Federation ships colors??

Discuss anything and everything about miniatures here.

Moderators: mjwest, Albiegamer

Cosmotiger
Ensign
Posts: 15
Joined: Mon Oct 05, 2009 8:50 pm
Location: Woodbury MN

Post by Cosmotiger »

Wolverin61 wrote:My friend in the model club told me that you can put Future floor wax on the mini where the decals are going to go before you put the decals on and they'll go down better. I bought a bottle to try it but haven't yet (since I still haven't found my decals.)
Yes, that works very well. You can airbrush or brush it as an overall gloss coat, or you can use it just on the areas where the decals will go. Brush on a thin layer and apply the decal right onto the wet Future. As the decal and the Future dry down together, any tiny air pockets under the decal film are filled... therefore no silvering.
User avatar
SWO_Daddy
Lieutenant SG
Posts: 195
Joined: Thu Feb 14, 2008 8:30 pm
Location: Stuttgart, Germany
Contact:

Post by SWO_Daddy »

I use the glosscoat - decals - microsol - dullcoat method. Usually works pretty well.

I've heard of using Future as a substitute for gloss coat, but I always assumed it was applied, then allowed to dry before doing anything with decals. Working with it while still wet sounds pretty messy. But if it works... :wink:

As for the original question, I use Testors Light Gull Grey for my Feds. No mixing, very consistent out of the bottle, holds up well to handling.
Check out my website at: http://www.jgray-sfb.com/
Image
User avatar
Scoutdad
Commodore
Posts: 4751
Joined: Mon Oct 09, 2006 6:27 pm
Location: Middle Tennessee

Post by Scoutdad »

Hmmm... go figure. I use flat paints adn a matte sealer - no gross application at all and I yet (knock on wood) to have a problem with the decals silvering... Of course, I don't use them often. Other than null numbers / names - most of the trim on mine is painted on.
Commander, Battlegroup Murfreesboro
Department Head, ACTASF
User avatar
djdood
Commodore
Posts: 3407
Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2007 5:41 am
Location: Seattle, WA
Contact:

Post by djdood »

Future is also the key-ingredient in "Magic Wash", my favorite way to add shading to a mini.
ImageImage
User avatar
djdood
Commodore
Posts: 3407
Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2007 5:41 am
Location: Seattle, WA
Contact:

Post by djdood »

Found my paint jar and notes. I've been meaning to write the mix down someplace I couldn't lose it. The internet is hard to lose...

Image

This mix is based on Paul Newitt's research, presented on the CultTVMan website.
ImageImage
User avatar
Wolverin61
Commander
Posts: 495
Joined: Sun Nov 16, 2008 2:07 am
Location: Mississippi
Contact:

Post by Wolverin61 »

Thanks for the paint formula, 'dood.
"His pattern indicates two-dimensional thinking."
Image
Cosmotiger
Ensign
Posts: 15
Joined: Mon Oct 05, 2009 8:50 pm
Location: Woodbury MN

Post by Cosmotiger »

SWO_Daddy wrote:I've heard of using Future as a substitute for gloss coat, but I always assumed it was applied, then allowed to dry before doing anything with decals. Working with it while still wet sounds pretty messy. But if it works... :wink:


It's not too messy if you use a very small amount of Future. However, that is really more like a "quick and dirty" method. Personally, I almost always airbrush the whole miniature or model and let it dry.
User avatar
Scoutdad
Commodore
Posts: 4751
Joined: Mon Oct 09, 2006 6:27 pm
Location: Middle Tennessee

Post by Scoutdad »

you know, Will... if it didn't mean stripping 60 or 70 Federation minis -I'd consider redoing all of mine in that color... but as it is; I think titanium white is the way they're gonna stay.
Commander, Battlegroup Murfreesboro
Department Head, ACTASF
User avatar
djdood
Commodore
Posts: 3407
Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2007 5:41 am
Location: Seattle, WA
Contact:

Post by djdood »

I think your ship has sailed to far to change coarse now Tony. Yours look great the way they are. I mainly needed something to keep me consistent on mine. I'm almost out of mixed-paint and I'll need to do another batch before I start my next major air-brushing binge, once the weather breaks next year (unless my secret plans for a spray booth pan out).
ImageImage
User avatar
Scoutdad
Commodore
Posts: 4751
Joined: Mon Oct 09, 2006 6:27 pm
Location: Middle Tennessee

Post by Scoutdad »

djdood wrote:I think your ship has sailed to far to change coarse now Tony. Yours look great the way they are. I mainly needed something to keep me consistent on mine. I'm almost out of mixed-paint and I'll need to do another batch before I start my next major air-brushing binge, once the weather breaks next year (unless my secret plans for a spray booth pan out).
What you really need to do is find someone in a warmer, more southern environment that has an addiction to pewter. Then you could pay this person to airbrush the base coats on all your minis and ship them back to you for the cost of a few new pieces of tin...
Commander, Battlegroup Murfreesboro
Department Head, ACTASF
User avatar
Wolverin61
Commander
Posts: 495
Joined: Sun Nov 16, 2008 2:07 am
Location: Mississippi
Contact:

Post by Wolverin61 »

Scoutdad wrote:What you really need to do is find someone in a warmer, more southern environment that has an addiction to pewter. Then you could pay this person to airbrush the base coats on all your minis and ship them back to you for the cost of a few new pieces of tin...
That's a great idea, Tony!

Now if he could only find someone that would fit the bill....
"His pattern indicates two-dimensional thinking."
Image
User avatar
Scoutdad
Commodore
Posts: 4751
Joined: Mon Oct 09, 2006 6:27 pm
Location: Middle Tennessee

Post by Scoutdad »

Wolverin61 wrote:
Scoutdad wrote:What you really need to do is find someone in a warmer, more southern environment that has an addiction to pewter. Then you could pay this person to airbrush the base coats on all your minis and ship them back to you for the cost of a few new pieces of tin...
That's a great idea, Tony!

Now if he could only find someone that would fit the bill....
:roll: hmmmm...
Commander, Battlegroup Murfreesboro
Department Head, ACTASF
User avatar
djdood
Commodore
Posts: 3407
Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2007 5:41 am
Location: Seattle, WA
Contact:

Post by djdood »

Well, I would need to not owe that someone a pair of DDF conversions first and foremost.
ImageImage
User avatar
Scoutdad
Commodore
Posts: 4751
Joined: Mon Oct 09, 2006 6:27 pm
Location: Middle Tennessee

Post by Scoutdad »

djdood wrote:Well, I would need to not owe that someone a pair of DDF conversions first and foremost.
This from SVC's post on the BBS:
Report on minis masters

Klingon F5W: Good, release on 16 Nov.

ISC BB: Good, release on 15 Feb 2010.

Andro terminator: Good, release on 15 Feb 2010.

Fed Destroyer (not sure what combinations of the four saucers): Good, release on 15 Feb 2010.

Juggy: Works fine, BUT, the "neck" is so small that it breaks in shipment, every time. I am trying to arrange to have Tony rebuild the neck.
This means that I can finally make a few DDF's of my own!
Commander, Battlegroup Murfreesboro
Department Head, ACTASF
User avatar
Wolverin61
Commander
Posts: 495
Joined: Sun Nov 16, 2008 2:07 am
Location: Mississippi
Contact:

Post by Wolverin61 »

Cool! Now we just need to get the DDF into FC.
"His pattern indicates two-dimensional thinking."
Image
Post Reply