2017-04-03
NONE FOUND, GLOBAL SEARCH DONE TO MULTIPLE SITs DAYS AGO

KRP Build & conversion costs for PFs missing- add glyph - Howard Bampton 2017-04-03

MPAL (SCS) Build cost for PFs missing- add glyph - Howard Bampton 2017-04-03

HAA factors are shown as "3-8-1-4" instead of "3-8/1-4" suspect this has propagated through several other (all?) SITS. - Howard Bampton 2017-04-03 THAT'S THE WAY IT WAS IN CAPTAIN'S LOG, UNSPOTTED BY F&E STAFF, PETRICK, JEAN, OR MYSELF. THAT'S WHY IT'S NOW IN EVERY SIT.

By Steve Cole (Stevecole) on Wednesday, April 05, 2017 - 02:55 pm: Edit

DONE 5 APRIL 2017

ROC Build & conversion costs for PFs missing- add glyph - Howard Bampton 2017-04-03

TH Build & conversion costs for PFs missing- add glyph - Howard Bampton 2017-04-03

FHE Build & conversion costs for PFs missing- add glyph - Howard Bampton 2017-04-03

SPE Build & conversion costs for PFs missing- add glyph - Howard Bampton 2017-04-03

SKC Build & conversion costs for PFs missing- add glyph - Howard Bampton 2017-04-03

By Steve Cole (Stevecole) on Wednesday, April 05, 2017 - 03:14 pm: Edit

DONE 5 APRIL 2017

HAA Is "Generic" in designation needed? - Howard Bampton 2017-04-03

ASC Build & conversion costs for PFs missing- add glyph - Howard Bampton 2017-04-03

HAP Build & conversion costs for PFs missing- add glyph - Howard Bampton 2017-04-03

LAP Build & conversion costs for PFs missing- add glyph - Howard Bampton 2017-04-03

SAP Build & conversion costs for PFs missing- add glyph - Howard Bampton 2017-04-03

By Gary Carney (Nerroth) on Tuesday, April 21, 2015 - 07:51 pm: Edit

THIS MESS IS NOT AS SIMPLE AS GARY WOULD HAVE IT. THE ROMULANS HISTORICALLY ACQUIRED MANY OF THESE GENERIC WARP UNITS PRIOR TO SMARBA, SOMETIMES DECADES EARLIER. WILL REQUIRE CASE BY CASE REVIEW.

I TOOK A RUN AT IT BUT THE STAFF MAY HAVE OTHER THOUGHTS.

Romulan: Monitors and Pallets: MON: YIS date is listed as Y140; should be in (or after) Y159. Rationale: As per the Early Years Romulan data in SFB Module Y1, Y2, Y3, and YG3, the Romulans remained at a non-tactical-warp technology level prior to the Treaty of Smarba in Y159. - Gary Carney 21 April 2015 SVC THINKS THIS PURCHASE UNLIKELY

Romulan: Large Auxiliaries: FHL: YIS date is listed as Y120; should be in (or after) Y159. Rationale: As per the Early Years Romulan data in SFB Module Y1, Y2, Y3, and YG3, the Romulans remained at a non-tactical-warp technology level prior to the Treaty of Smarba in Y159. - Gary Carney 21 April 2015 SVC THINKS THIS PURCHASE UNLIKELY

Romulan: Large Auxiliaries: FTL: YIS date is listed as Y120; should be in (or after) Y159. Rationale: As per the Early Years Romulan data in SFB Module Y1, Y2, Y3, and YG3, the Romulans remained at a non-tactical-warp technology level prior to the Treaty of Smarba in Y159. - Gary Carney 21 April 2015 PURCHASE PLAUSIBLE

Romulan: Small Auxiliaries: FTS: YIS date is listed as Y120; should be in (or after) Y159. Rationale: As per the Early Years Romulan data in SFB Module Y1, Y2, Y3, and YG3, the Romulans remained at a non-tactical-warp technology level prior to the Treaty of Smarba in Y159. - Gary Carney 21 April 2015 PURCHASE PLAUSIBLE

Romulan: Small Auxiliaries: FHS: YIS date is listed as Y120; should be in (or after) Y159. Rationale: As per the Early Years Romulan data in SFB Module Y1, Y2, Y3, and YG3, the Romulans remained at a non-tactical-warp technology level prior to the Treaty of Smarba in Y159. - Gary Carney 21 April 2015 SVC THINKS THIS PURCHASE UNLIKELY

Romulan: Small Auxiliaries: SAS: YIS date is listed as Y140; should be in (or after) Y159. Rationale: As per the Early Years Romulan data in SFB Module Y1, Y2, Y3, and YG3, the Romulans remained at a non-tactical-warp technology level prior to the Treaty of Smarba in Y159. - Gary Carney 21 April 2015 SVC THINKS THIS PURCHASE UNLIKELY

Romulan: Small Auxiliaries: SAC: YIS date is listed as Y150; should be in (or after) Y159. Rationale: As per the Early Years Romulan data in SFB Module Y1, Y2, Y3, and YG3, the Romulans remained at a non-tactical-warp technology level prior to the Treaty of Smarba in Y159. - Gary Carney 21 April 2015 PURCHASE PLAUSIBLE

Romulan: Mobile Support Units: CONVOY: YIS date is listed as Y119; should be in (or after) Y159. Rationale: As per the Early Years Romulan data in SFB Module Y1, Y2, Y3, and YG3, the Romulans remained at a non-tactical-warp technology level prior to the Treaty of Smarba in Y159. - Gary Carney 21 April 2015 SVC THINKS THIS PURCHASE UNLIKELY

Romulan: Mobile Support Units: Commercial Convoy: YIS date is listed as Y120; should be in (or after) Y159. Rationale: As per the Early Years Romulan data in SFB Module Y1, Y2, Y3, and YG3, the Romulans remained at a non-tactical-warp technology level prior to the Treaty of Smarba in Y159. - Gary Carney 21 April 2015 SVC THINKS THIS PURCHASE UNLIKELY

Romulan: Mobile Support Units: APT: YIS date is listed as Y119; should be in (or after) Y159. Rationale: As per the Early Years Romulan data in SFB Module Y1, Y2, Y3, and YG3, the Romulans remained at a non-tactical-warp technology level prior to the Treaty of Smarba in Y159. - Gary Carney 21 April 2015 PURCHASE ALL BUT CERTAIN

Romulan: Mobile Support Units: PTR: YIS date is listed as Y119; should be in (or after) Y159. Rationale: As per the Early Years Romulan data in SFB Module Y1, Y2, Y3, and YG3, the Romulans remained at a non-tactical-warp technology level prior to the Treaty of Smarba in Y159. - Gary Carney 21 April 2015 PURCHASE ALL BUT CERTAIN

Romulan: Mobile Support Units: SAF: YIS date is listed as Y119; should be in (or after) Y159. Rationale: As per the Early Years Romulan data in SFB Module Y1, Y2, Y3, and YG3, the Romulans remained at a non-tactical-warp technology level prior to the Treaty of Smarba in Y159. - Gary Carney 21 April 2015 SVC THINKS THIS PURCHASE UNLIKELY

Romulan: Repair Docks: FRD: YIS date is listed as Y139; should be in (or after) Y159. Rationale: As per the Early Years Romulan data in SFB Module Y1, Y2, Y3, and YG3, the Romulans remained at a non-tactical-warp technology level prior to the Treaty of Smarba in Y159. - Gary Carney 21 April 2015 SVC THINKS THIS PURCHASE UNLIKELY

Romulan: Bases: BS(N): YIS date is listed as Y120; should be in (or after) Y159. Rationale: As per the Early Years Romulan data in SFB Module Y1, Y2, Y3, and YG3, the Romulans remained at a non-tactical-warp technology level prior to the Treaty of Smarba in Y159. - Gary Carney 21 April 2015 SVC SEES NO REASON BASES CANNOT BE BUILT AS ANY OTHER EMPIRE.

Romulan: Bases: BTS(N): YIS date is listed as Y130; should be in (or after) Y159. Rationale: As per the Early Years Romulan data in SFB Module Y1, Y2, Y3, and YG3, the Romulans remained at a non-tactical-warp technology level prior to the Treaty of Smarba in Y159. - Gary Carney 21 April 2015 SVC SEES NO REASON BASES CANNOT BE BUILT AS ANY OTHER EMPIRE.

Romulan: Bases: MB: YIS date is listed as Y139; should be in (or after) Y159. Rationale: As per the Early Years Romulan data in SFB Module Y1, Y2, Y3, and YG3, the Romulans remained at a non-tactical-warp technology level prior to the Treaty of Smarba in Y159. - Gary Carney 21 April 2015 PURCHASE UNDERTAIN

Romulan: Bases: SB(N): YIS date is listed as Y140; should be in (or after) Y159. Rationale: As per the Early Years Romulan data in SFB Module Y1, Y2, Y3, and YG3, the Romulans remained at a non-tactical-warp technology level prior to the Treaty of Smarba in Y159. - Gary Carney 21 April 2015 SVC SEES NO REASON BASES CANNOT BE BUILT AS ANY OTHER EMPIRE.

Romulan: Planetary Units: PGB: YIS date is listed as Y119; should be in (or after) Y159. Rationale: As per the Early Years Romulan data in SFB Module Y1, Y2, Y3, and YG3, the Romulans remained at a non-tactical-warp technology level prior to the Treaty of Smarba in Y159. - Gary Carney 21 April 2015 SVC SEES NO REASON BASES CANNOT BE BUILT AS ANY OTHER EMPIRE.

By Thomas Mathews (Turtle) on Sunday, February 26, 2017 - 07:43 pm: Edit

DONE 5 APRIL 2017

Monitors & Pallets: MPAL(SCS): Cost: 5+6 should be 5+6+PFs. The cost of the PFs is missing from the actual cost of the pallet. Thomas Mathews 26 Feb 2017

By Ryan Opel (Ryan) on Sunday, February 26, 2017 - 07:51 pm: Edit

MADE IT Y159. UNTIL SMARBA THERE IS NOTHING FOR AN MMG TO DO.

MMG. Change availability to Y132. In notes Free MMGs available per (321.11) during General War. This is a rule change in (657.432). Ryan J Opel 26 Feb 2017

By Howard Bampton (Bampton) on Friday, March 31, 2017 - 02:57 pm: Edit

DONE 5 APRIL 2017, SOME ITEMS WERE DELETED AND TRANSFERRED TO OTHER POSTS.

SNE: SIT conversion lists 'From : 1'. Should say "From SN: 1". Howard Bampton, 2017-03-31

BHB: Missing unit. SFB ref- R4.934, published CL#51, factors presumably 6/3. Howard Bampton, 2017-03-31

SKH: Conversion cost listed as "From SK:" while other SK conversions are "From: SK?:". Howard Bampton, 2017-03-31

SPU- Conversion cost listed as "From SP:" while most other SP conversions are "From: SP?:". Howard Bampton, 2017-03-31

SPM: Conversion cost listed as "From SP:" while most other SP conversions are "From: SP?:". Howard Bampton, 2017-03-31

FHF: YIS in G3 is listed as Y175, SIT says Y174. Howard Bampton, 2017-03-31 NOT UNUSUAL FOR SIT TO BE A YEAR EARLIER DUE TO SFB PROTOTYPE RULE

DMH: "Modular DN, see 525.61." Add ()'s: "Modular DN, see (525.61)." Howard Bampton, 2017-03-31

MGH: "Modular DN, see (525.62)" Add trailing "."- Modular DN, see (525.62)." Howard Bampton, 2017-03-31

SEF: fighter cost looks suspect for substitution- For SEH: 3.5+8. Should be +6, not +8. Howard Bampton, 2017-03-31

SEF: fighter cost looks suspect for conversion- For SEH: 1+8. Should be +6, not +8. Howard Bampton, 2017-03-31

VUL: Build says 'Sub for CON: 12' should be 'For CON: 12' to be consistent with other entries. Howard Bampton, 2017-03-31

By Frank Brooks (Alskdjf) on Wednesday, April 05, 2017 - 05:36 pm: Edit

DONE 6 APRIL 2017

FAB: This unit should probably be moved to the FarHawk Heavy Cruisers section. F Brooks, 5 April, 2017.

FHC: The text "(minor)" in the Conversion Cost column should be replaced with the downward pointing triangle. This occurs twice. F Brooks, 5 April, 2017.

FAE: The word "Romulan"
FAC: The word "Romulan".
FAS: The word "Romulan"
DONE YESTERDAY

By Frank Brooks (Alskdjf) on Wednesday, April 05, 2017 - 05:37 pm: Edit

TWO ITEMS DONE 6 APRIL 2017, TWO DONE EARLIER, ONE SENT TO STAFF

HDWx: To be consistent with other rules references (which do not indicate a product), the text "in AO" should be removed from the Conversion Cost and Build Cost columns. F Brooks, 5 April, 2017.

HDWx: The Notes column of "new" HDWs (C, G, H, K, P, R, S) should be changed, since not all of them are carrier modes. F Brooks, 5 April, 2017.

GHC: The word "Romulan"
GHJ: The word "Romulan"
DONE EARLIER

By Frank Brooks (Alskdjf) on Wednesday, April 05, 2017 - 05:38 pm: Edit

DONE 6 APRIL 2017

SEB: The word "Group" should be removed from the Notes column as this is a single ship. F Brooks, 5 April, 2017.

K10V: The word "bsttleship" in the Notes column should be "battleship". F Brooks, 5 April, 2017.

KF5WR: All of the units in this section are missing the Base Hull information in the Base Hull column. The size class information is present. F Brooks, 5 April, 2017.

KE6: The word "Klgn" in the Base Hull column can be removed, since this entire section is ships that were converted from Klingon ships. By default, the base hull will be Klingon. The same word can be removed from the Conversion Cost column (for the same reason). F Brooks, 5 April, 2017.

KE6: There should probably be parens around the reference to "431.6" in the Build Cost column. F Brooks, 5 April, 2017.

By Frank Brooks (Alskdjf) on Wednesday, April 05, 2017 - 05:39 pm: Edit

DONE 6 APRIL 2017

VUL: To be consistent with other entries, the Salvage column should be 3.000. F Brooks, 5 April, 2017.

PE: The Date Avail column should have a "Y" before the number. F Brooks, 5 April, 2017.

CH (2CH): To be consistent with other entries, the Salvage column should be 2.250. F Brooks, 5 April, 2017.

HAA: The word "Generic" can be removed from the Designation column. F Brooks, 5 April, 2017.

JAA: The SFB Ref # should be "R1.A34". F Brooks, 5 April, 2017.

By Frank Brooks (Alskdjf) on Wednesday, April 05, 2017 - 05:39 pm: Edit

DONE 6 APRIL 2017

JAC: The SFB Ref # should be "R1.A23". The Product column should be "CL44". F Brooks, 5 April, 2017.

JAC: To be consistent with the listing for this unit in other empire's SITs, the Build Cost column should be "6". F Brooks, 5 April, 2017.

JAP: The SFB Ref # should be "R1.A26". The Product column should be "CL44". F Brooks, 5 April, 2017.

JTH: Is this unit SFB's FTJ (the one in CL #44, not CL #44S)? If so, the SFB Ref # should be "R1.A28". Either way, the Product column should be "CL44". F Brooks, 5 April, 2017.

JAV: The SFB Ref # should be "R1.A24". The Product column should be "CL44". F Brooks, 5 April, 2017.

By Frank Brooks (Alskdjf) on Wednesday, April 05, 2017 - 05:40 pm: Edit

DONE 6 APRIL 2017

JHV: The SFB Ref # should probably be "Future", as there doesn't appear to be an SFB version of this unit. The closest I can find is the JBV (Jumbo Auxiliary Battle Carrier), but that doesn't carry heavy fighters. Either way, the Product column should be "CL44". F Brooks, 5 April, 2017.

JSC: The SFB Ref # should be "R1.A27". The Product column should be "CL44". F Brooks, 5 April, 2017.

LAC: To be consistent with the other entries in this section, the word "Large" should be added at the beginning of the Notes column. F Brooks, 5 April, 2017.

FTH: To be consistent with the other entries in this section, the word "Aux" in the Notes column should be "Auxiliary". F Brooks, 5 April, 2017.

SAC: To be consistent with the other entries in this section, the word "Small" should be added at the beginning of the Notes column. F Brooks, 5 April, 2017.

By Frank Brooks (Alskdjf) on Wednesday, April 05, 2017 - 05:41 pm: Edit

ENTIRE REPORT OBSOLETE, CHART WAS REPLACED WITH NEW MEGACHART SINCE YOU SAW IT.

SB: Is the information in the Salvage column correct? The SITs for other empires show zero for this unit. F Brooks, 5 April, 2017.

Ftr-Module: Is the information in the Salvage column correct? The SITs for other empires show zero for this unit. F Brooks, 5 April, 2017.

Ftr-Depot: Is the information in the Salvage column correct? The SITs for other empires show zero for this unit. F Brooks, 5 April, 2017.

BSX: The SFB Ref # should be "R1.207". F Brooks, 5 April, 2017.

BSX: Is the information in the Salvage column correct? The SITs for other empires show zero for this unit. F Brooks, 5 April, 2017.

By Frank Brooks (Alskdjf) on Wednesday, April 05, 2017 - 05:42 pm: Edit

ENTIRE REPORT OBSOLETE, CHART WAS CHANGED.

SBX: Is the information in the Salvage column correct? The SITs for other empires show zero for this unit. F Brooks, 5 April, 2017.

C-BASE: Is the information in the Salvage column correct? The SITs for other empires show zero for this unit. F Brooks, 5 April, 2017.

COLONY: Is the information in the Salvage column correct? The SITs for other empires show zero for this unit. F Brooks, 5 April, 2017.

========
AS I SAID YESTERDAY OR BEFORE, THAT WAS ADDED TO EVERY SIT IN A GLOBAL UPDATE AND NEEDS NO FURTHER REPORT
SYMBOLS USED: Should probably add a definition for the "cost of PFs" symbol ¶. F Brooks, 5 April, 2017.

By Steve Cole (Stevecole) on Thursday, April 06, 2017 - 04:31 pm: Edit

Recommend splitting up NovaHawk and SuperHawk.--Strong; DONE
=
Rom FHF: Recommend adding missing two-step conversion: From SP: 7‡ [SP:FH 3 + FH:FHF 5 – 1‡]..--Strong; DONE
=
Rom VHK: Recommend adding missing two-step conversion: From SP: 4‡t [SP:FH 3 + FH:VHK 2 – 1‡]..--Strong; NOT DONE (1) already there with cost of fighters, (2) your entry doesn’t list the fighters.
=
Rom FFH: Recommend adding missing two-step conversion: From SP: 5‡t [SP:FH 3 + FH:FFH 3 – 1‡].--Strong; DONE
=
Rom FHC: Convert the two "(minor)" to the (down triangle) t.--Strong; Ryan; THIS WAS DONE EARLIER ON OTHER REPORTS.
=
Rom FAK: Recommend adding missing conversion: >From SP: 5+12. --Strong; DONE, but does this need a two-step conversion mark?
=
Rom FAK: Recommend moving to classification: FAR-HAWK HEAVY CRUISERS. --Strong; DONE EARLIER
=
Rom FAB: Recommend adding missing two-step conversion: From SP: 6‡+28 [SP:FAK 5 + FAK:FAB 2 – 1‡]. --STRONG; DONE
=
Rom FAB: Add conversion: From SPB: 5+16. --STRONG; DONE
=
Rom FAB: Recommend moving to classification: FAR-HAWK HEAVY CRUISERS. --STRONG; Already done earlier.
=
Rom FHU: Recommend adding missing two-step conversion: From SP: 9‡+28. [SP:FAK 5 + FAK:FHU 5 – 1‡]. --Strong DONE
=
Rom FHU: Correct the conversion to read: From FH: 5+28. --Strong DONE
=
Rom FHU: Add conversion FAK: 3+16. --Strong DONE
=
Rom FHU: Note: The counter and SIT designation (FHU) is in error as this ship is a FarHawk-U and should have the designation of ‘FAU’. FEDS knows we cannot change the counter. Might suggest using "FHU (FAU)" in the designation column. --Strong DONE
=
Rom FHU: Base Hull needs to read "FarH(3). --Strong DONE
=
Rom FHU: Recommend moving to classification: FAR-HAWK HEAVY CRUISERS. --Strong DONE
=
Rom NHB: Recommend adding missing two-step conversion: From FH: 4‡t+16. [FH:NH 3 + NH:NHB 2 – 1‡]. --Strong DONE
=
Recommend changing to the title of SUPER-HEAVY CRUISERS to NOVAHAWK SUPER-HEAVY CRUISERS. Includes the following in order: NH, NHB, KH. Recommend changing all their Base Hull to: NH(3). Rationale: Just like the FarHawk family, these ships are based upon the NovaHawk hull. --Strong, Ryan: DONE
=
Rom SUP: Remove "‡" from the FH [FH to SUP] conversion as this is Cruiser-Carrier hull variant only. --Strong, Ryan DONE
=
Rom SUN: Recommend adding missing two-step conversion: From NH: 3+12. --Strong DONE
=
Rom SUB: Remove conversion from SPB. Rationale: This would be an illegal conversion [SPB to FH to NH to SUP and finally as a SUB variant]. --Strong, Ryan. DONE
=
Recommend adding new classification: SUPERHAWK SUPER-HEAVY CRUISERS-CARRIERS. Include the following order: SUP, SUB, (4SUB), SUN, TH, (4TH). Recommend changing all their Base Hull to: SUP(3). Rationale: Just like the FarHawk family, these ships are based upon the SuperHawk hull.
--Strong, Ryan DONE
=

By Thomas Mathews (Turtle) on Friday, April 07, 2017 - 08:48 pm: Edit

DONE 8 APRIL 2017
Romulan: Sparrow Hawk Light Cruisers: SPV: Product: FP should be AO. The SPV counter is on sheet N+O in Advanced Operations. Thomas Mathews 7 Apr 2017

By Thomas Mathews (Turtle) on Friday, April 07, 2017 - 08:54 pm: Edit

DONE 8 APRIL 2017
Romulan: Skyhawk Destroyers: SKR: Factors: 4-5[8] escort symbol/3 escort symbol should be: 4-5[8] escort symbol/3. FCRs only have the escort on the front side of the counter. If they are crippled they cannot use (526.353) emergency escort. If they are crippled while in a carrier group they retain their escort status under (526.35). Thomas Mathews 7 Apr 2017

By Andrew Bruno (Admeeral) on Thursday, February 02, 2012 - 01:45 am: Edit

CASE DISMISSED

Romulan FHP: Now reads as 'Conversions' "From SP: 6 ‡; From FH: 4". Should read "From SP:6". SP->FH is a 3-pt minor and FH->FHP is a 4-pt *major*, and allowed by (437.1). 3+4-1(2-step)=6, only allowed @ major conversion facility. In conjunction w/ (704.4) is thus self limiting. [Note: I don't really know what the intent was here as the paradox is right in front of me. Being able to convert a SP @ any SB to a mauler variant less prone to shock would be *super cool* for them. Is this special? There is no conversion to mauler from a base hull that is *not* a major in the game at this time.] Andrew Bruno, 1 Feb '12.

AB:
The SP>FHP is an allowed two-step MAJOR conversion costing 6 EP. Is there a question here? --STRONG

By Thomas Mathews (Turtle) on Thursday, February 02, 2012 - 08:43 am: Edit

Romulan SkyHawks: SKR: Conversion: SK? to SKR: 1+8. Missing fighter cost and module cost should be 1 EP to match conversion cost of other empires FCRs. Thomas Mathews 2 Feb 2012

Further information for this post and previous post: (433.43) and the subesquent sub rules do not suggest any unusual costs with regards to modules reqardless of type.

Romulan SkyHawks: SKR: Cost: 4.5+8 Cost should reflect 8 spare fighter factors to match the factors on the counter. Thomas Mathews 2 Feb 2012

By Thomas Mathews (Turtle) on Thursday, February 02, 2012 - 08:28 am: Edit

8 APRIL 2017 MADE IT ONE POINT, NOT SURE WHERE 1.5 CAME FROM

Chuck, a quick look at the SKE SSD suggests there is nothing to warrant such a difference in cost between the conversion of a SK to SKE as compared to the Federation FF to FFE or Klingon F5 to F5E. The escort package is all in the module. The remaining portion of the SSD (non-modular) matches that of any other SK variant including the standard SK.

I also find nothing of note in (R4.N2) or (R4.25) and (R4.25A) that suggest there should be any difference in convresion costs.

Romulan Skyhawks: SKE Conversions: SK? to SKE: 1. Incorrect conversion cost given. All other escorts cost 1 to convert from base hull. Thomas Mathews 2 Feb 2012

By Paul Edwards (Pablomatic) on Wednesday, May 23, 2012 - 12:59 am: Edit

CASE DISMISSED
SIT mistake?

SPB>SPV conversion may indeed cost 1ep in spite of (520.222) but surely the conversion does not require 4 eps for two more fighters?

SVC: THIS REFLECTS THE CHANGE FROM STANDARD TO HEAVY FIGHTERS AS IT ALLOWS YOU TO PUT A BIGGER SQUADRON INTO ONE OF THE THREE SLOTS.

By James Lowry (Rindis) on Friday, May 31, 2013 - 07:43 pm: Edit

DONE 8 APRIL 2017
Romulan WH: Factors are given as "2.5(2.5)/1-3(1)". Should be updated to "2-5(2t)/1-3(1)" [triangle factor] to match SIT and counters in F&E 2010.

DONE EARLY APRIL 2017
Romulan SNE: First line under Conversions should read "From SN: 1" (currently there's just a space between 'From' and the colon).

By Chuck Strong (Raider) on Thursday, June 27, 2013 - 03:18 pm: Edit

PRELIMINARY DATA LINE ADDED 8 APRIL 2017
Romulan: BATTLE HAWK DESTROYER: BHG: Recommend adding the historical Battle Hawk ground combat ship as it is not currently in F&E. Might be a good candidate for adding to an updated CO and to associated 280 counter sheet. Suggested data for BHG: factors 3-5G/1-3; ref 85; Prod TBD; CR6; YIS Y166; Size BH(4); From BH: 1; For SK: 5; salv 1.25; Notes: Commando Variant. STRONG - 27 Jun 2013

By Steve Cole (Stevecole) on Tuesday, March 18, 2014 - 06:46 pm: Edit

At an Origins lunch I said I'd look at "light escort cost discount" ......

IT WAS DISAPPROVED.

By Steve Cole (Stevecole) on Wednesday, April 05, 2017 - 03:21 pm: Edit

DONE 10 APRIL 2017

FAL - most (all?) shipes have shock note of some sort in notes column. - Howard Bampton 2017-04-03 STAFF WILL HAVE TO SEND IT TO ME.

FHP: YIS in G3 is listed as Y172, SIT says Y174. Howard Bampton, 2017-03-31 STAFF MUST RESOLVE THIS

FH: (all heavy hawk versions) Conversion cost listed as "From FH:" while other SP/SK conversions are "From: SK?:". While FH is consistent internally, not consistent with other modular hulls. Howard Bampton, 2017-03-31 SVC WILL CHANGE THIS ONLY IF THE STAFF SAYS SO.

SUP: (all heavy hawk versions) Conversion cost listed as "From FH:" while other SP/SK conversions are "From: SK?:". While SUP/NH is consistent internally, not consistent with other modular hulls. Given the complexity of the SuperHawk and NovaHawk conversions, this may not be worth "fixing". Noted for completeness. Howard Bampton, 2017-03-31 SVC WILL DO WHATEVER THE STAFF SAYS HERE.

By Howard Bampton (Bampton) on Wednesday, April 12, 2017 - 07:09 pm: Edit

DONE OR WAITING FOR STAFF

Z-Symbols used- glyph for PFs not in footer. GIA seems to have removed it. - Howard Bampton 2017-04-12
OUTSIDE OF PRINT AREA

HAP Should we have an actual Ydate for Date Avail instead of PF4? - Howard Bampton 2017-04-12
STAFF ALREADY TOLD TO FIX IT

HSC Should we have an actual Ydate for Date Avail instead of PF5? - Howard Bampton 2017-04-12
IBID

By Howard Bampton (Bampton) on Wednesday, April 12, 2017 - 07:11 pm: Edit

DONE 21 APRIL 2017

QPE should have note about being able to carry EPs from PE - Howard Bampton 2017-04-12

QPE EW value differs from PE value, presumably due to more power being available. Should we confirm this in note column? - Howard Bampton 2017-04-12

QFE entry missing (the 3QFE entry is there). - Howard Bampton 2017-04-12

FAL Shock note missing from notes column - Howard Bampton 2017-04-12 SVC IS NOT SURE WHAT SHOCK NOTE IS MISSING BUT NO ROMULAN MAULER SEEMS TO HAVE ANY SHOCK NOTE

By Howard Bampton (Bampton) on Wednesday, April 12, 2017 - 07:12 pm: Edit

DONE

KRU Add "See" before (431.6) in build column to be consistent with other KR hulls. - Howard Bampton 2017-04-12

K4F Add "See" before (431.6) in build column to be consistent with other KR hulls. - Howard Bampton 2017-04-12

By Howard Bampton (Bampton) on Wednesday, April 12, 2017 - 07:12 pm: Edit

DONE

GHA Missing entry. GHA, 7/7, CL30, 6, Y176, GH(3), From: SP: 1, For SP: (staff?), 1.375, - Howard Bampton 2017-04-12

GHC/GHJ Seems to be disagreement if this is modular or not. - Howard Bampton 2017-04-12

GHC: Conversion from SP needs space between "SP:4" - Howard Bampton 2017-04-12

GHJ: Conversion from SP needs space between "SP:4" - Howard Bampton 2017-04-12

JH Note of "Production Limit, one per turn." Remove comma or replace with ":" - Howard Bampton 2017-04-12

By Howard Bampton (Bampton) on Wednesday, April 12, 2017 - 07:14 pm: Edit

THE STAFF WAS SUPPOSED TO RESOLVE THIS HARD WELDING THING AND NEVER DID, SO I JUST MADE THEM HARD WELDED AND MOVED ON.

SUB/NHB/FHB two of three have note of "Not Modular." All three should have same note in this respect. Unclear if modular/not is correct. - Howard Bampton 2017-04-12

FH (all), SUP (all), NH (all) given SFB "hard wielding" notes in ship description, I suspect all should have "not modular" note except for K/A versions. - Howard Bampton 2017-04-12

FAB - all other specialist Far-Hawks have note of "Not modular". Add to this one. - Howard Bampton 2017-04-12

By Howard Bampton (Bampton) on Wednesday, April 12, 2017 - 07:15 pm: Edit

General- some SITS use S/F others use (A)/(B) for YIS dates. (A/B used in this SIT for PHX, F used for SNX, B used for CPF/CPX, A used for MON, A used for SAP, F used for MEGA-HA). Define A/B standard in footer if used, otherwise use S/F. - Howard Bampton 2017-04-12

I HAVE BEEN FIXING THIS AS I GO ALONG. THERE IS NO A, NO B, NO S. ONLY F.

By Howard Bampton (Bampton) on Wednesday, April 12, 2017 - 07:16 pm: Edit

DONE

CNV (4CNV) Other multiship groups listed as "Individual Ships" in Conversion cost column, not actual ship/cost. - Howard Bampton 2017-04-12

SUB With sub for sub chaining, we don't list CV versions of base hull in build/sub column any longer. Change Build to "For SUP or CON: 12+24" or perhaps: "For SUP/NH/CON: 12+24" - Howard Bampton 2017-04-12

TH (4TH) Factors on counter box has overflowed and cut details. Expand row hieght - Howard Bampton 2017-04-12
HERE IS THE PROBLEM THERE. IT IS SET FOR AUTOHEIGHT. THE ONLY WAY TO EXPAND ROW HEIGHT IS TO LOCK A SPECIFIC SIZE. THE NEXT TIME YOU WANT ME TO ADD A CONVERSION IT WILL PUSH OUT OF THE BOX AND NOBODY WILL KNOW IT IS MISSING

By Howard Bampton (Bampton) on Monday, April 24, 2017 - 08:00 pm: Edit

ITEMS FIXED 26 APRIL 2017

TH Build/Sub should be "For SUP or CON: 15+8+¶". Since one can chain subs, CNV/SCS not required. Also consistent with other SUP if drop these two. - Howard Bampton 2017-04-24

FFH Note should include Not Modular note. "Fast Cruiser (525.1). Not Modular". - Howard Bampton 2017-04-24

FHB Note has two Not Modular entries. Whack one. Suggested text- "Medium Carrier. Not modular. Unusual conversion costs confirmed. " - Howard Bampton 2017-04-24

By Howard Bampton (Bampton) on Monday, April 24, 2017 - 08:01 pm: Edit

CORRECTIONS MADE 26 APRIL 2017

FAB Conversion from SPB should be 5+12, not 5+16. The "B" modules have 8 FTR factors which are being kept. We are adding 6 FTR on base hull. - Howard Bampton 2017-04-24

FAE Conversion from FH should be "8+12+PF glyph" - the second "+" is missing. - Howard Bampton 2017-04-24

By Howard Bampton (Bampton) on Monday, April 24, 2017 - 08:02 pm: Edit

26 APRIL 2017: GHA FIXED, GHJ CORRECT, SHOCK SHIP ISN'T MODULAR.

GHA Note missing "Modular ship" entry: "Heavy War Cruiser. Modular ship" - Howard Bampton 2017-04-24

GHJ The SPJ is modular which suggests no "extra bracing" required in main hull. This should mean the ship is in fact modular. Staff? - Howard Bampton 2017-04-24

By Howard Bampton (Bampton) on Monday, April 24, 2017 - 08:02 pm: Edit

BOTH ITEMS CORRECTED, 26 APRIL 2017

SEF Unit carries 6 replacement fighters. Build cost should be "For SEH: 3.5+6", not 3.5+8. - Howard Bampton 2017-04-24

Symbols used- the upside down triangle used to denote a 4+ point minor conversion is missing or wandered off print area. - Howard Bampton 2017-04-24

By Thomas Mathews (Turtle) on Monday, April 24, 2017 - 08:50 pm: Edit

CORRECT

Heavy War Cruisers: GHJ: Notes: Not Modular. This ship had the modules hard welded. See (R4.A40) in Captain's Log #52, Pg 116 and the SIT in Captain's Log #52, pg 112. Thomas Mathews 24 Apr 2017

REVIEWED 5 MAY 2020 AND FOUND TO HAVE BEEN DONE IN 2017

By Howard Bampton (Bampton) on Thursday, April 27, 2017 - 06:24 pm: Edit

LAS Nonstandard EW notation. Alternative: "Large Auxiliary Scout; EW=3. No cloak." - Howard Bampton 2017-04-27

LAP Nonstandard EW notation. Alternative: "Large Auxiliary PFT (526.4), Scout, EW=2. No cloak" - Howard Bampton 2017-04-27

SAS Nonstandard EW notation. Alternative: "Small Auxiliary Scout, EW=2. No cloak." - Howard Bampton 2017-04-27

<B><FONT COLOR="119911">FEDS note on auxiliary ship build costs: Recommend simply citing for each auxiliary build as follows:
DONE BY SVC 5 MAY 2020

By Howard Bampton (Bampton) on Thursday, April 27, 2017 - 06:25 pm: Edit

Heavy Aux General- note about lack of cloak seems to be needed based upon precident of LA* hulls. Staff? - Howard Bampton 2017-04-27

Jumbo Aux General- note about lack of cloak seems to be needed based upon precident of LA* hulls. Staff? - Howard Bampton 2017-04-27

ADDED 5 MAY 2020

JAP Unit is a scout, notes do not state this. EW missing. Staff? - Howard Bampton 2017-04-27

JAS Unit is a scout, notes do not state this. EW missing. Staff? - Howard Bampton 2017-04-27

ADDED 2017

By Howard Bampton (Bampton) on Thursday, April 27, 2017 - 06:29 pm: Edit

HAP Unit is a scout, notes do not state this. "Auxiliary PFT, Scout, EW=2" - Howard Bampton 2017-04-27

HSC Unit is a scout, notes do not state this. "Auxiliary SCS, Scout, EW=2" - Howard Bampton 2017-04-27

FHS Unit should have No cloak entry in notes based upon Saux/Laux precident. "Small Auxilliary Hospital Ship. No cloak." - Howard Bampton 2017-04-27

SAC Unit should have No cloak entry in notes based upon Saux/Laux precident. "Small Auxiliary Combatant. No cloak. Limit one per year before Y159." - Howard Bampton 2017-04-27

CHECKED MAY 2020 BUT EVERYTHING HAD BEEN DONE I N 2017

By Howard Bampton (Bampton) on Thursday, April 27, 2017 - 06:30 pm: Edit

FALX Consider adding placeholder for UNV X version of Falcon mauler. designation FALX/rule 210/product X1R - Howard Bampton 2017-04-27
PLACEHOLDER LINE ADDED

HDWQ entry missing in HDW section. - Howard Bampton 2017-04-27
ADDED SOMETIME IN 2017

FLG Nonstandard EW notation. Alternative: "Police Flagship, Scout, EW=1, Commando Ship (one battalion). No Cloak" - Howard Bampton 2017-04-27
CHECKED MAY 2020 AND DATA HAD BEEN THERE SINCE 2017

By Howard Bampton (Bampton) on Thursday, April 27, 2017 - 06:33 pm: Edit

QPE conversion from KE missing. Using WE->PE cost as baseline, suggest "From KE: 5" - Howard Bampton 2017-04-27

QCE conversion from KE missing. Using WE->CE cost as baseline, suggest "From KE: 2" - Howard Bampton 2017-04-27

QFE conversion from KE missing. Using WE->FE cost as baseline, suggest "From KE: 1" - Howard Bampton 2017-04-27

SVC ADDED THESE ITEMS IN MAY 2020 BUT CANNOT IMAGINE WHY ANYONE WOULD CONVERT A KE? INTO A QE?.

By Howard Bampton (Bampton) on Thursday, April 27, 2017 - 06:34 pm: Edit

KRE Unit is SR. Factor Diamond should be red. - Howard Bampton 2017-04-27

PE Unit is SR. Factor Diamond should be red. - Howard Bampton 2017-04-27

QPE Unit is SR. Factor Diamond should be red. - Howard Bampton 2017-04-27

QPE Scout not noted in notes. Try: "Pioneer Eagle with KE engines, Scout, EW=3 (confirmed); Can carry 2EP if not surveying." - Howard Bampton 2017-04-27

3QFE Base hull should be "WE(3) Group" based upon (3FE) entry. - Howard Bampton 2017-04-27

SVC DID ALL ITEMS MAY 2020

By Howard Bampton (Bampton) on Thursday, April 27, 2017 - 06:35 pm: Edit

K10S Conversion cost from K10V missing. Presumably "5+ PF glyph" Staff? - Howard Bampton 2017-04-27

KC10 Conversion cost from KC9 missing. Using C8 to C10 cost of 2, suggest "From KC9: 2" Staff? - Howard Bampton 2017-04-27

DONE 5 MAY 2020

QPE/QCE/QFE All of these are variants of KE which has a 9 defense. Is the 8 value assigned to these (but not the KEV) correct? Staff? - Howard Bampton 2017-04-27

QE IS SMALLER, WEAKER THAN KE, FACTOR IS CORRECT, SVC, MAY 2020

By Howard Bampton (Bampton) on Thursday, April 27, 2017 - 06:37 pm: Edit

FHU Unit is scout. Notes do not state this. Also fixing semi-colon instead of colon in EW while here. Suggest: "Area control ship; not modular; Scout (EW=1:6AF, EW=2:2AF)" - Howard Bampton 2017-04-27
WELL, IF IT HAS EW LISTED, IT'S OBVIOUS THAT IT'S A SCOUT. FIXED BY SVC 6 MAY 2020.

SPS Unit is SR. Factor Diamond should be red. - Howard Bampton 2017-04-27

K10V Unit is conjectural. Adjust note: "Conjectural Heavy Carrier variant of K10 battleship" - Howard Bampton 2017-04-27

K10S Unit is conjectural. Fix to use SDS instead of SCS while here. Adjust note: "Conjectural Stellar Domination Ship variant of K10 battleship" - Howard Bampton 2017-04-27

ALL DONE 6 MAY 2020 BY SVC

By Howard Bampton (Bampton) on Thursday, April 27, 2017 - 06:38 pm: Edit

FAS unit has 3 FTR so conversion cost from FHC (0 FTR) should be "+6" for FTR, not "+12" - Howard Bampton 2017-04-27

FAS unit has 3 FTR so conversion cost from FHQ (0 FTR) should be "+6" for FTR, not "+12" - Howard Bampton 2017-04-27

DONE BY SVC 6 MAY 2020

By Howard Bampton (Bampton) on Thursday, April 27, 2017 - 06:41 pm: Edit

@
FHQ Unit is SR. Factor Diamond should be red. - Howard Bampton 2017-04-27

FHC The FHQ is the SR version of this ship. Adjust note to reflect it is only a scout: "Scout, (4EW:2AF)(1EW:7AF). Not modular." - Howard Bampton 2017-04-27

FHE Unit is scout. Notes do not state this. Normalize variable EW from = to : while here. Suggest: "PFT variant of FH (NCA). Scout, (3EW:2AF)(1EW:7AF). Not modular. RegalHawk-E is identical." - Howard Bampton 2017-04-27

FAS Unit is SR. Factor Diamond should be red. - Howard Bampton 2017-04-27

ALL FIXES MADE 6 MAY 2020 BY SVC

By Howard Bampton (Bampton) on Thursday, April 27, 2017 - 06:42 pm: Edit

FHQ The conversion cost for this ship from a FHC should be defined and cheaper than the generic FH one. The SPC/SPS one is 3. Staff should verify, but suggest adding "From FHC: 3" - Howard Bampton 2017-04-27

ADDED BY SVC 6 MAY 2020. STAFF SHOULD HAVE VERIFIED THIS IN 2017 BUT DID NOT.

By Howard Bampton (Bampton) on Thursday, April 27, 2017 - 06:42 pm: Edit

NHX Reference is "216" per R MSSB - Howard Bampton 2017-04-27
DONE BY SVC 6 MAY 2020

NHX CMD is "10" per G3. - Howard Bampton 2017-04-27
DONE BY SVC 6 MAY 2020

FFH Note should include not modular. Suggest: "Fast Cruiser (525.1). Not modular" - Howard Bampton 2017-04-27
WAS DONE SOMETIME EARLIER, MAYBE 2017? VERIFIED BY SVC 6 MAY 2020

FHQ Unit is scout. EW value not defined. Lifted EW from FHC which is same unit. Suggest note be: "Survey version of FireHawk. Survey Ship, Scout, (4EW:2AF)(1EW:7AF). Not modular. Designation FHQ used to avoid conflict with small hospital ship (FHS)." - Howard Bampton 2017-04-27
DONE BY SVC 6 MAY 2020

By Howard Bampton (Bampton) on Thursday, April 27, 2017 - 06:43 pm: Edit

BBL Hull is conjectural. Adjust note (additional text lifted fro Klingon B9 to make it prettier): "Conjectural Fast Raiding Battleship" - Howard Bampton 2017-04-27

ICV Hull is conjectural. Futz with Capitialization while here. Adjust note: "Conjectural Carrier variant of King Condor Battleship" - Howard Bampton 2017-04-27

TCS Hull is conjectural. Use more correct SDS designation while here. Adjust note: "Conjectural Stellar Domination Ship variant of King Condor Battleship" - Howard Bampton 2017-04-27
ABOVE THREE ITEMS DONE BY SVC 6 MAY 2020

ROC: Build cost does not include PF cost. "From CON: 20+ PF glyph" - Howard Bampton 2017-04-27
THE GLYPH WAS THERE AND HAD BEEN THERE FOR YEARS WHEN SVC CHECKED IT ON 6 MAY 2020,

By Nick Samaras (Koogie) on Sunday, April 30, 2017 - 06:23 pm: Edit

BBL: Designation should be KSH.(Nick Samaras, April 30, 2017)
DONE BY SVC 6 MAY 2020

FHC: Delete "survey ship" from notes column, this belongs to the FHQ. (Nick Samaras, April 30, 2017)
DONE EARLIER BY SVC 6 MAY 2020

FAS: Conversions from FH, FHC, and FHQ should be +6 for fighters, not +12. (Nick Samaras, April 30, 2017)
DONE EARLIER BY SVC 6 MAY 2020

GHA: Construction cost should be 5.5, not 6 as per the other HCWs, the salvage cost, and the following costs of the GHC and GHJ. Needs battle group symbol (Nick Samaras, April 30, 2017)
DONE BY SVC 6 MAY 2020


GHJ: Delete battle group symbol, the SPJ does not have it. (Nick Samaras, April 30, 2017)
DONE BY SVC 6 MAY 2020

By Nick Samaras (Koogie) on Sunday, April 30, 2017 - 06:26 pm: Edit

JH: Ref # should be 138. (Nick Samaras, April 30, 2017)
DONE BY SVC ON 6 MAY 2020

SVC MADE SPACE FOR BELOW ITEMS BUT AWAITS STAFF INPUT.

K10: Needs conversion from B10-. (Nick Samaras, April 30, 2017)

K10V: Needs conversion from B10, B10-, and B10V. (Nick Samaras, April 30, 2017)

K10S: Needs conversion from B10, B10-; B10V, B10S, and K10V. (Nick Samaras, April 30, 2017)

KC10: Needs conversion from Kc9. (Nick Samaras, April 30, 2017)

KRC: Needs conversion from D7. (Nick Samaras, April 30, 2017)

K7V: Needs conversion from D7V. (Nick Samaras, April 30, 2017)

K7X: Needs conversion from DX. (Nick Samaras, April 30, 2017)

By Stefano Predieri (Preda) on Friday, August 10, 2018 - 10:56 am: Edit

SVC DID THIS ON 6 MAY 2020.
Romulan HDWR has the escort square. HDWR shouldn't have it. Is an error or one of the milion Romulan exceptions? If it's an exception it could also be used as an emergency escort like an ordinary FCR? FEDS: Concurs - Remove escort box from SIT. Rationale: HDWRs are not emergency escorts per (525.23R).

By Ted Fay (Catwhoeatsphoto) on Friday, October 19, 2018 - 02:46 pm: Edit

SVC ADDED THE TWO SYMBOLS ON 6 MAY 2020
===
FHM: The SIT does not have the double-cross symbol when converted from SP?, and as a 4-point conversion is thus is a major conversion. However, the SP?->FHM nominally meets the rule 437.2 definition of a 2-step conversion. Should the ship have the double-cross symbol to note that it is a 2-step minor conversion costing 4 points? Also, because it meets the definition of a 2-step conversion, is the SP?->FHM more properly a 3 point conversion by saving the 1 EP per 437.2? Ted Fay, 18 October 2018.

<FONT COLOR="119911"><B>===============

Rom: Firehawks: FHM: Conversion from SP>FH>FHM is a two-step minor; add ‡ and (minor conversion triangle); symbols. FEDS - 20 Oct 2018
FEAR: Concurs
SVC: "It costs 4. End file."

===============

Supporting Rationale:
SP to FH minor conversion is 3EP;
FH to FHM minor conversion is 2EP (note that the FH engine-mounted F-torps are replaced with Pl-Ds making this escort conversion more costly);
Two-step discount -1EP (437.0);
Overall conversion cost: 3+2-1= 4EP.

SP to FHM looks to be a minor, two-step conversion costing 4EP.</B></FONT>

By Richard B. Eitzen (Rbeitzen) on Sunday, June 09, 2019 - 01:11 pm: Edit

HDWP shows an in service date of Y180, but Romulan PFs don't come out until later. I do not know what YIS this should have. Eitzen 6/9/19.

STEW FRAZIER: Rom PF1=Y181F, so PFTs are Y182

DONE BY SVC ON 6 MAY 2020, CHANGED TO Y182 DURING LATE OCTOBER UNLESS THERE IS A FULL MOON.

By Paul Howard (Raven) on Tuesday, September 24, 2019 - 11:52 am: Edit

From Q&A topic -

This was last asked in 2014, but I can't see it was ever answered (word search on BHE and 704.4 found no reply).

"By Richard B. Eitzen (Rbeitzen) on Tuesday, March 18, 2014 - 03:23 pm: Edit


Q704.4 What is the conversion cost of a SN to a BHE (in F&E 2010). It is not on the SIT. "

In my game with William - we are only playing with the 2010 rules and so the SN to BHE is stated as a legal conversion, but no costs are shown, either in the notes, SIT or on line SIT.

So, what is the conversion cost?

(If it helps, I can see it being 2.0, 2.5 or 3.0 Ep's - the former is probably too cheap, the latter too expensive).

Thanks

Paul

SVC SAYS 6 MAY 2020 YOU CANNOT CONVERT AN SN INTO A BH. WE MIGHT HAVE DONE THAT AS A SPECIAL EXCEPTION IN AN OLD EDITION BECAUSE OF COUNTER SHORTAGES BUT NO, YOU CANNOT DO IT.

By Ken Kazinski (Kjkazinski) on Friday, February 28, 2020 - 01:04 am: Edit

Page 1 CON "See (440.4)." should be "See (440.4)"
Page 1 DMH "None." should be "None"
Page 2 FHQ (FHS) "From SP? 10‡" should be "From SP?: 10‡"
Page 4 HDWE "See (525.2)." should be "See (525.2)" in both columns
Page 5 HDWx "See (525.2)." should be "See (525.2)" in both columns
Page 6 KC10 "(431.6) 20" should be "(431.6): 20"
Page 6 KC5 "(431.6) 16" should be "(431.6): 16"
Page 6 "K7 BATTECRUISER (CONVERSIONS OF KLINGON D7)" should be "K7 BATTLECRUISER (CONVERSIONS OF KLINGON D7)"

ABOVE DONE BY SVC 6 MAY 2020

Page 6 KRE should not "For KR: 13 See (431.6)" be "For KR: 13 (431.6)"
NO, IT SHOULD BE WHAT IT IS.

Page 6 KRP should not
INCOMPLETE REPORT. NO IDEA WHAT HE WANTED.

By Ken Kazinski (Kjkazinski) on Friday, February 28, 2020 - 05:57 pm: Edit

ALL DONE 6 MAY 2020. WHILE OF NO GAME IMPACT (FORMAT ONLY) I GUESS THEY MADE THE WORLD A BETTER PLACE.

Page 8 VLV "For CON 14+20" should be "For CON: 14+20"

Page 8 WE "See (440.4)." should be "See (440.4)"

Page 8 "(3FE)" should be "3FE"

Page 8 BH "See (440.4)." should be "See (440.4)"

By Steve Cole (Stevecole) on Friday, May 05, 2017 - 01:33 pm: Edit

Fix EW spacing
FOUND TWO WITH EXTRA SPACES

Fix Scout capitalization
SEARCH AND REPLACE.

update HDW entries.
SEEMS TO HAVE THE NEW TABLE BUT WHY ARE SALVAGE COSTS INCONSISTENT FROM EMPIRE TO EMPIRE?

Check auto-date on header.
AUTODATE IS FINE, BUT COPYRIGHT DATE NEEDS TO BE AUTOMATED.

By Ken Kazinski (Kjkazinski) on Friday, February 28, 2020 - 09:11 pm: Edit

SVC PROCESSED 6 MAY 2020

Page 10 HAC The build substation cost is 8 with no other information.
SVC HAS NO IDEA WHAT A SUBSTATION COST IS. DO WE BUILT SUBSTATIONS IN F&E?

ALL OF THE EXTRA SPACES BELOW WERE ADDED. FOR SOME REASON, THE VERSION OF THE DOCUMENT I HAVE DOES NOT INCLUDE ANY PER YEAR DATA.

Page 10 JAA "For 3AuxPods: 6" should be "For 3 Aux Pods: 6

Page 10 JAC "For 3Auxpods: 6 (1/year)" should be "For 3 Aux Pods: 6 (1/year)"

Page 10 JAD "For 3Auxpods: 6 (1/year)" should be "For 3 Aux Pods: 6 (1/year)"

Page 10 JAP "For 3AuxPods: 11+¶" should be "For 3 Aux Pods: 11+¶"


Page 10 JAR "For 3AuxPods:" should be "For 3 Aux
Pods: X"

Page 10 FTL "(521.23): 6 (1/yr)" should be "(521.23): 6 (1/year)"

By Howard Bampton (Bampton) on Saturday, May 06, 2017 - 02:33 am: Edit

SVC REVIEW 6 MAY 2020
CALL UP ALREADY IN CELL.
FLG: Build cost lacks "Call up" entry. Add "Call up: 2" Cost per 531.3 - Howard Bampton 2017-05-06

By Thomas Mathews (Turtle) on Monday, August 14, 2017 - 07:46 pm: Edit

SVC CHECKED ON 6 MAY 2020 AND IT HAD SAID 2 FOR YEARS.
Police Units: SNV: Factors: 1-4(3) should be 1-4(2). The SSD shows 4 fighters which equals 2 fighter factors. Thomas Mathews 14 Aug 2017

By Chuck Strong (Raider) on Monday, May 08, 2017 - 01:52 pm: Edit

KRP: ADD conversion From KRE: 3
Rationale: Per (R4.58) from SFB, the Romulans converted their two KRE exploration ships (R4.60) to KRP PF tenders late in the General War. FEDS - 8 MAY 2017

YOU DIDN'T GIVE A NUMBER.
8 MAY 2020: SVC DECIDED 3 SOUNDED RIGHT.

By Howard Bampton (Bampton) on Thursday, May 11, 2017 - 02:15 pm: Edit

HDW COG/FOP/POG etc- entries need to be added to SIT as a part of HDW cleanup. - Howard Bampton 2017-05-11

8 MAY 2020: IT LOOKS TO SVC THAT THIS WAS DONE IN 2017.

By Frank Brooks (Alskdjf) on Friday, May 19, 2017 - 09:20 pm: Edit

ROC: Should the Build Cost column include the ¶ symbol? F Brooks, 19 May 2017.
SVC CHECKED ON 8 MAY 2020 AND THAT SYMBOL IS THERE.

SUU: The SFB Ref # should be R4.127. F Brooks, 19 May 2017.
DONE 8 MAY 2020 SVC

NHX: The SFB Ref # should be R4.216. F Brooks, 19 May 2017.
DONE 8 MAY 2020 SVC

By Frank Brooks (Alskdjf) on Friday, May 19, 2017 - 09:20 pm: Edit

FHB: One occurrence of "Not modular." can be removed from the Notes column. F Brooks, 19 May 2017.
SVC CHECKED 8 MAY IT HAD BEEN DONE EARLIER.

FAK: Should the "not modular" text be added to the Notes column? F Brooks, 19 May 2017.
SVC DID THIS ON 8 MAY 2020.

By Frank Brooks (Alskdjf) on Friday, May 19, 2017 - 09:21 pm: Edit

KC10: The word "See" should probably be added to the beginning of the Build Cost column to be consistent with the other Kestrel-series units. F Brooks, 19 May 2017. SVC CHECKED THIS ON 8 MAY 2020 AND IT ALREADY SAID THAT.

KC5: The word "See" should probably be added to the beginning of the Build Cost column to be consistent with the other Kestrel-series units. F Brooks, 19 May 2017.SVC CHECKED THIS ON 8 MAY 2020 AND IT ALREADY SAID THAT.
NOTE, SUCH A REPORT DOES NOT MEAN THE REPORT WAS WRONG BUT ONLY CONFIRMS THAT SOMEWHERE ALONG THE LINE IT HAD BEEN DONE.

K7V: The word "See" should probably be added to the beginning of the Build Cost column to be consistent with the other Kestrel-series units. F Brooks, 19 May SVC DID THIS ON 8 MAY 2020, UNLIKE OTHER ITEMS IT HAD NEVER BEEN DONE.

By Frank Brooks (Alskdjf) on Friday, May 19, 2017 - 09:22 pm: Edit

CH: Should the Conversion Cost and Build Cost columns have the ¶ symbol? F Brooks, 19 May 2017.
SVC FIXED ON 8 MAY 2020

HEAVY AUXILIARIES: The word "Heavy" should be added to the Notes column for those units that don't already have it. F Brooks, 19 May 2017.
SVC REVIEWED 8 MAY 2020; ALL HAVE THE WORD HEAVY, OBVIOUSLY FIXED ON SOME EARLIER REPORT.

JF: The SFB Ref # should be R1.A30. F Brooks, 19 May 2017. ON 8 MAY 2020 SVC COULD NOT FIND SUCH A UNIT.

JAD: This unit should be removed as it doesn't apply to the Romulans. F Brooks, 19 May 2017. ON 8 MAY 2020 SVC COULD NOT FIND SUCH A UNIT.

By Frank Brooks (Alskdjf) on Friday, May 19, 2017 - 09:22 pm: Edit

FHL: The words "Large Hospital Auxiliary" should be "Large Auxiliary Hospital Ship" to be more consistent with the other large auxiliaries and the FHS. F Brooks, 19 May 2017. SVC CHECKED ON 8 MAY 2020 AND THIS HAD ALREADY BEEN CHANGED.

REPR: The words "Large Auxiliary" should be added to the beginning of the Notes column. F Brooks, 19 May 2017. 8 MAY 2020 SVC FOUND NO SUCH UNIT. IT MAY HAVE BEEN REBRANDED AS LAR.

ASC: The word "Large" should be added to the beginning of the Notes column. F Brooks, 19 May 2017.
8 MAY 2020 SVC REVIEW: THE WORD WAS NOT NECESSARY UNTIL WE ALSO HAD JUMBO AND HEAVY TYPES.

OPB (in Mobile Support Units section): This row should be deleted, as this unit is defined again in the Transportable Bases section. F Brooks, 19 May 2017.
SVC DID THIS 8 MAY 2020

BASES section header: The word "TRANSPORTABLE" should probably be added to the beginning of this header to be consistent with other empires using the new base format. F Brooks, 19 May 2017.
SVC CHECKED 8 MAY 2020 THIS HAD BEEN DONE PREVIOUSLY

By Frank Brooks (Alskdjf) on Friday, May 19, 2017 - 09:22 pm: Edit

BS(F): The sentence starting "Y167 is correct" in the Notes column should be removed. F Brooks, 19 May 2017.
NO IT SHOULD NOT BE REMOVED

SFX(N): One occurrence of "2x" in "2x2xPFM" in the Notes column should be removed. F Brooks, 19 May 2017. SVC CHECKED 8 MAY 2020 AND THIS HAD BEEN FIXED EARLIER. HE DID NOTICE AN EXTRA TYPO AND FIXED THAT.

C-BASE: Is the information in the Salvage column correct? The SITs for other empires show zero for this unit. F Brooks, 19 May 2017.
COLONY: Is the information in the Salvage column correct? The SITs for other empires show zero for this unit. F Brooks, 19 May 2017.
SVC FIXED BOTH ABOVE ERRORS ON 8 MAY 2020

Marine: Other empires' SITs have two black stars in the Designation column for this unit. Should this one as well? F Brooks, 19 May 2017. SVC HAD DONE THIS FROM ANOTHER REPORT.

By Thomas Mathews (Turtle) on Sunday, July 30, 2017 - 08:50 pm: Edit

GryphonHawk Cruisers: GHA: Factors: 7/4 should be 8-7/4, YIS: Y176 should be Y173, For SP: 6 should be For SP: 5.5. All changes from SIT entry in Captain's Log 30. Thomas Mathews 30 Jul 2017
DONE BY SVC 8 MAY 2020

By Ken Kazinski (Kjkazinski) on Sunday, March 29, 2020 - 06:13 pm: Edit

Romulan SAS "Small Auxiliary Scout; (2EW). No cloak." should be "Small Auxiliary Scout; (EW=2). No cloak." SVC 8 MAY 2020 THIS WAS DONE EARLIER.

Romulan SAH "
Small Auxuliary Carrier with heavy fighters. No cloak." should be "
Small Auxiliary Carrier with heavy fighters. No cloak."SVC 8 MAY 2020 THIS WAS DONE EARLIER.

Romulan LAS "Large Auxiliary Scout; (3EW). No cloak." should be "Large Auxiliary Scout; (EW=3). No cloak."SVC 8 MAY 2020 THIS WAS DONE EARLIER.

Romulan LAP "Large Auxiliary PFT (526.4); scout (2EW). No cloak." should be "Large Auxiliary PFT (526.4); scout (EW=2). No cloak."SVC 8 MAY 2020 THIS WAS DONE EARLIER.

Romulan FHU "Area control ship; not modular. (EW=1;6AF, EW=2; 2AF)" should be "Area control ship; not modular. (1EW:6AF, 2EW:2AF)" 8 MAY 2020 SVC DID THIS

Romulan FHS "Small Auxilliary Hospital Ship" should be "Small Auxiliary Hospital Ship"SVC 8 MAY 2020 THIS WAS DONE EARLIER.

Romulan FHE "PFT variant of FH (NCA). (3EW=2AF), (1EW=7AF). Not modular. RegalHawk-E is identical." should be "PFT variant of FH (NCA). (3EW:2AF), (1EW:7AF). Not modular. RegalHawk-E is identical."SVC 8 MAY 2020 THIS WAS DONE EARLIER.

Romulan FAS "Survey Ship; Single Ship Carrier; Scout (4EW:1AF)(1EW:7AF); Not modular" should be "Survey Ship; Single Ship Carrier; Scout4EW:1AF)(1EW:7AF); Not modular"SVC 8 MAY 2020 THIS WAS DONE EARLIER.

Romulan FAE "
Division Control Ship; PFT; Scout (3EW:1AF)(1EW:7AF); Medium/Heavy Carrier; not Modular"" should be "
Division Control Ship; PFT; Scout: (3EW:1AF)(1EW:7AF); Medium/Heavy Carrier; not Modular"
NOT NECESSARY

By Steve Cole (Stevecole) on Wednesday, May 06, 2020 - 02:34 pm: Edit

TCS: YIS YIS should be Y182 FALL. (Nick Samaras, April 30, 2017)
NEED STAFF ENDORSEMENT BEFORE DOING THIS.
FEDS: NON-CONCURS. No basis cited. Rom OOB regarding PFTs states: "Can build PFTs beginning in Y182S".

By Nick Samaras (Koogie) on Sunday, April 30, 2017 - 06:29 pm: Edit

PROCESSED
KRG: Needs conversion from D6/D7, D6G. (Nick Samaras, April 30, 2017)

KRM: Needs conversion from D6/D7, D6M. (Nick Samaras, April 30, 2017)

KRV: Needs conversion from D6.(Nick Samaras, April 30, 2017)

KRE: Needs conversion from D6/D7, D6E, D6S.(Nick Samaras, April 30, 2017)

KRS: Needs conversion from D6/D7, D6S.(Nick Samaras, April 30, 2017)

KRU: Needs conversion from D6/D7, D6U, D6V. (Nick Samaras, April 30, 2017)

KRP: Needs conversion from D6/D7, D6S, D6P, KRS.(Nick Samaras, April 30, 2017)

SPACE HOLDERS SET UP 6 MAY 2020 WAITING FOR STAFF INPUT 8 MAY 2020 SVC DID THEM STAFF REVIEW IN PROGRESS

By Steve Cole (Stevecole) on Wednesday, May 06, 2020 - 02:40 pm: Edit

JH: Does this ship get the battle group symbol? (Nick Samaras, April 30, 2017)
FEDS: Recommends adding battle group symbol.
SVC ADDED § ON 8 MAY 2020

By Frank Brooks (Alskdjf) on Friday, May 19, 2017 - 09:21 pm: Edit

(3FE): The parens should probably be removed from the Designation column. F Brooks, 19 May 2017.SVC CHECKED THIS ON 8 MAY 2020 AND IT ALREADY SAID THAT.

FE: The Salvage column should be 1.500 as there's just one unit being described. F Brooks, 19 May 2017.
SVC FIXED THIS ON 8 MAY 2020. GOOD CATCH!

QFE: The Salvage column should be 1.750 as there's just one unit being described. F Brooks, 19 May 2017.
SVC FIXED THIS ON 8 MAY 2020. GOOD CATCH!

QFE: Since there is only one unit being described, the words "per ship" can be removed from the Notes column. F Brooks, 19 May 2017.
SVC FIXED THIS ON 8 MAY 2020.

3QFE: The Notes column needs a bit of work, as it's a leftover from when the QFE and 3QFE were defined in one row on the SIT. F Brooks, 19 May 2017.
SVC REVIEWED THIS ON 8 MAY 2020. IT IS OKAY AS IS.

By Ken Kazinski (Kjkazinski) on Saturday, February 29, 2020 - 11:21 am: Edit

Page 11 SAC The build substation cost is 2 with no other information.
8 MAY 2020: SVC HAS NO IDEA WHAT THIS MEANS.

Page 12 BS (FP) [With fighters and gunboats] "From: BS(F): 2+¶" should be "From BS(F): 2+¶"
8 MAY 2020 SVC DELETED THE EXTRA COLON

Page 13 BTX (N) [No fighters/ gunboats] "From: BSX(N): 3" should be "From BSX(N): 3"
8 MAY 2020 SVC DELETED THE EXTRA COLON

BTX (F) [with fighters] "From: BSX(F): 3 From: BTX(N): 2+6" should be "From BSX(F): 3 From BTX(N): 2+6"
8 MAY 2020 SVC DELETED THE EXTRA COLON

BTX (FP) [with fighters and gunboats] "From: BSX(F): 5+¶ From: BSX(FP): 3 From: BTX(N): 4+6+¶ From: BTX(F): 2+¶" should be "From BSX(F): 5+¶ From BSX(FP): 3 From BTX(N): 4+6+¶ From BTX(F): 2+¶"
8 MAY 2020 SVC DELETED THE EXTRA COLON

Page 18 PDU "From PGB (441.3)" should be "From PGB: (441.3)"
SVC FIXED THIS 8 MAY 2020

By Ken Kazinski (Kjkazinski) on Tuesday, March 03, 2020 - 12:13 am: Edit

Page 18 "Marine" should be "Marine **". The web site changed the "stars" into their Unicode values.
SVC FIXED THIS ON 6 MAY 2020

By Nick Samaras (Koogie) on Monday, May 08, 2017 - 10:53 pm: Edit

ITEM DEALT WITH AFTER MAY 2020 UPDATE, Y159 IS OFFICIAL DATE. VERY LIMITED NUMBERS MIGHT HAVE BEEN AVAILABLE EARLIER BUT ARE IRRELEVANT IN GAME TERMS.

FTL: YIS should not be before Y159 (no warp). (Nick Samaras, May 8, 2017)

FTS: YIS should not be before Y159 (no warp). (Nick Samaras, May 8, 2017)

SAS: YIS should not be before Y159 (no warp). (Nick Samaras, May 8, 2017)

By Chuck Strong (Raider) on Thursday, May 07, 2020 - 06:20 am: Edit

DONE AFTER MAY 2020 UPDATE AS THE LOST REPORT WAS NOT NOTICED. I DON'T THINK THIS IS IMPORTANT ENOUGH TO REUPLOAD AS THE COUNTERS DON'T EXIST YET.

Queen Eagles: All salvage values of the QPE, PCE, QFE should be changed to 2.000. Rationale: With the base hull production costs changed to 8 EP, FEDS missed updating these values. FEDS apologizes for failing to catch this oversight on the Pink Sheet report to ADB. FEDS - 7 May 2020

By Thomas Mathews (Turtle) on Thursday, May 07, 2020 - 06:20 am: Edit

DONE BY SVC

JH: Notes: Add battle group symbol to notes. This ship is a heavy frigate. It gains both size and firepower over the SEH frigates and is not subject to shock like some other heavy frigates of other empires. Thomas Mathwes 7 May 2020. Note: I have always assumed that the JH was battle group eligible to begin with.
FEDS: Concurs with adding BG symbol.
SVC CONFIRMS THAT THIS GOT DONE SOEMTIME BUT ISN'T REALLY SURE WHEN.

Rom Heavy Frigate: JH: Salvage value should be 0.750; build cost is 3 EP x 25%. FEDS - 14 May 2020
THIS GOT DONE AFTER THE MAY 2020 UPDATE AND ISN'T IMPORTANT ENOUGH TO RE-UPLOAD THE FILE.

By Richard Eitzen (Rbeitzen) on Thursday, May 07, 2020 - 07:41 pm: Edit

THIS WAS DONE BUT OTHER DATA IN THAT CELL MAY BE WRONG.

KRG says 1 to convert from KR?. This should probably be 3 to convert from KR/KR7, 3 to convert from D6G and 6 to convert from D6/D7 (if that should even be allowed). Rational: No discount for doing an empire conversion plus a normal conversion. Eitzen 5/7/20

<FONT COLOR="119911"><B>FEDS: Concurs. Additionally, the KRG adds a double 'G' so the cost of conversion for the KRG from KR is 3 EP as support by rule:

<BLOCKQUOTE><HR SIZE=0><!-Quote-!><FONT SIZE=1>Quote:</FONT><P>(521.23) EXTRACT
...Each player can also convert one other ship per turn to the ground combat version of the same hull type for a cost of 2 points (3 points for ships with GG ratings).<!-/Quote-!><HR SIZE=0></BLOCKQUOTE></B></FONT>

By Frank Brooks (Alskdjf) on Friday, May 19, 2017 - 09:21 pm: Edit

FAE: There should be a "+" after the "12" in "12¶" in the Conversion Cost and Build Cost columns (four occurrences total). F Brooks, 19 May 2017.
SVC DID THIS ON 8 MAY 2020

GHA: The SFB Ref # should be R4.135. F Brooks, 19 May 2017
SVC DID THIS ON 8 MAY 2020

HDWK: Should the "7-7(1)" part of the Factors column be just "7(1)"? F Brooks, 19 May 2017.
SVC CHECKED THIS ON 8 MAY 2020 AND IT ALREADY SAID THAT.

By Chuck Strong (Raider) on Monday, May 18, 2020 - 05:41 am: Edit

DONE AFTER MAY 2020 UPDATE, NOT WORTH REUPLOADING.

Romulan:
KING CONDOR BATTLESHIP: KCN, KSL
KESTRAL: K10

FEDS recommends adding the statement "Single-Ship Carrier" to the SIT notes for all of the above single-ship carrier Battleships. Rationale: On 20 Jan 2020, in the F&E Q&A Discussions section; SVC reconfirmed that the B10 (with four fighter factors) is a single ship carrier. In addition, the above battleships also have four or less fighter factors and do not have the notation while the Feds and ISC do have the notes.
FED - 18 MAY 2020

By Chuck Strong (Raider) on Monday, May 18, 2020 - 05:53 am: Edit

ALL DONE POST UPDATE MAY 2020
NOT WORTH A REUPLOAD

ROM BHG: Command Rating form MSC is 6. FEDS 18 MAY 2020

ROM JAP: YIS is Y182F. Per (526.41) Empires can begin production of Aux PFTs on the same turn as they can produce regular PFTs, (i.e., the second turn of PF deployment for that empire). FEDS 18 MAY 2020

ROM SAP: the YIS Y180 is incorrect, recommend changing to Y182. FEDS 18 MAY 2020

By Steve Cole (Stevecole) on Friday, May 08, 2020 - 03:05 pm: Edit

ITEMS DONE AFTER MAY 2020 UPDATE.

POL REMOVE the redundant "Call up:" in the build column. FEDS - 18 MAY 2020

SNV Backporting Paravian style PV call up frequency: Build "Call up: 3 (1/Fall)" - Howard Bampton 2017-05-07
FEDS: CONCURS.

By Steve Cole (Stevecole) on Friday, May 29, 2020 - 04:26 pm: Edit

THESE ITEMS WERE PROCESSED DURING MAY 2020

KRT: Needs conversion from TGA? (Nick Samaras, April 30, 2017)
SAME AS FROM TGB; SO NOTED.

By Steve Cole (Stevecole) on Tuesday, May 05, 2020 - 06:20 pm: Edit

ALL FIXES MADE BY SVC 1 JUNE 2020

QFE Build cost should probably be defined. Suggest "For WE: 9" Staff? - Howard Bampton 2017-04-27
FEDS: Build cost should be: For WE: 8 ; Salvage 2.000 Add to Notes: Limit 1 KE/QE conversion (including variants) from WE per turn. Rationale: QE is the base hull. - 31 May 2020

3QFE This is a group of three ship. Suggest following the established SITs practice of listing as follows: Size as 'Group"; Conversions: "Individual Ships" Build as "Individual Ships" Salvage as:"Ships". Rationale: Recommend removing group conversions altogether due to WE hull conversion limit of ONE WE hull conversion to KE/QE (and variants) per turn. - 31 May 2020

QCE Build cost seems too low. CE is same cost as WE. Should this be 9? Staff? - Howard Bampton 2017-04-27
FEDS: Build cost should be: For WE: 8 ; Salvage 2.000 Add to Notes: Limit 1 KE/QE conversion (including variants) from WE per turn. Rationale: QE is the base hull. - 31 May 2020

QPE Build cost seems much too low. PE is 5 more than WE due to SR surcharge. This should be 14 based upon that (note that current cost of 9 makes it cheaper than PE that it is based upon). Staff? - Howard Bampton 2017-04-27
FEDS: Build cost should be: For WE: 14 (QE base cost 8 EP + 6EP for survey ship with 3EW) ; Salvage 2.000 Add to Notes: Limit 1 KE/QE conversion (including variants) from WE per turn. Rationale: QE is the base hull. - 31 May 2020

By Ryan Opel (Ryan) on Wednesday, January 17, 2018 - 08:03 pm: Edit

FIXED BY SVC 1 JUNE 2020

FHF: Needs shock reference. Shock = 5-6 Ryan J Opel 17 Jan 2018 {FEAR concurs. FHP is listed in the MSSB as a special mauler with a limited breakdown due to the center line mauler, while the FHF is classified as a normal mauler and SFB rule D23.1 classifies all maulers are subject to shock.}

FEDS: Recommend removing shock roll notation in notes section. Rationale: It is true that the standard shock roll of this mauler is '5-6'; since it has a standard shock roll, the there is no requirement to list the shock roll in the notes section.

By Nick Samaras (Koogie) on Sunday, April 30, 2017 - 06:32 pm: Edit

SVC MADE THE REMAINING FIXES 1 JUNE 2020

K5W: Conversion from F5W should be 2, not 1, same as the F5->K5 and F5L-> K5L cost. Need conversion from K5/K5L. Needs battle group symbol. (Nick Samaras, April 30, 2017)
FEDS: ADB did the needed conversions; Add battlegroup symbol § in notes section. - 31 MAY 2020

KEW: Need conversion from K5/K5L, F5/F5L. Needs battle group symbol. (Nick Samaras, April 30, 2017)
FEDS: ADB did the needed conversions; Add battlegroup symbol § in notes section. - 31 MAY 2020

KVW: Need conversion from F5/F5L, F5W, K5/K5L. (Nick Samaras, April 30, 2017)
FEDS: ADB did the needed conversions; no further action required. - 31 MAY 2020

KXW: Need conversion from F5/F5L, FX, K5X. Needs battle group symbol. (Nick Samaras, April 30, 2017)
FEDS: ADB did the needed conversions; Add battlegroup symbol § in notes section. Correct build cost to read: For SK 10 salvage 2.500. Rationale: this is a base 10 X-ship and established X-ship production practices requires 10 XTP to build. - 31 MAY 2020

KGW: Need conversion from F5/F5L, F5W, K5/K5l. There is no K5G to convert from. Needs battle group symbol. (Nick Samaras, April 30, 2017)
FEDS: ADB did the needed conversions and added the missing K5G; Add battlegroup symbol § in notes section. - 31 MAY 2020

By Nick Samaras (Koogie) on Sunday, April 30, 2017 - 06:35 pm: Edit

SVC DID THE FIXES IN MAY 2020

K5L: Needs conversion from F5: (Nick Samaras, April 30, 2017)
FEDS: ADB did the needed conversions; no further action required. - 31 MAY 2020

K5S: Needs conversion from F5, F5S. (Nick Samaras, April 30, 2017)
FEDS: ADB did the needed conversions; no further action required. - 31 MAY 2020

K5D: Needs conversion from F5, F5E. (Nick Samaras, April 30, 2017)
FEDS: ADB did the needed conversions; no further action required. - 31 MAY 2020

K5X: Needs conversion from FX, F5, and F5L. (Nick Samaras, April 30, 2017)
FEDS: ADB did the needed conversions; no further action required. - 31 MAY 2020

KSX: Needs conversion from F5, FX, FSX, and F5S. (Nick Samaras, April 30, 2017)
FEDS: ADB did the needed conversions; no further action required. - 31 MAY 2020

By Nick Samaras (Koogie) on Sunday, April 30, 2017 - 06:39 pm: Edit

SVC MADE ALL FIXES 1 JUNE 2020

BHG: Conversion cost should be 2 (minimum commando cost conversion). Needs battle group symbol. (Nick Samaras, April 30, 2017)
FEDS:Add Command rating 6; add missing battlegroup symbol. - 31 MAY 2020

HAV: YIS should be Y165? (Nick Samaras, April 30, 2017)
FEDS: Change YIS to Y165 per SFB MSC. - 31 MAY 2020

Rom FRD: YIS should be Y139 with other empires? (Nick Samaras, April 30, 2017)
FEDS: I'm not sure if the Roms had FRDs in Y139 -- I defer to SPP for Rom pre-warp era historical data.

PFM: YIS should be Y182 (Rom PF date). (Nick Samaras, April 30, 2017)
FEDS: Change YIS to Y181F per 600.2 and OOB. - 31 MAY 2020

HFM: YIS should be Y179 (Rom heavy fighter date). (Nick Samaras, April 30, 2017)
FEDS: Concurs; change to Y179 on SIT.

By Gary Carney (Nerroth) on Monday, May 18, 2020 - 04:37 pm: Edit

Romulan HDWC: The 24 April 2017 SIT lists the Command Rating as 7; this should be 10, to comply with (525.23C). - Gary Carney, 18 May 2020
FEDS: ADB already did this. - 31 MAY 2020

Romulan HDWQ: The 24 April 2017 SIT does not include a provisional listing for this mission configuration; could a line entry be added to the upcoming SIT revision? - Gary Carney, 18 May 2020
FEDS: ADB already did this. - 31 MAY 2020

THAT WAS DONE YEARS AGO. SEE REPORTS PROCESSED EARLIER. LOTS OF UPDATES WERE DONE BUT NOT YET POSTED.

By Chuck Strong (Raider) on Sunday, May 31, 2020 - 06:41 am: Edit

SVC MADE ALL FIXES, CORRECTED ONE, DID TWO MORE. 1 JUNE 2020

ROM HDW: Correct conversion to read: From SK 1.5+1. Rationale: This show the cost of the standard HDW conversion before a mission modifier. - 31 MAY 2020

ROM HDWC: Change NOTES to read: HDW Flagship mode; size 3 § - 31 MAY 2020

Rom HDWE: The crippled half triangle factor needs to be in parentheses (0.5). Correct: conversion of SKE to read: From SKE: 1.5 + 1; Notes to read: Heavy Escort mode; size 3 §. - 31 May 2020

Rom HDWF: Change prod to read: AO. Change NOTES to read: Repair mode; size 3 §; field repair 4. - 31 MAY 2020

Rom HDWG: Change NOTES to read: Commando mode; size 3 §.- 31 MAY 2020

Rom HDWH: Change NOTES to read: Heavy Fighter Medium Carrier mode. - 31 MAY 2020

Rom HDWK: Change: build cost to read: For SK: 5+1; Notes to read: Combat mode; size 3 §. Rationale: (525.211) If a HDW is built configured for any mission (525.23) except K-Combat, the cost of the reconfiguration is paid at the time of construction. Add battlegroup symbol. FEDS - 31 MAY 2020

Rom HDWP: Change NOTES to read: PFT mode; Scout; (2EW:4AF, 1EW:6AF). - 31 May 2020

Rom HDWQ: Change prod to read: AO. Change YIS to read: Y180. Change NOTES to read: Survey mode, (525.23Q), Scout (2EW:4AF)(1EW:6AF). Limit 1 HDWQ or HWXQ in service. - 31 MAY 2020

Rom HDWR: Change NOTES to read: Forward Carrier Resupply mode, size 3 §; not an escort. - 31 MAY 2020

Rom HDWS: Change NOTES to read: Scout mode, (2EW:4AF)(1EW:6AF); size 3 § . - 31 MAY 2020

Rom HDWT: Change YIS to read: Y180. Salvage should read: 1.250. Change NOTES to read: Theater Transport mode; carries 5 EPs; cannot carry pods.- 31 MAY 2020

Rom HDWV: Change NOTES to read: Medium Carrier mode . - 31 MAY 2020

Correct HDW Packages:
Rom HDW COG prod is AO
Rom HDW FOP prod is AO
Rom HDW HOG prod is AO
Rom HDW POG prod is AO - 31 May 2020

Rom HWXH: Remove "G" factors. Change conversion to read: From SKX: 3+1+HOG (SKX conversion 2+ mission 1 + 1 For). Change NOTES to read: Heavy Fighter Medium Carrier mode; X–Ship. - 31 MAY 2020

Rom HWXP: Change NOTES to read: PFT mode; X–Ship; Scout; (2EW:4AF)(1EW:6AF)(Crippled:1EW) - 31 May 2020

Rom HWXQ: Change prod to read: AO. Change NOTES to read: Survey mode (525.23Q); Scout; (2EW:4AF)(1EW:8AF)(Crippled:1EW). Limit 1 HDWQ or HWXQ in service. - 31 MAY 2020

Rom HWXR: Add to NOTES: ;not an escort. - 31 May 2020

Rom HWXT: Change NOTES to read: Theater Transport mode; X-Ship; carries 5 EPs; cannot carry pods. - 31 May 2020

Rom HWXV: Change NOTES to read: Medium Carrier mode; X–Ship. - 31 May 2020

By Chuck Strong (Raider) on Monday, June 01, 2020 - 05:28 am: Edit

SVC DID THIS 1 JUNE 2020 BUT IT DOESNT SOUND RIGHT.

Rom ALL HWXs: Reference is: 212. ALL YIS dates: Y186. - 31 May 2020

FEDS Reply: Data is confirmed using Module G3 SABX (HDWX).