View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
mjwest Commodore
![](images/avatars/gallery/fed_command/romkrlogo_new.jpg)
Joined: 08 Oct 2006 Posts: 4078 Location: Dallas, Texas
|
Posted: Thu Dec 30, 2010 7:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
A few points ...
The point of storeylf's change is not to address any potential "plasma problem". Rather, the point is to correct a starting imbalance that has shown to cause problems. It is a "fairness" issue, as much as anything.
This would only add a second arming option for plasma. Right now, they start (not optional; it is just how they start) with one turn of arming and armed Pl-F. This would simply give a secondary option where all heavy plasma have two turns of arming at the cost of empty batteries at the start of the game. Note that this only applies to heavy plasma (and, therefore, only to ships that are so armed). It is also an option. It does not have to be taken.
This potential change would only be that specific item. Any other requests or changes would be examined and considered independently. The reason is that any other change is likely in response to the stated "plasma problem", while this change is not. _________________
Federation Commander Answer Guy |
|
Back to top |
|
![](templates/subSilver/images/spacer.gif) |
pmiller13 Lieutenant JG
![](images/avatars/gallery/fed_command/Warbird.jpg)
Joined: 12 May 2009 Posts: 64
|
Posted: Thu Dec 30, 2010 9:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
It does have to be pointed out that like other weapons the batteries used to arm that second turn of arming would not exceed the energy actually needed. For example a King Eagle would only need to start a battle with 2 less power in the batteries. I hate to point this out as it seems very obvious but why wait for errors to creep in? |
|
Back to top |
|
![](templates/subSilver/images/spacer.gif) |
mjwest Commodore
![](images/avatars/gallery/fed_command/romkrlogo_new.jpg)
Joined: 08 Oct 2006 Posts: 4078 Location: Dallas, Texas
|
Posted: Thu Dec 30, 2010 10:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
pmiller13 wrote: | It does have to be pointed out that like other weapons the batteries used to arm that second turn of arming would not exceed the energy actually needed. For example a King Eagle would only need to start a battle with 2 less power in the batteries. I hate to point this out as it seems very obvious but why wait for errors to creep in? |
Any change would be modeled on those that have gone before, so, yes, those items would be included. _________________
Federation Commander Answer Guy |
|
Back to top |
|
![](templates/subSilver/images/spacer.gif) |
Nerroth Fleet Captain
![](images/avatars/390136319533996369ec2d.png)
Joined: 08 Oct 2006 Posts: 1744 Location: Ontario, Canada
|
Posted: Thu Dec 30, 2010 10:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
For my part, I'd be interested to see how this goes, if only for the knock-on effect it will have on Trobrin implosion torpedoes; I've tried to model their pre-game arming on Alpha plasma equivalents, so a change here would lead me to edit the WIP rules for ITs.
I would agree that the amount of energy reduced from the batteries be equal to the energy required for the second turn of arming only; one would assume that, prior to the start of the scenario, the arming ship would have had two "turns" in which to get their pre-arming done. _________________ FC Omega Discussion (v3)
FC LMC Discussion |
|
Back to top |
|
![](templates/subSilver/images/spacer.gif) |
Dal Downing Commander
![](images/avatars/161750976849e037d4bf8cb.gif)
Joined: 06 May 2008 Posts: 654 Location: Western Wisconsin
|
Posted: Fri Dec 31, 2010 6:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
I do not see really where it improves anything but, then again I do not see where changing the Arming of Plasma at the beginning of the game hurts anything. _________________ -Dal
"Which one of you is the Biggest, Baddest, Bootlicker of the bunch?"
"I am."
"ARCHERS!!! THAT ONE!!!!" |
|
Back to top |
|
![](templates/subSilver/images/spacer.gif) |
Targ Lieutenant SG
![](images/avatars/gallery/fed_command/ESS.jpg)
Joined: 02 Nov 2006 Posts: 125 Location: York U.K.
|
Posted: Wed Jan 05, 2011 12:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
Lee just read this thread I'm up for giving it a go next few times we us plasma, only glitch I can see straight off is how do you handle ISC ships with both Torps and PPD's? Diefinatly like the concept. |
|
Back to top |
|
![](templates/subSilver/images/spacer.gif) |
storeylf Fleet Captain
Joined: 24 Jul 2008 Posts: 1897
|
Posted: Wed Jan 05, 2011 12:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
Good point, Orions are another potential issue in that department, Plas S and photons type setup.
[edit] although thinking about it, that is already an issue for orions - Photons and hellbore, or PPD and photon etc. Presumably there is already a rule covering multiple heavy weapon types and start of game arming. |
|
Back to top |
|
![](templates/subSilver/images/spacer.gif) |
mjwest Commodore
![](images/avatars/gallery/fed_command/romkrlogo_new.jpg)
Joined: 08 Oct 2006 Posts: 4078 Location: Dallas, Texas
|
Posted: Wed Jan 05, 2011 2:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
Yeah, we hit this topic in another thread.
Using the pre-game arming is all or nothing. So, if you have plasma and photons, or photons and PPD, or PPD and plasma, you either spend the batteries and pay for the final turn of arming for all eligible weapons, or none of them.
Note that with plasma, you can never be worse than one turn of arming for Pl-G/S/R and fully armed Pl-F. _________________
Federation Commander Answer Guy |
|
Back to top |
|
![](templates/subSilver/images/spacer.gif) |
Monty Lieutenant Commander
![](images/avatars/182455906513e6e9bf0d6e.png)
Joined: 23 Aug 2007 Posts: 239
|
Posted: Tue Jan 18, 2011 4:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Will this make it to rev 6? |
|
Back to top |
|
![](templates/subSilver/images/spacer.gif) |
mjwest Commodore
![](images/avatars/gallery/fed_command/romkrlogo_new.jpg)
Joined: 08 Oct 2006 Posts: 4078 Location: Dallas, Texas
|
Posted: Tue Jan 18, 2011 4:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Yes, it will be in Rev6. _________________
Federation Commander Answer Guy |
|
Back to top |
|
![](templates/subSilver/images/spacer.gif) |
pauls Lieutenant JG
![](images/avatars/gallery/fed_command/Gorn.jpg)
Joined: 16 Jul 2007 Posts: 39
|
Posted: Mon Jan 24, 2011 3:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Sorry I've been out of the loop awhile when can rev 6 be expected. Any other spoilers on what will be included?
Thanks. |
|
Back to top |
|
![](templates/subSilver/images/spacer.gif) |
mjwest Commodore
![](images/avatars/gallery/fed_command/romkrlogo_new.jpg)
Joined: 08 Oct 2006 Posts: 4078 Location: Dallas, Texas
|
Posted: Mon Jan 24, 2011 4:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
RRB6 should be available this week, at least on e23. I don't know when the print version will be offered on the shopping cart. _________________
Federation Commander Answer Guy |
|
Back to top |
|
![](templates/subSilver/images/spacer.gif) |
Jean Site Admin
![](images/avatars/32072524548d4259c3bc46.gif)
Joined: 18 Sep 2008 Posts: 1733
|
Posted: Mon Jan 24, 2011 10:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
As soon as the e23 version is ready, the print version will be as well. _________________ Business Manager/RPG Line Editor
Amarillo Design Bureau, Inc. |
|
Back to top |
|
![](templates/subSilver/images/spacer.gif) |
|