Seltorian Fleet list errors

The official lounge for the ACTASF play testers

Moderator: Albiegamer

Post Reply
User avatar
pixelgeek
Lieutenant SG
Posts: 137
Joined: Sun Oct 08, 2006 3:17 am
Location: Calgary, Alberta Canada
Contact:

Seltorian Fleet list errors

Post by pixelgeek »

Draft: 2
Page Number: all
Section: weapon traits
Error: Damage Attenuation X/Y should be Damage Attenuation 1/1

Draft: 2
Page Number: 1
Section: Mountain Clouds-class Mobile Carrier traits
Error: Probe 0 should have a positive value

Draft: 2
Page Number: 1
Section: Mountain Clouds-class Mobile Carrier fluff
Error: Fluff doesn't read vey well. Might need to be rewritten
User avatar
Scoutdad
Commodore
Posts: 4751
Joined: Mon Oct 09, 2006 6:27 pm
Location: Middle Tennessee

Post by Scoutdad »

Added to master revision list and fixed.
Thanks,
TLT
Last edited by Scoutdad on Thu Jul 08, 2021 1:58 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Commander, Battlegroup Murfreesboro
Department Head, ACTASF
User avatar
Scoutdad
Commodore
Posts: 4751
Joined: Mon Oct 09, 2006 6:27 pm
Location: Middle Tennessee

Re: Seltorian Fleet list errors

Post by Scoutdad »

pixelgeek wrote: Draft: 2
Page Number: 1
Section: Mountain Clouds-class Mobile Carrier traits
Error: Probe 0 should have a positive value
The SSD from Module R6 for the Seltorian DDV DOES NOT indicate a probe.
If you have other, differing information - please provide a source so I can confirm with ADB which version is the correct one.
pixelgeek wrote:Draft: 2
Page Number: 1
Section: Mountain Clouds-class Mobile Carrier fluff
Error: Fluff doesn't read vey well. Might need to be rewritten
This was the original fluff provided by ADB for the DDV in Module R6. As with all other ACTASF units, the text is almost completely copied directly from the original source material with as little modification as is required - and then, usually only where the streamlined rules for ACTASF require an edit of the units capabilities.
Commander, Battlegroup Murfreesboro
Department Head, ACTASF
User avatar
pixelgeek
Lieutenant SG
Posts: 137
Joined: Sun Oct 08, 2006 3:17 am
Location: Calgary, Alberta Canada
Contact:

Re: Seltorian Fleet list errors

Post by pixelgeek »

Scoutdad wrote:The SSD from Module R6 for the Seltorian DDV DOES NOT indicate a probe.
Misread the source material.
Scoutdad wrote:This was the original fluff provided by ADB for the DDV in Module R6. As with all other ACTASF units, the text is almost completely copied directly from the original source material with as little modification as is required - and then, usually only where the streamlined rules for ACTASF require an edit of the units capabilities.
I'll avoid posting these types of issues in the future :-)
Post Reply