View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Nerroth Fleet Captain
Joined: 08 Oct 2006 Posts: 1744 Location: Ontario, Canada
|
Posted: Sat Aug 27, 2011 5:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
I can't recall if I asked this elsewhere, but what BPV does a "vanilla" ISC Heavy Destoyer have in SFB? _________________ FC Omega Discussion (v3)
FC LMC Discussion |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Savedfromwhat Commander
Joined: 23 Aug 2007 Posts: 657
|
Posted: Sat Aug 27, 2011 6:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
leathernsteel wrote: | Savedfromwhat wrote: | The K7 is a 'must have ship' for me but it is not as 'needed' in my opinion as the KDR So If I only had the Choice of one Kestral it would be the KDR over the K7...Sniffle. | Well if we keep ADB in business, I don't see why eventually we all can't have both of those ships! Get yourself some mini's and get out there and run some games in public, folks'l come out of the woodwork wanting to try it out. I'm speaking from experience. |
I am no scoutdad but I have around 150 miniatures half or so painted and We play regularly in fact last time I played at my LGS it was a demo game for someone who ended up buying Academy. Hopefully will be playing all afternoon tomorrow as well. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
leathernsteel Lieutenant SG
Joined: 07 Jun 2011 Posts: 196 Location: Orlando, FL
|
Posted: Sat Aug 27, 2011 6:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
Savedfromwhat, I'm not trying to accuse you of slacking or anything like that. I want the same ships you want. Messages like that are good for folks that aren't directly involved in our conversation to give THEM ideas on how to keep the SFU alive and well. My only complaint is that I can't participate in your games!!! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Savedfromwhat Commander
Joined: 23 Aug 2007 Posts: 657
|
Posted: Sat Aug 27, 2011 6:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
Ahhh but participate we can if you try FCOnline which is actually a pretty nice tool for around 5 bucks a month. I need to reup my sub though. Btw my phones autocorrect is really ticking me off, changing realy to dealt instead of really... lame. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
leathernsteel Lieutenant SG
Joined: 07 Jun 2011 Posts: 196 Location: Orlando, FL
|
Posted: Sat Aug 27, 2011 6:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
FC online is excellent, but one of the main reasons I got into Fed Conm and SFB again, is to get away from playing games on the computer and to start interacting with real human beings face to face again. No computer can duplicate that. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Steve Cole Site Admin
Joined: 11 Oct 2006 Posts: 3833
|
Posted: Sat Aug 27, 2011 4:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Random comments
1. I regard the vulture and K7R as a lock. Debate a third choice and if there turns out to be a third card we'll go with it. If not...
2. It's not going to be the last product. Reinforcements II is entirely possible.
3. Telling me you want a ship of this many points is information that I can do nothing with. Somebody needs to go FIND a ship of that many points and I'll consider it.
4. Don't blame the KRs on me. They were on TV when I was a kid and many of you were yet to be born. _________________ The Guy Who Designed Fed Commander
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Burning Chrome Lieutenant SG
Joined: 04 Feb 2011 Posts: 118 Location: Michigan
|
Posted: Sun Aug 28, 2011 2:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
Savedfromwhat wrote: | Well since the galaxy is rightfully ours your ship designs belong to us anyway. We totally would have thought of them first, we were just busy washing our ears. |
Spoken like a true Romulan.
I only wish the screw-up in the 60s hadn't taken place and allowed the SFU to include more Klingon/Romulan conflicts.
The non-canon games we played years ago were enjoyable.
Sabre-dancing vs. Plasma-ballet.
Glorious. _________________ Suppose you were an idiot. And suppose you were a member of Congress. But then I repeat myself.-- Mark Twain
Last edited by Burning Chrome on Mon Aug 29, 2011 12:12 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
jeffery smith Lieutenant SG
Joined: 11 Oct 2006 Posts: 197 Location: Bothell,WA
|
Posted: Sun Aug 28, 2011 4:49 am Post subject: ships list for reinforcements attack |
|
|
A third Romulan ? It is a toss up between the Regalhawk and the KD5R. So since the Hawk fleet is in decent shape i will suggest the KD5R.
As for the Gorn I suggested The DBC in the Gorn Attacks thread on the legacy Board at the request of someone who's name currently escapes me. If i remember correctly it was to help deal with the Gorns Tournament problems. _________________ fun fun fun in the sun sun sun |
|
Back to top |
|
|
pinecone Fleet Captain
Joined: 03 May 2008 Posts: 1862 Location: Earth
|
Posted: Sun Aug 28, 2011 5:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The KDR would be the next "neccesary" Romulan, although not nearly as prevalent as the first two. After that, a follow-up Reinforcements attack could bring in the KWR, and the K4R. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
duxvolantis Lieutenant SG
Joined: 16 Nov 2010 Posts: 185
|
Posted: Sun Aug 28, 2011 6:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
pinecone wrote: | The KDR would be the next "neccesary" Romulan, although not nearly as prevalent as the first two. After that, a follow-up Reinforcements attack could bring in the KWR, and the K4R. |
Does anyone know what year the KDR appeared? _________________ Dux Volantis
Romulan Star Empire |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Scoutdad Commodore
Joined: 09 Oct 2006 Posts: 4754 Location: Middle Tennessee
|
Posted: Sun Aug 28, 2011 6:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
KDR: YIS - Y174 _________________ Commander, Battlegroup Murfreesboro
Department Head, ACTASF |
|
Back to top |
|
|
mjwest Commodore
Joined: 08 Oct 2006 Posts: 4075 Location: Dallas, Texas
|
Posted: Mon Aug 29, 2011 2:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
Scoutdad wrote: | KDR: YIS - Y174 |
Of course, now that I have been shown the error of my ways regarding the KWR, realize that the KWR YIS is Y175. That means that the KDR actually saw service for less than a year before being upgraded.
Which is disappointing. The fact that the KWR is "real" pretty much undercuts the viability of both ships. Bummer. _________________
Federation Commander Answer Guy |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Savedfromwhat Commander
Joined: 23 Aug 2007 Posts: 657
|
Posted: Mon Aug 29, 2011 2:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
Viability for what Mike? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
mjwest Commodore
Joined: 08 Oct 2006 Posts: 4075 Location: Dallas, Texas
|
Posted: Mon Aug 29, 2011 2:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
Savedfromwhat wrote: | Viability for what Mike? |
Justifying either one for the third Romulan ship in this module. Both are definitely worth including in Federation Commander at some point. However, with the two ships vying for a single slot that may not even exist in this product, I'm just not feeling it. _________________
Federation Commander Answer Guy |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Savedfromwhat Commander
Joined: 23 Aug 2007 Posts: 657
|
Posted: Mon Aug 29, 2011 3:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
I get that, I am just not sure there should be two ships added that are only 4 points apart in BPV. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|