Damage to Planets

Ask your questions about Federation Commander game system rules here.

Moderators: mjwest, Albiegamer

jpm
Ensign
Posts: 7
Joined: Wed Nov 21, 2012 6:34 pm

Damage to Planets

Post by jpm »

I was looking for a rule about damage to planets in FC? Are there any and how much damage can a Class M planet take? Do the different weapons inflict different damages? I have FC Klingon Border with rev 4 of the rule book.
User avatar
m1a1dat
Lieutenant JG
Posts: 99
Joined: Wed Dec 17, 2008 7:26 am
Location: 91320

Post by m1a1dat »

I feel safe in saying that you can not do a Death Star and blow up an entire planet. You can, however, devastate the surface and bomb them back to the stone age. There are some scenarios out there where this is the objective. I don't have any books with me right now, so i can't say any specifics (and they probably vary by scenario) but usually you have to do several hundred or more damage to a hexside to devastate it. In some cases you actually have to roll "to hit" the planet. Yes a planet takes up the whole hex and how can that photon torpedo possibly miss, but if it is a sparsely populated planet then that photon doesn't have much affect if it hits a a few thousand Km away from any population center. The different weapons would all have the same affect and just do their damage points to the planet.
User avatar
mjwest
Commodore
Posts: 4103
Joined: Sun Oct 08, 2006 4:30 pm
Location: Dallas, Texas
Contact:

Post by mjwest »

You can't "kill" a planet (or a moon, or even a large asteroid). All you can do is cause damage to its surface. If it matters to the scenario, the scenario will list the amount of damage you need to cause to the planet's surface to fulfill the victory conditions. But you cannot blow up a planet, nor can you "sterilize" it. A planet is just too big and there is just too much stuff on the planet for a ship (or even an entire fleet) to have that big of an effect.
Image
Federation Commander Answer Guy
User avatar
Dal Downing
Commander
Posts: 665
Joined: Tue May 06, 2008 1:43 pm
Location: Western Wisconsin

Post by Dal Downing »

Physically destroying a planet is outside of the rules. In Federation and Empire you can Deviastate a planet which is basically is doing your best to bomb it to a point that make a catagory 5 tornado or hurricane looks tame.

The Feds even managed to drop a Heavy Carrier aka Heavy Dreadnaught on Remus ticking off the Romulans for a couple of decides. The MacArthur despite killing millions of people when her reactors went off did not destroy the planet. The ecological and economic consequences were catastrophic but the planet did survive.
-Dal

"Which one of you is the Biggest, Baddest, Bootlicker of the bunch?"
"I am."
"ARCHERS!!! THAT ONE!!!!"
User avatar
Mike
Fleet Captain
Posts: 1674
Joined: Mon May 07, 2007 10:58 pm
Location: South Carolina

Post by Mike »

It does depend on the scenario, but all of them I've seen where planet damage is a factor say something like 200 points of damage for each hexside of a planet is enough to devastate its surface.
Mike

=====
Sandpaper gets the job done, but makes for a lot of friction.
User avatar
Kang
Fleet Captain
Posts: 1976
Joined: Sun Sep 23, 2007 12:13 pm
Location: Devon, UK
Contact:

Post by Kang »

I don't know why, in a military scenario, it would ever make sense to destroy a planet a la Death Star, except perhaps for the reason they did that to Alderaan in the film. Alternatively, to blow up a planet which is only important because of the base on it - like the Yavin IV moon base in Star Wars A New Hope - but in a single shot, to a) save time and effort and b) as an example. A terror weapon, if you will. But apart from that....

In the SFU, military struggles are about possessions - cargo, resources, an area of space, a planet, a system, a station, a ship, some scientific information, whatever. You fight so that you have the thing the other guy wants and therefore he doesn't have it.

In our games, planets are often the 'real estate' that is being fought over. In most cases, the idea is to either possess the planet - for which you would also need to control the space around it - or you want to do something on/to the surface: destroy a base or other enemy presence; or rescue your own people/ship/relic/dilithium crystals or whatever.

In none of these cases does completely destroying the planet make sense; in the SFU it would be waste of energy, and therefore a waste of fuel, and in the end money. There's just no need.

That said, if ever we do get an empire in the SFU that holds to the same principles as the Galactic Empire from that galaxy a long time ago and far, far away, we might need that sort of weapon. Even if just to set an example.....
Image
User avatar
Wolverin61
Commander
Posts: 495
Joined: Sun Nov 16, 2008 2:07 am
Location: Mississippi
Contact:

Post by Wolverin61 »

But what about when you need to change the trajectory of the Nexus?
"His pattern indicates two-dimensional thinking."
Image
User avatar
Kang
Fleet Captain
Posts: 1976
Joined: Sun Sep 23, 2007 12:13 pm
Location: Devon, UK
Contact:

Post by Kang »

Then a Death Star is exactly what you need. Good catch, Andy :)
Image
User avatar
trynda1701
Lieutenant SG
Posts: 147
Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2008 11:44 pm
Location: BR "Swanmay"

Post by trynda1701 »

Pfff, in the SFU, we don't need no Death Star...we've got the Black Hole Gun!!! :shock: :wink:
C'mon the Orions!

Check out www.AllScaleTrek.com. A new forum dedicated to Star Trek kits, miniatures and collectables.
User avatar
Wolverin61
Commander
Posts: 495
Joined: Sun Nov 16, 2008 2:07 am
Location: Mississippi
Contact:

Post by Wolverin61 »

Kang wrote:Then a Death Star is exactly what you need. Good catch, Andy :)
Does it have Aegis, Tony?
"His pattern indicates two-dimensional thinking."
Image
User avatar
Kang
Fleet Captain
Posts: 1976
Joined: Sun Sep 23, 2007 12:13 pm
Location: Devon, UK
Contact:

Post by Kang »

Ha :) (Everyone else: Private joke, there....)
Image
User avatar
Targ
Lieutenant SG
Posts: 125
Joined: Thu Nov 02, 2006 2:04 am
Location: York U.K.

Post by Targ »

i want mud it builds ships :twisted:
User avatar
PallidaMors
Commander
Posts: 478
Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2007 4:54 am
Location: Seattle, Wa

Post by PallidaMors »

I thought the DOOMS DAY machine was star treks answer for the Death Star.
the Planet killer should get an optional rule for planet destruction, I remember Commodore Decker indicating that the thing was hover over the planet carving out chunks with a beam of pure anti protons.

LOL
Creator Empire campaign rules and Code of War (COW)Expansion.
review rules on the Federation Commander Campaign post, 123,000 views and growing
archon96
Lieutenant JG
Posts: 65
Joined: Sat Aug 20, 2011 7:39 pm

Post by archon96 »

just remember that the episode with the doomsday weapon air years before star wars.
User avatar
PallidaMors
Commander
Posts: 478
Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2007 4:54 am
Location: Seattle, Wa

Post by PallidaMors »

oh I do, I actually saw that episode while I was a kid and Startrek was in it's second season.
Creator Empire campaign rules and Code of War (COW)Expansion.
review rules on the Federation Commander Campaign post, 123,000 views and growing
Post Reply