Subtopic | Posts | Updated |
By Steve Cole (Stevecole) on Thursday, December 05, 2024 - 02:52 pm: Edit |
Soeren, you can do that here.
By Steve Cole (Stevecole) on Thursday, December 05, 2024 - 03:23 pm: Edit |
You might as well get me a list of every Klingon counter without a corresponding KR counter.
By Lawrence Bergen (Lar) on Friday, December 06, 2024 - 02:13 pm: Edit |
Just to bring the K4V and K5V discussion full circle, the staff and SVC agreed to include these two missing KR hulls on VULKAN. See post in that thread on June 2. (It includes factors)
By Mike Erickson (Mike_Erickson) on Friday, December 06, 2024 - 02:32 pm: Edit |
Thx! VULKAN is at:
Federation & Empire: F&E INPUT: F&E Countersheet projects: F&E FIGHTER OPS - VULKAN 2024 (2 Sheets)
--Mike
By Stewart Frazier (Frazikar3) on Friday, December 06, 2024 - 07:52 pm: Edit |
Both (K5V/K4V) on Vulkan at D7/D8 …
By Soeren Klein (Ogdrklein) on Saturday, December 07, 2024 - 12:01 am: Edit |
SVC,
thanks for setting up this thread.
I am happy to find people seing merit in this proposal.
The first part is easy done: posting a list of missing units that I deem useful for a longer game with only KR-series ships.
Also, thanks for the hint with the K4V and K5V. They where not there, back then when I wrote my scenario proposal.
With those two being added, I may have to revise my proposal and the changes I made to compensate for their absence in 2022.
By Soeren Klein (Ogdrklein) on Saturday, December 07, 2024 - 12:14 am: Edit |
Here comes the list:
K4 Variants:
K4, K4D and K4F already there
K4-SC | K4S | u | missing | E4S | 2-4u/1-2 |
K4-CVE | K4V | 3-4(3)/1-2(1.5) | FO VULCAN | E4V | 3-4(3)/1-2(1.5) |
K4-TT | K4H | missing | E4T | 1-4U/0-2 | |
K4-X | K4X | missing | E4X | 6/3 | |
K4-Troup | K4G | GG | missing | E4G | 2-4G/1-2 |
By Soeren Klein (Ogdrklein) on Saturday, December 07, 2024 - 12:15 am: Edit |
K5 Destroyer variants:
K5, K5L, K5S,K5D,K5X and KSX already there.
K5-TT | K4H | missing | F5T | 2-5U/1-3 | |
K5-FCR | K4F | [6] | missing | F5R | 2-5[6]escort/1-3 |
K5-PFT | K5Y | (4H) | ??? | ||
K5V | 4-5(4)/2-3(2) | FO VULCAN | FV | 4-5(4)/2-3(2) |
By Soeren Klein (Ogdrklein) on Saturday, December 07, 2024 - 12:16 am: Edit |
K5W war destroyer variants
K5W, KEW, KVW, KXW, KGW already there.
K5W-SC | KSW | u | missing | ||
K5W-PFT | KYW | pu | missing | FWY | 3-6πu/1-3π |
K5W-SCX | KXWS | u | missing | FWSX | 6-9u/3-5u |
By Soeren Klein (Ogdrklein) on Saturday, December 07, 2024 - 12:18 am: Edit |
KF6 Heavy Frigate variants:
KF6 | 7/4 | published | F6 | 7S/3 | |
KF6-Escort | K6D | missing | F6E | 5-7escort/2-4escort | |
KF6-SC | K6S | u | missing | F6S | 4-7u/2-4 |
By Soeren Klein (Ogdrklein) on Saturday, December 07, 2024 - 12:20 am: Edit |
KDR Light Cruiser variants:
KDR, KDV, KDA and KDS already there.
KDR-LTT | KDH | missing | D5H | 6-7/3-4 | |
KDR-CVH | (8H) | missing | D5VH | 6-7(8H)/3-4(4H) | |
KDR-CVP | (9) | missing | D5U | 3-7(9)/1-4(4▲) | |
KDR-CSV | u(8H) | missing | D5B | 3-7u(8H)/1-4(4H) | |
KDR-PFT | KDP | (P) | missing | D5P | 5-7Pu/2-4P |
KDR-X | KDX | u | missing | D5X | 10/5 |
KDR-SCX | KDS | u | missing | D5SX | 7-10u/3-5u |
KDR-Troup | KDG | GG | missing | D5G | 2-7G/1-4G |
KDR-Mauler | KDM | + | missing | MD5 | 7✛/4 |
KDR-Fast | FKD | F | missing | FD5 | 6-7F/3-4 |
By Soeren Klein (Ogdrklein) on Saturday, December 07, 2024 - 12:26 am: Edit |
KWR New Heavy Cruiser
KWR, KWS and KWV already there.
KWR-LTT | KWH | missing | |||
KWR-Escort | KWA | missing | ADW | 7-8escort/3-4escort | |
KWR-CVH | KWVH | (8H) | missing | D5VH | |
KWR-CVP | (9) | missing | |||
KWR-DCS | u(6P) | missing | DWU | 4-8P(6)u/2-4P(3) | |
KWR-PFT | KWP | u(P) | missing | DWP | 6-8Pu/3-4P |
KWR-CSV | u(8H) | missing | DWB | 3-8u(8H)/1-4(4H) | |
KWR-Troup | KWG | GG | missing | DWG | 3-8GT/1-4G |
KWR-Mauler | KWM | + | missing | MDW | 9+/4 |
KWR-X | KWX | missing | D5WX | 12/6 | |
KWR-Fast | FKW | F | missing | FDW | 7-8F/3-4 |
By Soeren Klein (Ogdrklein) on Saturday, December 07, 2024 - 12:28 am: Edit |
K7 Battlecruiser variants:
KRC, K7R, K7V and K7X already there.
KR-CCH | KRW | missing | D7W | 10-9/5 | |
KR-Fast | FKR | F | missing | FD7 | 7-8F/4 |
K7VH | (8H) | missing | D7VH | ||
K7R-ACS | KRU | u(8H6) | missing | D7U | 4-9u(8H6)/2-5(4H3) |
K7R-DCS | UKR | P(6)u | missing | UD7 | 5-9P(6)u/3-5P(3) |
By Soeren Klein (Ogdrklein) on Saturday, December 07, 2024 - 12:28 am: Edit |
KCR Heavy Battlecruiser variants:
KCR | 11/6 | published | C7 | 10/5 | |
KC7V | KCV | (6) | missing | C7V | 10(6)/5(3) |
KC7S | KCS | (6P) | missing | C7S | 10(3P)/5(1,5P) |
By Soeren Klein (Ogdrklein) on Saturday, December 07, 2024 - 12:29 am: Edit |
KC9 Dreadnought variants:
KC9 and KC10 already there.
KC9V | (12) | missing | C8V | 10-12(12)/5-6(6) | |
KC9S | (6P) | missing | C8S | 10-12(6P)/5-6(3P) | |
KC9P | (P) | missing | |||
KC9-Mauler | KC9M | + | missing | ||
KC10V | (8H6) | missing | C10V | 11-14(8H6)/6-7(4H3) |
By Soeren Klein (Ogdrklein) on Saturday, December 07, 2024 - 12:31 am: Edit |
K10 Battleship variants:
K10, K10V, K10S already there.
K10P | (P) | missing | |||
K10-Mauler | K10M | + | missing |
By Soeren Klein (Ogdrklein) on Saturday, December 07, 2024 - 12:48 am: Edit |
Please note that:
- proposed factors in the third colum list only the mission specific factors (fighter, mauler, fast, i.e.). No combat or defense factors yet.
- klingon originals listed for reference next to the missing KR-series warship variants. If none is listed, then there isn't one.
- KC5 fast dreadnought, KE5, KE6, KE7, KRT Tug and KR heavy cruisers are not list because they are already in the game.
- HDWs would use existing romulan counters as they have the same factors like klingon ones.
- the romulan star empire is a big mauler user (three builts allowed per turn), therefore the proposed big maulers.
- within the Hawk-series they tried to max out the number of fighters on their cruiser hulls. Therefore I proposed CVP (patrol carrier) varianst of the KWR and KDR. I imagined they would find a way to make room for 3 more fighter factors, but no CVD version of the KWR because of the top mounted engine.
- K5Y is just a crazy idea. Romulans are late to the PF game in Y182 and might try this out to compensate and max out their fighters.
- B8, B9, penal units and stasis variants are ignored as they are klingon specialties.
Hope I didn't confuse anyone.
Thoughts? Corrections? Grave errors?
Mit freundlichen Grüßen,
Soeren Klein
By Warren Mathews (Turtle) on Saturday, December 07, 2024 - 09:28 am: Edit |
KB9 Fast Battleship
KB9 | ?F(4)/ ?(2) | missing | B9 | 16F (40)/8(2) |
KB9- | ?F/? | missing | B9- | 16F8 |
By Mike Grafton (Mike_Grafton) on Saturday, December 07, 2024 - 12:08 pm: Edit |
You skipped Minesweepers.
By Gary Carney (Nerroth) on Saturday, December 07, 2024 - 12:39 pm: Edit |
There are a few more hull types and design variants from SFB Module X1, Module X1R, and elsewhere that might be of relevance here.
For example, I noted in the other thread that the Klingons have a D5PX: this would be a necessary substitute for the historical SPEX during the latter portion of the Andromedan War.
Also, there would likely be a Romulan equivalent of the Klingon DX, since neither the King Eagle-X nor the NovaHawk-X would exist in this setup. Not least in order to make sure that Rolandus has a suitable flagship for use during the Romulan Civil War and the ISC intervention at Tibernia IV.
In the longer term, the historical Klingons and Romulans are due to get HWXs (advanced technology heavy war destroyers) in F&E at some point. Although, if your suggestion to use Romulan HDW counters to cover the use of would-be Kestrel HDWs, perhaps the same would apply here also.
And another re-iteration from the other thread: while the actual fast patrol ships used here would likely be K1 gunboats, there would be no need to treat them differently to Centurions or StarHawks in F&E terms.
-----
To go further back in the timeline a little bit: I would also suggest considering adding SIT entries for certain Middle Years designs - to include the proposed KC6R.
Beyond their (more limited) use in a "regular Smarba" timeline, having such Middle Years designs might make it easier to set up an "early Smarba" scenario, akin to the "early warp" timelines provided in SFB Module R4J.
Indeed, one could even throw in a Kestrel conversion of the ill-fated Klingon LD5 - which, despite the "-L" designation, was in fact a Middle Years design. I could certainly picture an "early Smarba" Klingon Empire deciding to off-load these hulls to the Romulans, with the latter only learning of their maintenance problems after the sale had been made...
By Steve Cole (Stevecole) on Saturday, December 07, 2024 - 03:12 pm: Edit |
F&E has no minesweepers.
By Soeren Klein (Ogdrklein) on Saturday, December 07, 2024 - 11:37 pm: Edit |
Warren,
indeed, i hav to agree. Haven't thought about that.
Gary,
agreed on the KD5PX you suggest.
And your idea with getting rid of those failed one-off designs and the romulan empire taking them for study is intriguing.
Mit freundlichen Grüßen,
Soeren Klein
Administrator's Control Panel -- Board Moderators Only Administer Page | Delete Conversation | Close Conversation | Move Conversation |