Klingon D5W
Moderators: mjwest, Albiegamer
- asguard101
- Lieutenant SG
- Posts: 170
- Joined: Sun Jul 20, 2008 3:00 pm
- Location: Florida
Klingon D5W
Would the D5W be the Klingon's version of a NCA?
- Steve Cole
- Site Admin
- Posts: 3846
- Joined: Wed Oct 11, 2006 5:24 pm
- asguard101
- Lieutenant SG
- Posts: 170
- Joined: Sun Jul 20, 2008 3:00 pm
- Location: Florida
-
USS Enterprise
- Lieutenant Commander
- Posts: 376
- Joined: Fri Feb 27, 2009 11:12 pm
- Location: Vulcan
The D5W is the class-equivalent of the Federation NCA, not the NCL.
The D5 (no W) is the class-equivalent of the Federation NCL.
Most people would rather take the D5 (no W) instead of the D7 because they intend to sabre-dance with it. The D5 has ridiculously wide disruptor arcs (210 degrees, instead of just 120 degrees) and one more Ph-1 (it has fewer overall phasers, but more Ph-1s). These give a big advantage in performing a sabre-dance. The weaknesses of a D5 compared to a D7 (fewer internals, fewer transporters) only matter in a close-in fight, which is intended to be avoided with maximum effort. Then add in that the D5 is significantly cheaper than the D7, and you have an easy choice.
In short, most people would take a D5 over a D7 because they plan to use its strengths and its disadvantages are irrelevant to their tactics.
The D5W is easily better than the D7 because it has all of the advantages that the D5 does, but also gets much of the "bulk" of the D7, too. I don't think anyone would bother to argue that the D5W isn't better than the D7. The only issue there is potentially the cost. I don't remember what the point value of the D5W is.
The D5 (no W) is the class-equivalent of the Federation NCL.
Most people would rather take the D5 (no W) instead of the D7 because they intend to sabre-dance with it. The D5 has ridiculously wide disruptor arcs (210 degrees, instead of just 120 degrees) and one more Ph-1 (it has fewer overall phasers, but more Ph-1s). These give a big advantage in performing a sabre-dance. The weaknesses of a D5 compared to a D7 (fewer internals, fewer transporters) only matter in a close-in fight, which is intended to be avoided with maximum effort. Then add in that the D5 is significantly cheaper than the D7, and you have an easy choice.
In short, most people would take a D5 over a D7 because they plan to use its strengths and its disadvantages are irrelevant to their tactics.
The D5W is easily better than the D7 because it has all of the advantages that the D5 does, but also gets much of the "bulk" of the D7, too. I don't think anyone would bother to argue that the D5W isn't better than the D7. The only issue there is potentially the cost. I don't remember what the point value of the D5W is.

Federation Commander Answer Guy
-
USS Enterprise
- Lieutenant Commander
- Posts: 376
- Joined: Fri Feb 27, 2009 11:12 pm
- Location: Vulcan
The D-5W is a mean machine (especially for it's cost). My main opponent swears by it (I swear at it).
His D-5W Blood Vengeance (represented by a customized ancient FASA D-22 mini) has survived at least four engagements now, by weird twists of fate.
The Fed CS seems to make a decent opponent for the D-5W. I prefer it over the NCA in that match up (but only slightly).
His D-5W Blood Vengeance (represented by a customized ancient FASA D-22 mini) has survived at least four engagements now, by weird twists of fate.
The Fed CS seems to make a decent opponent for the D-5W. I prefer it over the NCA in that match up (but only slightly).
- asguard101
- Lieutenant SG
- Posts: 170
- Joined: Sun Jul 20, 2008 3:00 pm
- Location: Florida


