Federation Commander Forum Index Federation Commander
A NEW fast paced board game of starship combat!
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Question about base phasers (type 4, I think)

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Federation Commander Forum Index -> General Discussion
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Itharus
Lieutenant SG


Joined: 23 Aug 2014
Posts: 122
Location: California

PostPosted: Tue Oct 11, 2016 10:31 pm    Post subject: Question about base phasers (type 4, I think) Reply with quote

My question is: do any empires use these as heavy weapons on their larger (DN/BC) star ships? Just thought that would be kind of cool if any of them did.

Thanks Smile
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
djdood
Commodore


Joined: 01 Feb 2007
Posts: 3406
Location: Seattle, WA

PostPosted: Tue Oct 11, 2016 10:44 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Nope.

Phaser-4 are specifically forbidden on ships. The game fluff says they need special positional stabilizers to make them workable.

They're tailored to help things that are immobile (bases, planets) better defend themselves against things that can move around.

If you want to try them on a mobile platform, the Juggernaut "monster" uses the phaser-4 table to represent its giant energy weapons, as do some other monsters, IIRC.

[caveat: the Borak (recently introduced to FC in Captain's Log) do all kinds of odd things with phasers]
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Itharus
Lieutenant SG


Joined: 23 Aug 2014
Posts: 122
Location: California

PostPosted: Tue Oct 11, 2016 10:55 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ah, bummer Sad

I was half expecting Tholians to have something like it.


Last edited by Itharus on Tue Oct 11, 2016 11:26 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Itharus
Lieutenant SG


Joined: 23 Aug 2014
Posts: 122
Location: California

PostPosted: Tue Oct 11, 2016 11:25 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Six legged dragon things with a phaser fetish? I like.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
djdood
Commodore


Joined: 01 Feb 2007
Posts: 3406
Location: Seattle, WA

PostPosted: Tue Oct 11, 2016 11:47 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The Tholians have tricks enough, with web, cast web, web fist, etc. There's more rules to cover their gimmicks than any other single empire.
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Scoutdad
Commodore


Joined: 09 Oct 2006
Posts: 4751
Location: Middle Tennessee

PostPosted: Wed Oct 12, 2016 1:15 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

ACTASF Book II web rules are 6 pages long... with no illustrations or examples included yet.
And the Webcaster / Web Fist is separate.
_________________
Commander, Battlegroup Murfreesboro
Department Head, ACTASF
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Yahoo Messenger
mjwest
Commodore


Joined: 08 Oct 2006
Posts: 4091
Location: Dallas, Texas

PostPosted: Wed Oct 12, 2016 2:50 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Wow. In Federation Commander, web rules (including snares, but not web casters) is five and a half pages. Even ugly rules like tractors are only two and a quarter pages.

So, yes, the Tholian web device is probably the nastiest rule in all of the Star Fleet Universe, irrespective of rules set.
_________________

Federation Commander Answer Guy
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
djdood
Commodore


Joined: 01 Feb 2007
Posts: 3406
Location: Seattle, WA

PostPosted: Wed Oct 12, 2016 3:55 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Sooooo many interactions. It's both imposed terrain and a damage cause-er - and that's just basic, "as seen on tv" laid web.

The SFB group I was in shied away from Tholians because of it (and because maneuver fights were more fun to us). I was very happy when things got streamlined for FC and looking forward to seeing what Tony is doing for ACTASF.
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Scoutdad
Commodore


Joined: 09 Oct 2006
Posts: 4751
Location: Middle Tennessee

PostPosted: Thu Oct 13, 2016 8:59 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

djdood wrote:
...and looking forward to seeing what Tony is doing for ACTASF.

Pulling my hair out!!!

Actually. They aren't too awfully bad in ACTASF.
I wrote long, detailed rules for the play testers. Just to confirm that everything works as it should and that there are no questions.

Once we're sure they work to our satisfaction, we'll remove redundant language and clean them up.
I hope to get them down to 4 or 5 pages (with examples and illustrations) ... which when formatted by ADB seems to lose about 50% of its volume.
So I guess the final goal is 2 to 2 1/2 pages in the ACTASF book. although I would not complain if it ended up at 3 pages.
_________________
Commander, Battlegroup Murfreesboro
Department Head, ACTASF
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Yahoo Messenger
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Federation Commander Forum Index -> General Discussion All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group