| View previous topic :: View next topic   | 
	
	
	
		| Author | 
		Message | 
	
	
		pinecone Fleet Captain
  
  Joined: 03 May 2008 Posts: 1862 Location: Earth
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Thu Sep 08, 2011 8:54 pm    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				A few suggestions for other possible includes:
 
 
Gorn MCC
 
Tholian PDD
 
Tholian DW
 
Hydran LNH
 
Hydran KNH
 
Vudar DNH
 
Vudar DNL
 
Romulan UMSDSH (Ultra-Mega-Super-Demon-Smasher Hawk) | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		mjwest Commodore
  
  Joined: 08 Oct 2006 Posts: 4100 Location: Dallas, Texas
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Fri Sep 09, 2011 4:13 am    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				 	  | pinecone wrote: | 	 		  Gorn MCC
 
Tholian PDD
 
Tholian DW
 
Hydran LNH
 
Hydran KNH
 
Vudar DNH
 
Vudar DNL
 
Romulan UMSDSH (Ultra-Mega-Super-Demon-Smasher Hawk) | 	  
 
The Gorn MCC is a good suggestion, but the DBC is the likely leader because it provides a highly desired point value for fleet battles.
 
 
The Tholian leading contenders seem to be the TK5 and Pol. I can't see putting something else in there, especially if this module is used to finish out the police ships.
 
 
The two Hydran ships are HDW class ships that are specifically excluded. Yes, I know I suggested the JGP, but that was intended to be used differently (and, specifically, the actual Lyran HDW was not suggested). Besides, the JGP looks to be extremely low in priority, anyway. It has effectively fallen off the list.
 
 
The two Vudar dreadnoughts (along with the same classes for the ISC) are good candidates, but there are other, more important, "missing" ships that are ahead of them in the list.
 
 
Same with the Romulan Demonhawk. Which I thought was on the list. _________________
  
 
Federation Commander Answer Guy | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		storeylf Fleet Captain
 
  Joined: 24 Jul 2008 Posts: 1887
 
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Fri Sep 09, 2011 9:34 am    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				The intial list for Vudar shows CF first choice and the BCH second. 
 
 
I'd switch that around, The CF is already in a communique whereas the BCH has not appeared that I'm aware of. The CF is a more 'specialised' ship as well. | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		Steve Cole Site Admin
  
  Joined: 11 Oct 2006 Posts: 3840
 
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Fri Sep 09, 2011 6:49 pm    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				Guys, this is not a contest to see who can think of a ship nobody else thought of.
 
 
The point is to think of a ship that is needed more than the ships already in first and second place. _________________ The Guy Who Designed Fed Commander
 
  | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		pinecone Fleet Captain
  
  Joined: 03 May 2008 Posts: 1862 Location: Earth
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Fri Sep 09, 2011 8:38 pm    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				Okay, I just wanted to ask.  Perhaps Reinforcements 2 could inclue the T-DDP, and G-MCC and T-DW?  I'd like to see those ships eventually.
 
 
However, a note: I think the G-MCC is an important ship, and maybe it should be the second gorn in this module (or in one of the boosters).  Everyone else has their NCCs | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		Steve Cole Site Admin
  
  Joined: 11 Oct 2006 Posts: 3840
 
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Wed Jan 04, 2012 9:11 pm    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				This (assuming it will post) is the "probably final" ship selection list for Reinforcements Attack.
 
 
1	General Ground Bases #1	 Main product 1
 
2	General Ground Bases #2	 Main product 2
 
3	Federation Fast Destroyer	 Main product 3
 
4	Federation NEC	    Booster 34 escorts: 1
 
5	Klingon F6B	 Main product 4
 
6	Klingon G2	       Booster 35 Cops: 1
 
7	Klingon D5E/AD5	  Booster 34 escorts: 2
 
8	Romulan K7R	 Main product 5
 
9	Romulan Vulture	           Booster 36 Heavy: 1
 
10	Kzinti Destroyer	 Main product 6
 
11	Kzinti Police Frigate	       Booster 35 Cops: 2
 
12	Kzinti CME	  Booster 34 escorts: 3
 
13	Gorn Destroyer-Battlecruiser	 Main product 7
 
14	Gorn Cruiser-Dreadnought	           Booster 36 Heavy: 2
 
15	Gorn DNT	           Booster 36 Heavy: 3
 
16	Tholian CWE	  Booster 34 escorts: 4
 
17	Tholian TK5	 Main product 8
 
18	Tholian Police cutter	       Booster 35 Cops: 3
 
19	Orion Medium Raider	       Booster 35 Cops: 4
 
20	Hydran D7H	 Main product 9
 
21	Hydran NEC	  Booster 34 escorts: 5
 
22	Andromedan Viper	       Booster 35 Cops: 5
 
23	Andromedan SatBase	 Main product 10
 
24	Andromedan Recon Cobra	       Booster 35 Cops: 6
 
25	Lyran DND	       Booster 35 Cops: 7
 
26	Lyran JGP	 Main product 11
 
27	WYN BCH	           Booster 36 Heavy: 4
 
28	WYN CWE	  Booster 34 escorts: 6
 
29	WYN CF	 Main product 12
 
30	ISC CF or CLF	 Main product 13
 
31	ISC CLE	 Main product 14
 
32	ISC DNH	           Booster 36 Heavy: 5
 
33	ISC DNL	           Booster 36 Heavy: 6
 
34	Vudar CF	 Main product 15
 
35	Vudar BCH	           Booster 36 Heavy: 7
 
36	Vudar CWE	  Booster 34 escorts: 7
 
37	Seltorian CF	 Main product 16
 
38	Seltorian NCL	 Main product 17
 
39	Bats with Augmentations	 Main product 18
 
40	Sun Snake	 Main product 19 _________________ The Guy Who Designed Fed Commander
 
  | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		Steve Cole Site Admin
  
  Joined: 11 Oct 2006 Posts: 3840
 
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Wed Jan 04, 2012 9:16 pm    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				A few comments...
 
 
1. I'm pretty happy with this list and while I'm not saying NO CHANGES you're going to have to make an incredibly good case to get one made. Taking out a Fed ship to include a fed ship is about 0.001% possible. Taking a ship from one empire to include a ship for another empire is about 0.000001% possible.
 
 
2. We wanted to fill in gaps and missing ships. The ISC got the missing DNL and DNH. Several empires got missing police ships and missing fast ships. Some got "ships designed to hit point totals" but not many. 
 
 
3. FC players don't care much for SFB data like "this ship was never actually built" or "there was only one of these and it was only around for a year."
 
 
4. Some ships were very popular with players even if they made no sense to the staff, and you guys pay the bills, so you got what you asked for.
 
 
5. The "cops" expansion is short for "cops & raiders" but we didn't have room in the source document's column. _________________ The Guy Who Designed Fed Commander
 
  | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		Nerroth Fleet Captain
  
  Joined: 08 Oct 2006 Posts: 1722 Location: Ontario, Canada
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Wed Jan 04, 2012 10:08 pm    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				For slot 39, I might sooner request going with a Sector Base instead; it would fill the point value gap between the current BATS and SB more evenly. _________________ FC Omega Discussion (v3)
 
FC LMC Discussion | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		mjwest Commodore
  
  Joined: 08 Oct 2006 Posts: 4100 Location: Dallas, Texas
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Wed Jan 04, 2012 10:35 pm    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				The point of the BATS is to be a BATS. This card is needed to provide both squadron and fleet scale BATS. (Which is probably the most common type of combat station that would be found in the General War.) The fleet scale BATS is the "missing" ship. Giving it augmentation modules (which ones are to be seen later) helps differentiate the new BATS from the BATS in Klingon Border.
 
 
So, it does need to be a BATS. _________________
  
 
Federation Commander Answer Guy | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		djdood Commodore
  
  Joined: 01 Feb 2007 Posts: 3407 Location: Seattle, WA
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Thu Jan 05, 2012 12:12 am    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				I was wondering this myself. Thanks for the clarification. _________________
    | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		terryoc Captain
  
  Joined: 07 Oct 2006 Posts: 1384
 
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Thu Jan 05, 2012 12:25 pm    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				Somewhat tangential I suppose, but no better place to discuss it: Whatever augmentation modules are selected for the BATS, I believe that more power is needed to beef up that unit. It tends to be a bit power starved IMO. (I'm sure that someone will retort that all ships could use more power, but I think the BATS is a special case, especially when compared to the ships in FC which seem to gain more from the liberal power rules than bases do.) So I think that a power boost pod would be very valuable. _________________ "Captain" Terry O'Carroll, fourteen papers published including six best of issue
 
"Man, Terry, you are like a loophole seeking missle!" - Mike West
 
  | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		JonPerry Lieutenant SG
 
  Joined: 12 Jul 2010 Posts: 124
 
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Thu Jan 05, 2012 3:28 pm    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				I don't understand the nomenclature here.
 
 
on each of the 40 lines, you have a placeholder number, a racial name, and a ship/unit name.  Got it.
 
 
But what is - 
 
Main product 1
 
Main product 2
 
Booster 34 escorts: 1 
 
Booster 34 escorts: 2 
 
Booster 35 Cops: 2 
 
Booster 36 Heavy: 2 
 
 
supposed to mean?
 
 
I get what a booster is, and what an escort is, and a cop.  I just don't understand what it means when you put it all together. | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		mjwest Commodore
  
  Joined: 08 Oct 2006 Posts: 4100 Location: Dallas, Texas
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Thu Jan 05, 2012 3:41 pm    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				Terry,
 
 
I don't know what Steve is planning, but I want to ask for the following modules for the BATS:
 
- 1 power (for the reason you said)
 
- 1 hangar (just shuttles for everyone but the Hydrans. They get actual fighters.)
 
- 1 something else (probably the lab one).
 
 
That is just my idea. I have no idea what Steve is thinking on that, and I assume there will be a discussion about which modules to use when the time is right. I do not see how one of them won't end up being a power module, though.
 
 
Jon,
 
 
The nomenclature "Main product 2" means that this ship will be in the main product, and is the second ship in the main product. So, you will see "Main product 1" through "Main product 19".
 
 
The nomenclature "Booster 34 escorts 1" means that this ship will be in Booster 34, which is the "escorts" booster, and is the first ship in that booster. Each of the boosters gets its own identifying name to help identify its primary components. So, Booster 34 is Escorts, Booster 35 is Cops and Raiders, and Booster 36 is Heavy Ships. _________________
  
 
Federation Commander Answer Guy | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		jmt Lieutenant Commander
  
  Joined: 08 Oct 2006 Posts: 394 Location: Plano, TX
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Fri Jan 06, 2012 3:04 pm    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				I wonder if the extra module for the bats would be a repair module?  I don't know if these are in SFB yet, but the F&E crowd are very interested in getting their hits on these (forward repair facilities, donchaknow!) _________________ jmt
 
 
  | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		djdood Commodore
  
  Joined: 01 Feb 2007 Posts: 3407 Location: Seattle, WA
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Fri Jan 06, 2012 5:03 pm    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				This is for a Federation Commander product (which doesn't have repair box rules), not SFB (which already has them on the SSDs). _________________
    | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		 |