Federation Commander: Escalation!

The newest FC launch! Discuss the games you're playing and related information here.

Moderators: mjwest, Albiegamer

Single elimination tree or random pairings each round?

Poll ended at Tue Nov 09, 2010 6:26 pm

Single Elimination Tree
3
38%
Random Pairings
5
63%
 
Total votes: 8

User avatar
Scoutdad
Commodore
Posts: 4751
Joined: Mon Oct 09, 2006 6:27 pm
Location: Middle Tennessee

Post by Scoutdad »

Nah. It's all in good fun. I'd hate to force anyone to do something to be able to play this game.

Besides, you've given me an idea.

I am going to offer a fully painted miniature of the winning players original ship as a grand prize for winning.

Now to hope that the winner selcts a ship that already has a miniature so I'm not forced to scratch-build a one off in addition to painting it! :shock:
Commander, Battlegroup Murfreesboro
Department Head, ACTASF
User avatar
Scoutdad
Commodore
Posts: 4751
Joined: Mon Oct 09, 2006 6:27 pm
Location: Middle Tennessee

Post by Scoutdad »

Got player 11's ship this morning. Another duplication.

That leaves 5. 4 or those have responded to their emails and let me know that they'll finish their selection before Sunday.
That means we should be able to start on 11/8!

If you just want to get a jump on things, everyone can do energy Allocation for their Ship for Turn 1 and have it ready to submit when the word is given.

To maintain consistency, here's the map set-up:
Fixed map
42 x 30 hexes
The top name in the pairings will start in Hex 1701, facing at their discretion.
The bottom name will start in hex 2630, facing at their discretion.
Commander, Battlegroup Murfreesboro
Department Head, ACTASF
User avatar
Scoutdad
Commodore
Posts: 4751
Joined: Mon Oct 09, 2006 6:27 pm
Location: Middle Tennessee

Post by Scoutdad »

OK.
Moving along with the games, I have ships from all but two players... djdood and fathertaylor.
Will has let me know he'll provide his ship selection Sunday morning.
Allen I still waiting to hear from.

The games will be as follow:

FC0005 - SFU_FEAR vs. terryoc - moderator: Tony Thomas
FC0006 - malisman vs. storeylf - moderator: Tony Thomas
FC0007 - mojo_jojo vs wedge...- moderator: Eric Phillips
FC0008 - ricksmith vs. scoutdad- moderator: Eric Phillips
FC0009 - fathertaylor vs Alex Knight - moderator: Terry O'Carroll
FC0010 - eric_phillips vs Krellex- moderator: Terry O'Carroll
FC0011 - plasmaboy vs USMC2USAF - moderator: Tony Thomas
FC0012 - djdood vs. scotto - moderator: Tony Thomas

The moderators will be contacting the individual players with further instructions.

Separate threads will be created for each game. Please refrain from posting ship selections in those topics until the last two are selected.
If you have any questions concerning the system or anyspecific game, please let me know.

Tony L. Thomas
Battlegroup Murfreesboro

Thanks, have fun, and it's GAME ON!
Commander, Battlegroup Murfreesboro
Department Head, ACTASF
User avatar
Scoutdad
Commodore
Posts: 4751
Joined: Mon Oct 09, 2006 6:27 pm
Location: Middle Tennessee

Post by Scoutdad »

Still waiting on ship selections from father taylor...
Commander, Battlegroup Murfreesboro
Department Head, ACTASF
User avatar
Scoutdad
Commodore
Posts: 4751
Joined: Mon Oct 09, 2006 6:27 pm
Location: Middle Tennessee

Post by Scoutdad »

Have added ship information to all matches except FC0009.
Commander, Battlegroup Murfreesboro
Department Head, ACTASF
mojo jojo
Lieutenant Commander
Posts: 340
Joined: Tue Jun 23, 2009 3:09 pm

Post by mojo jojo »

Scoutdad wrote:To maintain consistency, here's the map set-up:
Fixed map
42 x 30 hexes
The top name in the pairings will start in Hex 1701, facing at their discretion.
The bottom name will start in hex 2630, facing at their discretion.
Should it be roughly 0101 and 4230 as the starting points for the ships? I thought this was a 42X30 board. Or is it intended that we start relatively close to each other?
User avatar
Scoutdad
Commodore
Posts: 4751
Joined: Mon Oct 09, 2006 6:27 pm
Location: Middle Tennessee

Post by Scoutdad »

PBEM takes a while to complete a game, so a closer start gets into the action quicker.
Commander, Battlegroup Murfreesboro
Department Head, ACTASF
storeylf
Fleet Captain
Posts: 1887
Joined: Thu Jul 24, 2008 9:11 pm

Post by storeylf »

There are a few orions, just out of interest does the orion have to keep the same weapoon mounts throughout, or does he get to change for each game?

I'm assuming the same else they would likely gain a somewhat unfair edge tweaking weapons to suit opponent, but better check to be sure.
User avatar
Scoutdad
Commodore
Posts: 4751
Joined: Mon Oct 09, 2006 6:27 pm
Location: Middle Tennessee

Post by Scoutdad »

All ships with option mounts must keep the same load-out throughout the series to prevent said unfair advantage...
Commander, Battlegroup Murfreesboro
Department Head, ACTASF
mojo jojo
Lieutenant Commander
Posts: 340
Joined: Tue Jun 23, 2009 3:09 pm

Post by mojo jojo »

Scoutdad wrote:PBEM takes a while to complete a game, so a closer start gets into the action quicker.
Could get a little messy when it's 8 ships vs 8 ships in the finals...
User avatar
Scoutdad
Commodore
Posts: 4751
Joined: Mon Oct 09, 2006 6:27 pm
Location: Middle Tennessee

Post by Scoutdad »

8 versus 8 is gonna get messy anyway.
I just hope I make t to the final round so I don't have to moderate it!
:lol:
Commander, Battlegroup Murfreesboro
Department Head, ACTASF
mojo jojo
Lieutenant Commander
Posts: 340
Joined: Tue Jun 23, 2009 3:09 pm

Post by mojo jojo »

I know someone who's willing to be an alternate if someone drops out.
User avatar
Scoutdad
Commodore
Posts: 4751
Joined: Mon Oct 09, 2006 6:27 pm
Location: Middle Tennessee

Post by Scoutdad »

Since we've not heard from fathertaylor, we are going with Killerjoe1968 as player #1 in game FC0009.

this game will be killerjoe1968 flying a Hydran Mongol plus 5 Stingers
versus
alex knight flying a WYn War Cruiser with Phaser-1s in both option mounts
Commander, Battlegroup Murfreesboro
Department Head, ACTASF
Rick Smith
Lieutenant Commander
Posts: 261
Joined: Tue Sep 02, 2008 3:56 am

Post by Rick Smith »

Welcome to the fun, Killerjoe!
User avatar
Scoutdad
Commodore
Posts: 4751
Joined: Mon Oct 09, 2006 6:27 pm
Location: Middle Tennessee

Post by Scoutdad »

Just a brief update:

After the holiday delay, all 8 games seem to be running again (some faster than others).
Three of the games are still in the Turn 1, Impulse 1.4 stage; while the other 5 are somewhere between Impulse 5 and 8.
I don't think any of them have quite reached Turn 2 yet, although one had... til one of the players pointed out that I missed an obvious BREAK condition on Turn 1.6.2 ( :oops: ) and we had to reset to that point and go again.

I (and hopefully the other two moderators) will make an effort to post updates so everyone can see the current status of all the games. That way, everyone can be a part of the fun!

Next question, with the relative nearness of the starting positions - some of the round one games will end rather quickly. This leads to round two:

How do we do round two? We have two choices...
1) We wait until all eight games are finished and then determine the match-ups completely randomly.
or...
2) We match up the winners ofhte 1st and 2nd games completed, then the 3rd and 4th games, followed by 5th/6th and 7th/8th.

Option one is truly random but option two keeps everyone playing.
What's your pleasure???
Commander, Battlegroup Murfreesboro
Department Head, ACTASF
Post Reply