Carriers

Discuss general information about the Federation Commander gaming system here.

Moderators: mjwest, Albiegamer

User avatar
jeffery smith
Lieutenant SG
Posts: 190
Joined: Wed Oct 11, 2006 5:34 pm
Location: Bothell,WA

Post by jeffery smith »

well not to get my head lobbed off but fighters were not a TOS thing (ducks quickly).

If the smallest carrier is going to carry 12 fighters in squadscale then the flight size could be 6 (which would then be 3 in fleetscale). or you could have 4 flights of 3(ss)/ 2 flights of 3(fs). personelly i prefer flights of 4 fighters each which could be the Squadscale with flights of 2 fighters each in Fleetscale.

Mjwest: it might be easier to ponder this question if we had a prototype flight shipcard to test.
fun fun fun in the sun sun sun
User avatar
DNordeen
Commander
Posts: 545
Joined: Thu Apr 05, 2007 1:58 am

Post by DNordeen »

fighters were not a TOS thing
Neither were Lyrans, Selts, Hydrans...well you get the point.

Technically, there is a prototype. It's the hydran fighters on the back of one of the reference cards.
Speed is life; Patience is victory

Image
User avatar
Dal Downing
Commander
Posts: 665
Joined: Tue May 06, 2008 1:43 pm
Location: Western Wisconsin

Post by Dal Downing »

jeffery smith wrote:well not to get my head lobbed off but fighters were not a TOS thing (ducks quickly).

If the smallest carrier is going to carry 12 fighters in squadscale then the flight size could be 6 (which would then be 3 in fleetscale). or you could have 4 flights of 3(ss)/ 2 flights of 3(fs). personelly i prefer flights of 4 fighters each which could be the Squadscale with flights of 2 fighters each in Fleetscale.

Mjwest: it might be easier to ponder this question if we had a prototype flight shipcard to test.

Actually the smallest carrier wing is 4 where as most Escort (Frigate) Carriers carry 6. Mobile (War Destroyers) Carriers carry 8, Strike (Cruiser both CAs an CWs) Carriers usually have 12. And of course there are exceptions to these as well, the Kzinti CVL for exsmple have 9 I believe and we the Sparrowhawk based ones are just odd
-Dal

"Which one of you is the Biggest, Baddest, Bootlicker of the bunch?"
"I am."
"ARCHERS!!! THAT ONE!!!!"
User avatar
DNordeen
Commander
Posts: 545
Joined: Thu Apr 05, 2007 1:58 am

Post by DNordeen »

I vaguely remember one of the Rom old series carried 3. It was deployed in pairs to have 6 total. Was it the snipe hull?
Speed is life; Patience is victory

Image
User avatar
terryoc
Captain
Posts: 1384
Joined: Sat Oct 07, 2006 12:46 am

Post by terryoc »

DNordeen, IIRC that was based on the Battlehawk destroyer, not the Snipe. I may be misremembering though.
"Captain" Terry O'Carroll, fourteen papers published including six best of issue
"Man, Terry, you are like a loophole seeking missle!" - Mike West
Image
User avatar
Sneaky Scot
Commander
Posts: 484
Joined: Thu Jan 11, 2007 11:28 am
Location: Tintern, Monmouthshire

Post by Sneaky Scot »

There were 2 ships based on the Battle Hawk: the War Hawk was the carrier, and carried 5 fighters, the Chicken Hawk (which I think is the one you're remembering) was a PF tender and carried 3 PFs. Both ships were operated in pairs, 2 War Hawks would give a total of 10 fighters (usually 5 superiority fighters and 5 torpedo fighters) and 2 Chicken Hawks would give a full PF flotilla of 6.
Nothing is quite as persuasive as a disruptor pistol on slow burn and a rotisserie......
User avatar
DNordeen
Commander
Posts: 545
Joined: Thu Apr 05, 2007 1:58 am

Post by DNordeen »

Yeah... I think it was the chickenhawk.
Speed is life; Patience is victory

Image
Magnum357
Lieutenant Commander
Posts: 225
Joined: Sat Dec 09, 2006 10:21 am

Post by Magnum357 »

Yes, I concure. The Romlan ChickenHawk, basically the early attempt by the Romulans to build a PF Tender.
Post Reply