Rule proposal: firing at impacted seekers

Discuss general information about the Federation Commander gaming system here.

Moderators: mjwest, Albiegamer

Post Reply
User avatar
Mike
Fleet Captain
Posts: 1674
Joined: Mon May 07, 2007 10:58 pm
Location: South Carolina

Rule proposal: firing at impacted seekers

Post by Mike »

I would like to propose a rule change, specifically, phasers used in the defensive fire phase to fire at impacted seeking weapons would fire at range=0 instead of range=1 as the rule now reads.

No range could possibly be closer than an impacted seeking weapon's range, yet ships in the same hex are at range=0.
Mike

=====
Sandpaper gets the job done, but makes for a lot of friction.
User avatar
marcus_aurelius
Lieutenant Commander
Posts: 254
Joined: Sat Jun 07, 2008 1:55 am
Location: Cary IL

Post by marcus_aurelius »

My understanding is that firing at impacted seekers once for the entire FC impluse (1/8 turn) is a simplification of SFB where you can fire every SFB impulse (1 /32 turn).

If I remember correctly (it has been many years) in SFB the closest range at which you can fire at a seeking weapon is at range 1. If the weapon gets to range zero in SFB then it impacts and there is no chance to fire.

So, changing the defensive fire range to zero in FC would break the symmetry with SFB and actually make defensive fire in FC to be better than SFB.
User avatar
mjwest
Commodore
Posts: 4103
Joined: Sun Oct 08, 2006 4:30 pm
Location: Dallas, Texas
Contact:

Post by mjwest »

marcus got it, for the most part.

Using the range 1 chart for defensive fire was an intentional design decision. Steve felt that using the range 0 chart would end up being too efficient.
Image
Federation Commander Answer Guy
User avatar
Kang
Fleet Captain
Posts: 1976
Joined: Sun Sep 23, 2007 12:13 pm
Location: Devon, UK
Contact:

Post by Kang »

Plus it's been said elsewhere that the Range 1 stipulation simulates firing at the seeking weapon 'all the way in'.
Image
storeylf
Fleet Captain
Posts: 1887
Joined: Thu Jul 24, 2008 9:11 pm

Post by storeylf »

Aye - I don't think seekers are that overpowering anyway. Defensive fire is already fairly efficient.

The ADD change coming in will also hugely alter drone balance amongst the drone using races (to much in my gut feeling). I'd not do anything else to do with defensive fire for quite a while until more people play with the ADD rules.
User avatar
Steve Cole
Site Admin
Posts: 3846
Joined: Wed Oct 11, 2006 5:24 pm

Post by Steve Cole »

Intentional design decision. Not going to change.
The Guy Who Designed Fed Commander
Image
Post Reply