Klingon E4

Post by **Jean** » Tue Sep 13, 2011 11:10 pm

Klingon E4. SVC wrote: Sandrine's E4. We're not sure yet about the size compared to the D7. I should note that she fixed the rear phaser arc but only one of these views is of the one with this fix.

top

side

above rear

back

above front

underneath

The last two are the old and new (lower rear phaser) front views.

old

new

Enjoy!

phdillman · Post by **phdillman** » Wed Sep 14, 2011 2:46 pm

Overall, I'm happy with that.

Now to work on getting some Kestrel's painted on that.

Darkwing · Post by **Darkwing** » Wed Sep 14, 2011 3:47 pm

Overall, a great looking ship.

Ravenhull · Post by **Ravenhull** » Thu Sep 15, 2011 11:46 am

phdillman wrote:Overall, I'm happy with that.

Now to work on getting some Kestrel's painted on that.

Actually, that might be a good argument to keep details on the bottom of the Klingon ships minimal to allow for ease in Romming them up.

djdood · Post by **djdood** » Thu Sep 15, 2011 7:55 pm

I put my main post up on the bbs. [short-version: I asked for the "head" shape, window patterns, and deckhouse sizing to be changed], to help make the E-4 work for full-height Klingons.
(Nobody wants to crew their E-4s with just Bargantines and Dunkar dwarves, who would be the only ones who could fit int he boom).

Here's the image I shared, for the benefit of those here:

djdood · Post by **djdood** » Thu Sep 15, 2011 8:43 pm

Some ideas for different boom shapes for the E-4.

Burning Chrome · Post by **Burning Chrome** » Thu Sep 15, 2011 9:49 pm

I cannot tell you how much I appreciate this attention to detail and scale.

Post by **Steve Cole** » Fri Sep 16, 2011 5:52 pm

Will, it's cool to show the guys that, but if you want mongoose to see it you need to email me a copy.

djdood · Post by **djdood** » Fri Sep 16, 2011 8:06 pm

That was too rough to share. I sent you a refined computer graphics drawing via email, early this morning.

djdood · Post by **djdood** » Fri Sep 16, 2011 10:46 pm

Updated (and finalized) proposal for E-4 (already emailed to SVC):

Burning Chrome · Post by **Burning Chrome** » Sat Sep 17, 2011 4:05 am

Spot on.

leathernsteel · Post by **leathernsteel** » Sat Sep 17, 2011 5:56 am

djdood, I have really enjoyed seeing your diagrams!!! Thank you for posting these for use to see! That is some fine work to be sure!

P.S. Now do what SVC said!

djdood · Post by **djdood** » Sat Sep 17, 2011 7:31 am

leathernsteel wrote:P.S. Now do what SVC said!

Do what? I mention in the first line that it was already emailed to SVC, before I posted it here. Did I miss something?

Regardless, I'm glad folks like seeing these.

leathernsteel · Post by **leathernsteel** » Sat Sep 17, 2011 6:58 pm

moot point then.

djdood · Post by **djdood** » Sat Sep 17, 2011 9:36 pm

Cool. I'm hoping the suggestions have some impact on the final ship. If not, it will still be neat, but I'm viewing this as the once-in-a-lifetime chance to adjust some of the ships.