First photos of painted ship posted.

Renderings, minis, and news about this product line

Moderators: mjwest, Albiegamer

User avatar
Scoutdad
Commodore
Posts: 4751
Joined: Mon Oct 09, 2006 6:27 pm
Location: Middle Tennessee

First photos of painted ship posted.

Post by Scoutdad »

Steve has posted the first images of a painted Mongoose Starline 2500 miniature on the SFUDB.

You can see them HERE!.
They are near the bottom of the page.
Commander, Battlegroup Murfreesboro
Department Head, ACTASF
User avatar
Darkwing
Lieutenant Commander
Posts: 249
Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2010 5:14 pm
Location: ZZ 9 plural Z A

Post by Darkwing »

Looks great! I can't wait to get my hands on a couple of those!
Let's get DANGEROUS!

Tice Leonard, U.S.S. Lexington & IKV Annihilation
User avatar
djdood
Commodore
Posts: 3407
Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2007 5:41 am
Location: Seattle, WA
Contact:

Post by djdood »

Good job, Tony!!

Nice decals :wink:
ImageImage
User avatar
Burning Chrome
Lieutenant SG
Posts: 118
Joined: Fri Feb 04, 2011 10:20 pm
Location: Michigan

Post by Burning Chrome »

Nice.

Is it just me or is something "off" a bit?

Nacels too far apart or too thin?
Suppose you were an idiot. And suppose you were a member of Congress. But then I repeat myself.-- Mark Twain
User avatar
Scoutdad
Commodore
Posts: 4751
Joined: Mon Oct 09, 2006 6:27 pm
Location: Middle Tennessee

Post by Scoutdad »

The nacelles splayed out a bit.
I was under a rushed deadline to get it painted, so I epoxied it together - let it dry a bit - then turned it upside down to paint the underneath.

Once everything was painted underneath and I flipped it over, I saw thatthe nacelles had splayed a bit from the weight of the mini on the uncured epoxy. :(

I'll let me next one cure completely before inverting it.
Commander, Battlegroup Murfreesboro
Department Head, ACTASF
User avatar
Scoutdad
Commodore
Posts: 4751
Joined: Mon Oct 09, 2006 6:27 pm
Location: Middle Tennessee

Post by Scoutdad »

A few more photos posted to my photobucket site. The link is in the sig below.
Commander, Battlegroup Murfreesboro
Department Head, ACTASF
User avatar
Thenur
Ensign
Posts: 13
Joined: Fri May 20, 2011 5:18 am

Post by Thenur »

Looks great you did a great job on it. I can't wait to get my hands on some.
"Wherever you have an efficient government you have a dictatorship."
User avatar
Starfury
Lieutenant Commander
Posts: 302
Joined: Fri Nov 03, 2006 9:10 pm

Post by Starfury »

Scoutdad wrote:The nacelles splayed out a bit.
I was under a rushed deadline to get it painted, so I epoxied it together - let it dry a bit - then turned it upside down to paint the underneath.

Once everything was painted underneath and I flipped it over, I saw thatthe nacelles had splayed a bit from the weight of the mini on the uncured epoxy. :(

I'll let me next one cure completely before inverting it.
When using epoxy I'll do that on the inside of the item (5 min expoxy) but will put superglue on the outer part to hold it in place. Worked good so far...have some dragons from the 90's that haven't fallen apart.
User avatar
djdood
Commodore
Posts: 3407
Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2007 5:41 am
Location: Seattle, WA
Contact:

Post by djdood »

My understanding is that Tony is a fan of the "two glue" method too.

I think he was just in a really big schedule-crunch to get this one done and had other things competing for his time. It still turned out really well and looks like the "tv ship" enough to get some folks talking.

Lords knows I've botched my fair share by getting called away to answer the door, a sudden gust of wind, an overly excitable dog, etc., etc...
ImageImage
User avatar
Scoutdad
Commodore
Posts: 4751
Joined: Mon Oct 09, 2006 6:27 pm
Location: Middle Tennessee

Post by Scoutdad »

Yep. I do typically do the "two-glue" method.
Several things conspired against me in this instance...
Lack of still liquid CA adhesive (oops) :oops:
Lack of time (SVC really needed the photos in time for HF)
and a plain old desire to put some paint on the mini itself.
Commander, Battlegroup Murfreesboro
Department Head, ACTASF
User avatar
OGOPTIMUS
Captain
Posts: 979
Joined: Fri Nov 10, 2006 5:38 am
Contact:

Post by OGOPTIMUS »

Very nicley done Tony. I'm jealous that you got to be the tester guy.

I really hope that it's a glue reason that the nacelles are so far apart.
User avatar
Scoutdad
Commodore
Posts: 4751
Joined: Mon Oct 09, 2006 6:27 pm
Location: Middle Tennessee

Post by Scoutdad »

OGOPTIMUS wrote:Very nicley done Tony. I'm jealous that you got to be the tester guy.

I really hope that it's a glue reason that the nacelles are so far apart.
Paul,
That is most defnitely the reason. I dry fit everything after sanding the flash off (and it held together quite nicely. ALl the pieces fit very well) and verified the angles.
During the dry-fit stage, the nacelles were indeed much closer together and raised above the saucer just a bit more.
Commander, Battlegroup Murfreesboro
Department Head, ACTASF
User avatar
djdood
Commodore
Posts: 3407
Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2007 5:41 am
Location: Seattle, WA
Contact:

Post by djdood »

Actually, when I overlaid the orthographic views of the Mongoose computer model with the various blueprints for the "tv ship", the Mongoose model does put the engines a little higher and further apart than tradition. It's a change, but one only uber-geeks like me would notice.

Image
ImageImage
User avatar
Bolo_MK_XL
Captain
Posts: 835
Joined: Tue Jan 16, 2007 10:00 pm
Location: North Carolina

Post by Bolo_MK_XL »

Looks like their mounted to the pylon at a different spot on the engine --
Which uses a shorter pylon --
User avatar
djdood
Commodore
Posts: 3407
Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2007 5:41 am
Location: Seattle, WA
Contact:

Post by djdood »

Could be for production reason, could be style, doesn't really harm anything either way.
ImageImage
Post Reply