DorianGray wrote:We cannot have such a failure in miniature design such as the Seltorians and the Andromedians again. It just seems plain lazy for them to produce identitical ships in different sizes..
Strong words dorian. I think you could have made your point without resorting to that.
The others upthread already covered most of what I would've said. I will echo some thoughts though.
Look at modern naval ships. To the untrained-eye an
Arleigh Burke class destroyer and a
Ticonderoga class cruiser look the same. Pretty much any modern surface combatant look the same. To my mother, every ship (military or commercial) looks the same. Form follows function.
This applies to airplanes as well. Every modern airliner is pretty much a tube with a low-mounted wing, under-slung podded turbofan engines and a body-mounted tail. Most of the other configurations have died off as all the builders gravitated to the overall most-effective/efficient/most-marketable configuration. Again, form follows function.
I can't see why Klingons, or Seltorians, or purple-people-eaters would be any different. The math would always lead thinkers down similar paths.
In the end, SVC is the guy with the Professional Engineer certification and the years and years of experience as a defense analyst. I'm inclined to trust his take on how things would get done.