Cruiser types
Moderators: mjwest, Albiegamer
- Spacecowboy87
- Lieutenant Commander
- Posts: 205
- Joined: Tue Jan 03, 2012 2:01 am
- Location: Colorado
Cruiser types
Just doing a little research on the star fleet website -- In more than on place, I see a list of Federation "CA Heavy Cruisers" with a 1700 series, and others with a 1600 series (but not NCAs, which have their own heading). What's the difference? I might need a ship name for a scenario.
Damn, these dice are cold!
Federation heavy cruisers come in four different number ranges:
- 10xx (e.g. Constellation)
- 13xx (e.g. Republic)
- 17xx (e.g. Constitution)
- 16xx (e.g. Agincourt)
The 10xx and 13xx heavy cruisers are very old heavy cruisers built at the very start of the Middle Years. Originally they were supposed to be actual Early Years cruisers that were converted to modern technology, but I think that has gone by the wayside and now they are just the first lines of the "modern" cruisers.
The 17xx heavy cruisers are the main line cruisers of the late Middle Years and General War.
The 16xx heavy cruisers are there because the 17xx number range was pretty much filled up. So, it served several roles: overflow for CAs, and the place for CFs, CSs, and NCAs. From what I can tell, the heavy cruisers with 16xx numbers are actually newer than CAs with 17xx numbers.
- 10xx (e.g. Constellation)
- 13xx (e.g. Republic)
- 17xx (e.g. Constitution)
- 16xx (e.g. Agincourt)
The 10xx and 13xx heavy cruisers are very old heavy cruisers built at the very start of the Middle Years. Originally they were supposed to be actual Early Years cruisers that were converted to modern technology, but I think that has gone by the wayside and now they are just the first lines of the "modern" cruisers.
The 17xx heavy cruisers are the main line cruisers of the late Middle Years and General War.
The 16xx heavy cruisers are there because the 17xx number range was pretty much filled up. So, it served several roles: overflow for CAs, and the place for CFs, CSs, and NCAs. From what I can tell, the heavy cruisers with 16xx numbers are actually newer than CAs with 17xx numbers.

Federation Commander Answer Guy
I was hoping Mike would chime in, because I recalled he had done a great essay on this.
One caveat I would add - the 13xx-series is in two pieces.
The 136x-series are the Great-class oCA heavy cruisers, which were a backup design, in case the new technology of the Constitution-class didn't work out. They were an odd pair of ships, made by enlarging the oCL old light cruiser design and have nothing to do with the "saucer/rear-hull/two-nacelle" design of the the other heavy cruiser classes.
The 137x-series are the old "R" class, as Mike notes.
One other thing to note is that the NCC-numbers are indeed not used sequentially over time in any way. The use jumps around, with numerically lower numbers being used sometimes 100 years after higher numbers.
One caveat I would add - the 13xx-series is in two pieces.
The 136x-series are the Great-class oCA heavy cruisers, which were a backup design, in case the new technology of the Constitution-class didn't work out. They were an odd pair of ships, made by enlarging the oCL old light cruiser design and have nothing to do with the "saucer/rear-hull/two-nacelle" design of the the other heavy cruiser classes.
The 137x-series are the old "R" class, as Mike notes.
One other thing to note is that the NCC-numbers are indeed not used sequentially over time in any way. The use jumps around, with numerically lower numbers being used sometimes 100 years after higher numbers.
- Spacecowboy87
- Lieutenant Commander
- Posts: 205
- Joined: Tue Jan 03, 2012 2:01 am
- Location: Colorado
Here, go check out the Federation Ship Name List. That way you can see all of the names, not just the two OCAs.

Federation Commander Answer Guy
- Dal Downing
- Commander
- Posts: 665
- Joined: Tue May 06, 2008 1:43 pm
- Location: Western Wisconsin
Three were named only 2 were built but, NCC 1364 - 1369 are unused come up with a great name and SVC might add it.Spacecowboy87 wrote:Thanks-- that answers my next question, because I was looking for OCA names. There were only two of them?
-Dal
"Which one of you is the Biggest, Baddest, Bootlicker of the bunch?"
"I am."
"ARCHERS!!! THAT ONE!!!!"
"Which one of you is the Biggest, Baddest, Bootlicker of the bunch?"
"I am."
"ARCHERS!!! THAT ONE!!!!"

