What does a Federation Mauler look like?

View Starship art created by Neale.

Moderators: mjwest, Albiegamer

Vanguard
Lieutenant SG
Posts: 147
Joined: Fri Apr 11, 2008 11:37 pm

What does a Federation Mauler look like?

Post by Vanguard »

Well, title says it all. What does the mauler look like? Thoughts? Opinions? How big is it.. is it glowing, etc?
User avatar
Scoutdad
Commodore
Posts: 4751
Joined: Mon Oct 09, 2006 6:27 pm
Location: Middle Tennessee

Post by Scoutdad »

A few years ago, someone posted a photo of their Federation CAM. I was a kit-bash of the standard Federation heavy cruiser with a few modifications.
It had several battery modules attached to the outer hull as in the Klingon D6M mauler cruiser. These packs were made from two-part epoxy-putty. The cables connecting the battery packs to the mauler cannon looked like guitar strings, cut to length an super glued to the miniature. The mauler cannon itself was a piece of 1/4 brass tubing mounted into a hole bored into the upper surface of the saucer, just below the dome and extending to the front of the saucer.

Not exactly how I would have done it, but a great job none the less.
Commander, Battlegroup Murfreesboro
Department Head, ACTASF
Vanguard
Lieutenant SG
Posts: 147
Joined: Fri Apr 11, 2008 11:37 pm

Post by Vanguard »

Hmm.. so, basically, a 'BFG' construction. Well, not too hard to figure out, I guess, though I'll have to play with the placement some.
Vanguard
Lieutenant SG
Posts: 147
Joined: Fri Apr 11, 2008 11:37 pm

Post by Vanguard »

Kevorkian Class Mauler
From SFB

Image
Last edited by Vanguard on Sun Oct 11, 2009 4:10 pm, edited 3 times in total.
User avatar
Ravenhull
Lieutenant Commander
Posts: 231
Joined: Sun Jan 28, 2007 7:47 pm
Location: Mobile, AL

Post by Ravenhull »

I would almost say reroute the mauler to have it project through the saucer. Maybe have some obvious power linkages along the outside of the neck. The saucer mount would be closer to the SSD.
NOLI UMQUAM VIM TURBARUM STULTORUM DEPRETIARE.

Donovan Willett, USS Alabama
Vanguard
Lieutenant SG
Posts: 147
Joined: Fri Apr 11, 2008 11:37 pm

Post by Vanguard »

I thought about it, but I couldn't figure out a way that didn't look wreck-bashy. Also, the backstory had the Kevorkian as a 'new build' from the remains of CAs. That meant that the basic space-frame had to be a CA to begin with.

I decided to up-scale the familiar torpedo bay considerably and allow the extension to the next to include the power couplings to the system. Since the whole kit-and-kaboodle is now on the pylon, it can work with the SSD either way.

And, while I may be a minority on this , I don't really see a Federation ship having major components - particular power generation and coupling - that exposed. That's just beggin' for trouble.
User avatar
Scoutdad
Commodore
Posts: 4751
Joined: Mon Oct 09, 2006 6:27 pm
Location: Middle Tennessee

Post by Scoutdad »

Ravenhull beat me to it, but the SSD clearly indicates the "business end" of the mauler cannon is on the saucer. I'd probably put it underneath the saucer if I was going to put it there.

Also, the mauler isn't quite "BFG" enough. It's supposed to be a huge port. :shock:
Commander, Battlegroup Murfreesboro
Department Head, ACTASF
User avatar
jmt
Lieutenant Commander
Posts: 394
Joined: Sun Oct 08, 2006 3:22 pm
Location: Plano, TX
Contact:

Post by jmt »

Where can one find the Kevorkian SSD? :?:
User avatar
mjwest
Commodore
Posts: 4103
Joined: Sun Oct 08, 2006 4:30 pm
Location: Dallas, Texas
Contact:

Post by mjwest »

The Federation CA and NCL maulers are found in Module R9.

Personally, I would rather see the mauler go down the middle of the bottom of the saucer, wrapping around the top of the "neck". (Really, think of the "future" Enterprise-D from All Good Things.) Then, there would be massive conduits that run down the "neck" and into the secondary hull. More conduits would run up the nacelle struts. There wouldn't need to be conduits on the saucer or secondary hull, as they are big enough to contain the "plumbing". But the neck and struts are just too skinny.

But that's just me.
Image
Federation Commander Answer Guy
User avatar
Ravenhull
Lieutenant Commander
Posts: 231
Joined: Sun Jan 28, 2007 7:47 pm
Location: Mobile, AL

Post by Ravenhull »

'Course, I've always thought the Fed mauler needed to based on the OCL, myself.
NOLI UMQUAM VIM TURBARUM STULTORUM DEPRETIARE.

Donovan Willett, USS Alabama
User avatar
John Schneder II
Lieutenant SG
Posts: 102
Joined: Sun Jan 28, 2007 6:06 pm
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Contact:

Post by John Schneder II »

Tony,
That was my Fed mauler. I can't seem to find my pic of it on my hard drive. I'll see if I can scrounge it up and post it.
One of the guys that sculpts the minis (Starline 2400) :-)
User avatar
Scoutdad
Commodore
Posts: 4751
Joined: Mon Oct 09, 2006 6:27 pm
Location: Middle Tennessee

Post by Scoutdad »

I thought is was yours also, but I checked you're site and couldn't find it - so I then thought I had been mistaken.
Commander, Battlegroup Murfreesboro
Department Head, ACTASF
User avatar
Zapster
Ensign
Posts: 11
Joined: Wed Mar 05, 2008 7:55 pm

Post by Zapster »

Found it!

It was on my old site, not the newer one....

:: makes note to get off my butt and go over to John's and do an even newer one some evening ::
User avatar
Scoutdad
Commodore
Posts: 4751
Joined: Mon Oct 09, 2006 6:27 pm
Location: Middle Tennessee

Post by Scoutdad »

Yep. That's the one I remember seeing - but I still think the mauler cannon should be slung underneath the saucer... not on top of it.

:)
Commander, Battlegroup Murfreesboro
Department Head, ACTASF
Vanguard
Lieutenant SG
Posts: 147
Joined: Fri Apr 11, 2008 11:37 pm

Post by Vanguard »

Okay, updates...

Mauler cannon now is the length of the saucer, on the underside of it.
Capacitor storage batteries added to saucer top, with markings.
Power coupling system added to saucer bottom.
Emergency flush vents added to secondary hull.

Refresh for new image. :)
Post Reply