Fleet composition

Discuss general information about the Federation Commander gaming system here.

Moderators: mjwest, Albiegamer

User avatar
Spacecowboy87
Lieutenant Commander
Posts: 205
Joined: Tue Jan 03, 2012 2:01 am
Location: Colorado

Fleet composition

Post by Spacecowboy87 »

Putting fleets together is fun if you like a lot of math and a bunch of silly (I mean important) restrictions (cough cough Tholians :roll: ) But I do have a few questions:
1) Should a Romulan fleet try to be of the same type (old, new, Klingon) or was blending common?
2) Similarly, should a Hydran fleet have a blend of types? There are just as many variables here too -- fusion or hellbore, stingers or no stingers. And on that topic, is it common to give a ship less than its full complement of stingers for sake of points balance?
3) What is the largest fleet the Wyn would put together-- either by points or number of ships?
Thanks in advance.
Damn, these dice are cold!
User avatar
Steve Cole
Site Admin
Posts: 3846
Joined: Wed Oct 11, 2006 5:24 pm

Post by Steve Cole »

1) Should a Romulan fleet try to be of the same type (old, new, Klingon) or was blending common?

The old and new types used the same logistics network, no problem with blending. The KRs used a unique spare parts system and they tried to keep them more or less against the Feds but sometimes had to use them agains the Gorns.

2) Similarly, should a Hydran fleet have a blend of types? There are just as many variables here too -- fusion or hellbore, stingers or no stingers. And on that topic, is it common to give a ship less than its full complement of stingers for sake of points balance?

Hydrans always blended both types.

3) What is the largest fleet the Wyn would put together-- either by points or number of ships?

FC doesn't bother itself with picky matters of how many ships actually existed.
The Guy Who Designed Fed Commander
Image
User avatar
Spacecowboy87
Lieutenant Commander
Posts: 205
Joined: Tue Jan 03, 2012 2:01 am
Location: Colorado

Post by Spacecowboy87 »

I know that a lot of picky matters are overlooked in FC (which I kinda dig), but we don't want to go completely nuts and have the Gorns put down a Hydran invasion :) consisting of 20 D7Hs :lol:
But if FC wants to give players free rein, why bother mentioning the restrictions on Neo-Tholians? I mean, who wouldn't want to mow down a bunch of Klingons with a squadron of 3 NCAs? But if it wouldn't happen in "reality," then maybe it shouldn't be encouraged in FC? I'm sure there are players who fill every Orion option mount with a phaser G, despite it being "illegal" in game terms.
I guess I'm trying to find a balance between the historical unfolding of the SFU, and what might be fun to try.
Damn, these dice are cold!
User avatar
djdood
Commodore
Posts: 3407
Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2007 5:41 am
Location: Seattle, WA
Contact:

Post by djdood »

Sometimes the restrictions are for gameplay reasons. Too many web-casters (or PPDs) can unbalance things.
ImageImage
User avatar
mjwest
Commodore
Posts: 4103
Joined: Sun Oct 08, 2006 4:30 pm
Location: Dallas, Texas
Contact:

Post by mjwest »

djdood wrote:Sometimes the restrictions are for gameplay reasons. Too many web-casters (or PPDs) can unbalance things.
This is the exact issue. Some things that were limited in SFB just to keep a lid on things (e.g. fleet size limits) were not included in Federation Commander. But things that were pure play-balance (e.g. PPD limit) were included in Federation Commander. So that is why Federation Commander doesn't care how many ships the WYN brings to a battle, but does care about the weapon mix of those WYN ships.
Image
Federation Commander Answer Guy
User avatar
Nerroth
Fleet Captain
Posts: 1722
Joined: Sun Oct 08, 2006 9:46 am
Location: Ontario, Canada

Post by Nerroth »

If you wanted to, you could try and see what kind of effect a Tholian Will fleet would have had in the Milky Way, by using the home galaxy restrictions in (8B4) (use particle cannons instead of disruptors, etc) and assembling a fleet of Neos (with no "new" Holdfast units).

However, if anything, it would likely act as a demonstration of one key historical point; the web caster, used in such numbers as available to a full Neo-Tholian fleet, was a galaxy-conquering advantage that only the advent of the web breaker could undo.

(Unless you are hiding in a nebula, in which case the non-web-fist applications don't work; a key reason why the semi-isolated Nebuline colonies supporting the various High Pirate Bands in the M81 Galaxy remained in existence during the long centuries of Tholian rule.)
User avatar
paulgenna
Lieutenant SG
Posts: 109
Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2011 8:46 pm

PPD's

Post by paulgenna »

Everyone picks on the PPD's. I sure wish I could have more than 10 in a battle. :D
User avatar
Steve Cole
Site Admin
Posts: 3846
Joined: Wed Oct 11, 2006 5:24 pm

Post by Steve Cole »

The reason you want more than 10 is the reason we can't let it happen.
The Guy Who Designed Fed Commander
Image
storeylf
Fleet Captain
Posts: 1887
Joined: Thu Jul 24, 2008 9:11 pm

Re: PPD's

Post by storeylf »

paulgenna wrote:Everyone picks on the PPD's. I sure wish I could have more than 10 in a battle. :D
Just take more than 10 ships. :P
User avatar
Steve Cole
Site Admin
Posts: 3846
Joined: Wed Oct 11, 2006 5:24 pm

Post by Steve Cole »

won't help, the rules limit the number of ISC PPDs in one fleet.
The Guy Who Designed Fed Commander
Image
storeylf
Fleet Captain
Posts: 1887
Joined: Thu Jul 24, 2008 9:11 pm

Post by storeylf »

It limits it to the number of ships in the ISC fleet. There is no limit to fleet size in FedCom.

There fore if you want more than 10 PPDs you just have to take more than 10 ships. e.g. 11 ships means you can have 11 PPDs.

Alternatively, as the rules limit ISC fleets only, you could take 3 Orion DNs + 1 BCH for 11 PPDs on 4 ships (they can each have 3 and 2 PPDs respectively).
Last edited by storeylf on Sun Nov 04, 2012 9:44 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
jeffery smith
Lieutenant SG
Posts: 190
Joined: Wed Oct 11, 2006 5:34 pm
Location: Bothell,WA

Post by jeffery smith »

I was not aware of a published configuration for the Orion option mounts that would allow this.
fun fun fun in the sun sun sun
User avatar
jeffery smith
Lieutenant SG
Posts: 190
Joined: Wed Oct 11, 2006 5:34 pm
Location: Bothell,WA

Post by jeffery smith »

story elf:

PPD requires 2 adjacent option mounts.

That means the 3xDN and the battlecruiser can only carry 1 each per the option mounts list in 5L.

(5L1) if ESG or Plasma S is selected, another of the forward mounts must remain empty. Orions can use PPD's in combinations able to hold a plasma S.

So for the BC/BCH if you put a PPD in mount A, mount B has to remain empty.

On the DN if you put a PPD in mount A, mount B has to remain empty but you could mount a single space weapon into mount C (but there is not enough room for a 2nd ESG,Plasma S, or PPD).
fun fun fun in the sun sun sun
User avatar
Dal Downing
Commander
Posts: 665
Joined: Tue May 06, 2008 1:43 pm
Location: Western Wisconsin

Post by Dal Downing »

Jeffrey Smith - are you looking at Fleet Scale or Squadron Scale ships? The Orion DN has a total of six Center Line option mounts in Squadron Scale. ABC have the double cross symbol but DEF are still Center Line mounts that can be left open. Which means Lee's count of 3 is right in Squadron Scale but, I have a feeling this loop hole is going to get closed real quick.
Last edited by Dal Downing on Wed Oct 31, 2012 9:44 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-Dal

"Which one of you is the Biggest, Baddest, Bootlicker of the bunch?"
"I am."
"ARCHERS!!! THAT ONE!!!!"
storeylf
Fleet Captain
Posts: 1887
Joined: Thu Jul 24, 2008 9:11 pm

Post by storeylf »

Plasma S doesn't require 'adjacent mounts' technically, they require another forward mount. The DN has 6 forward mounts. Ergo it can hold 3 plasma S. Indeed 5L shows that A,B,C can all have plasma S - because D,E and F then become the 2nd boxes that are sacrificed.

If you look at the Heavy cruiser with only 2 mounts up front it can have a Plasma S in A. Option B doesn't list a plasma S as that is the extra mount you give up (it could have said B can have the plasma and you also give up A, but that is the same effect).


PS Whilst I expect it is a loop hole that may be closed, I am not sure it is really that bad. The Orion DN will cost you 328 points and the BCH 210, so that is 1194 for 4 ships that are not really that great (the orion DN is pretty weak for its points).

For 1194 points you get 11 PPDs, 30 Ph1s, 8 drones and 30 Ph3s

The cheap ISC version is 5 FF, 5 CS and 1 CA which is only 106 points more.

The ISC get 11 PPDs, 58 Ph1s, 24 Plasma F, 2 Plasma S and 46 Ph3s. Not mention a whole lot more boxes and shields to kill.

The PPD limit fits the ISC fluff more, but not the orions. Given that orions can't really break the limit without being very much a 1 trick pony I don't see a huge problem.
Post Reply