I started by comparing the Starline 2400 D6 and D6M miniatures, as well as comparing the SSDs.
The SSD shows that the D6M was created by removing several of the components present in teh rear hull of the D6 and replacign them with three battery packs. The disruptors in the nacelles were also replaced with smaller battery packs and a Mauler cannon firing port.
The original sculptor of the D6M chose to model these battery packs on the upper surface of the mini. One on each wing and on on top of the deckhouse, as shown in the image below. Cables were then ran from one pack to the next and then to the firing port.
For the Starline 2500, I intend something very similar.
My original thought was to put the batteries below the wings as this would prevent any blockage of the phasers on top of the wings. But if I'm doing this, why not say all the workings are inside the hull and just call the mini a D6M?
Instead, I intend to place the two wing mounted batery packs farther back and lower doen the wing surface. This will still give the D6M the visual distinctiveness it requires, but will not block the L/LR and R/RR firing arcs of the phaser-2s.
The third battey pack will have to be mounted underneath the hull since the Starline 2500 deckhouse has more detail than I care to cover up.
The disruptor bands on both engines will be filed away and holes drilled to accept a length of 1/16" brass tubing for the firing port. My first intention isto use old guitar strings for the power transfer conduits (we'll see how that works out). I will also mold the battery packs from a 2-part epoxy putty (or green stuff).
Here's the image:

The mini is on the workbench awaiting prepping.
So let's be about it!





