Need a clarification on shields.

Everything SFB

Moderators: mjwest, Albiegamer

Post Reply
Millenniumfalsehood
Lieutenant JG
Posts: 32
Joined: Thu Jan 07, 2010 8:41 am
Location: Kansas, USA

Need a clarification on shields.

Post by Millenniumfalsehood »

I know, I know, I've played it this way long enough that I should have thought to ask before now.

Anyway, in the rule on damage to shields, it says the following: "Each hit on a shield checks off one box." I have interpreted this to mean "Each damage point from the weapon which hits the shield checks off one box," because I played the FASA game for a long time and this is basically how their system works.

However, I've come to question this, as a possible interpretation is that each "hit" is from a weapon, not a weapon's damage rating. In other words, each time a weapon scores a hit it only destroys one box on the SSD.

Which one is the correct interpretation? Common sense tells me the first one is the correct interpretation, but I want to be absolutely sure. It is, after all, an essential rule.
"I'm invincible!"

"You're a loony."
User avatar
djdood
Commodore
Posts: 3407
Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2007 5:41 am
Location: Seattle, WA
Contact:

Post by djdood »

One shield box is marked off, per damage point scored.
ImageImage
User avatar
Scoutdad
Commodore
Posts: 4751
Joined: Mon Oct 09, 2006 6:27 pm
Location: Middle Tennessee

Post by Scoutdad »

Will has stated it correctly. Each damage point scored by a volley disables one shield box, so if you score eight points - you mark off eight boxes. If you score 14 points, you mark off 13 boxes and do one point of burn-through, and so on.
Commander, Battlegroup Murfreesboro
Department Head, ACTASF
User avatar
mjwest
Commodore
Posts: 4103
Joined: Sun Oct 08, 2006 4:30 pm
Location: Dallas, Texas
Contact:

Post by mjwest »

Are you asking for SFB or FC?

If you are asking for SFB, there is no burn-through. If you are asking for FC, I need to move this thread.
Image
Federation Commander Answer Guy
User avatar
Scoutdad
Commodore
Posts: 4751
Joined: Mon Oct 09, 2006 6:27 pm
Location: Middle Tennessee

Post by Scoutdad »

That's what I get for opening the forums before daylight and answering a question before getting dressed for work. I didn't even notice that it was in the SFB sub-topic.
Commander, Battlegroup Murfreesboro
Department Head, ACTASF
Millenniumfalsehood
Lieutenant JG
Posts: 32
Joined: Thu Jan 07, 2010 8:41 am
Location: Kansas, USA

Post by Millenniumfalsehood »

Yeah, 'tis a SFB question. :wink: Thanks for the clarification. The term 'hit' can be a mite confusing.
"I'm invincible!"

"You're a loony."
User avatar
dharras
Lieutenant JG
Posts: 47
Joined: Fri Jul 31, 2009 6:54 pm
Location: Bristol, UK

Post by dharras »

mjwest wrote: If you are asking for SFB, there is no burn-through.
Unless you've got a good insurance policy for your ships and are playing with the optional leaky shields rule.
User avatar
mjwest
Commodore
Posts: 4103
Joined: Sun Oct 08, 2006 4:30 pm
Location: Dallas, Texas
Contact:

Post by mjwest »

dharras wrote:
mjwest wrote: If you are asking for SFB, there is no burn-through.
Unless you've got a good insurance policy for your ships and are playing with the optional leaky shields rule.
There is no burn-through. And, if using leaky shields, it works different than burn-through.
Image
Federation Commander Answer Guy
Post Reply