Andromedan Power Absorbers

Ask your questions about Federation Commander game system rules here.

Moderators: mjwest, Albiegamer

Post Reply
User avatar
cnuzzi
Lieutenant Commander
Posts: 207
Joined: Sat Jun 10, 2017 1:25 pm

Andromedan Power Absorbers

Post by cnuzzi »

The rules state:
(3G2b) Burn Through: As with shields, if a given
volley scores ten or more points of damage, one of
these points is not absorbed by the power absorber
bank but is instead distributed by the Damage Alloca-
tion Chart as internal damage. If the volley includes
damage caused by disruptors, then every tenth dam-
age point of the volley
Why are disruptors specifically mentioned here? Isn't that the same thing as what is described above?
User avatar
mjwest
Commodore
Posts: 4103
Joined: Sun Oct 08, 2006 4:30 pm
Location: Dallas, Texas
Contact:

Post by mjwest »

The difference is that if the volley does not contain damage from disruptors, then no matter how large the volley is, if it has at least 10 points, only one point of burn-through is inflicted. But, if the volley does contain damage from disruptors, then there is one point of burn-through for every 10 points of damage.

Example:
Volley of 32 points of damage, none from disruptors, against a 4 panel PA bank: 1 point of burn-through; 31 points of damage absorbed by the PA panels.
Volley of 32 points of damage, including some from disruptors, against a 4 panel PA bank: 3 points of burn-through; 29 points of damage absorbed by the PA panels.
Image
Federation Commander Answer Guy
User avatar
cnuzzi
Lieutenant Commander
Posts: 207
Joined: Sat Jun 10, 2017 1:25 pm

Post by cnuzzi »

Does the same apply to shields?
User avatar
cnuzzi
Lieutenant Commander
Posts: 207
Joined: Sat Jun 10, 2017 1:25 pm

Post by cnuzzi »

Don't worry about it - I just looked it up, I've been doing it wrong, all this time. I was thinking of the old "leaky shields" option in SFB, I guess. Oh well!
User avatar
mjwest
Commodore
Posts: 4103
Joined: Sun Oct 08, 2006 4:30 pm
Location: Dallas, Texas
Contact:

Post by mjwest »

Yeah, that one gets a lot of people.

But, yes, the "disruptor" exception only applies to Power Absorber panels. The base "burn-through" works on both shields and PA panels.
Image
Federation Commander Answer Guy
User avatar
Scoutdad
Commodore
Posts: 4751
Joined: Mon Oct 09, 2006 6:27 pm
Location: Middle Tennessee

Post by Scoutdad »

The disruptor versus PA panel was recommended by the members of BGM during initial play testing of Andromedans in FC.

We found that Photons and Plasmas generated enough damage in a single hit to overload and collapse a PA panel. As did PPDs, fusion, and Hellbores.

Klingon disruptors on the other hand could not. They can fire every turn, but the Andros can dissipate every turn, as well. Without the ability to crush a PA panel, the Klingons (and by extension any other disruptor armed ship) would be unable to stand up to an equal fleet of Andromedans.

This rule is an attempt to equalize the match-ups between those units.
Commander, Battlegroup Murfreesboro
Department Head, ACTASF
User avatar
Steve Cole
Site Admin
Posts: 3846
Joined: Wed Oct 11, 2006 5:24 pm

Post by Steve Cole »

The same rule was in SFB (years earlier) for the same reason.
The Guy Who Designed Fed Commander
Image
Post Reply