Telling the ships apart.

Discuss general information about the Federation Commander gaming system here.

Moderators: mjwest, Albiegamer

Post Reply
User avatar
Inari7
Lieutenant JG
Posts: 33
Joined: Sun Aug 19, 2007 8:13 pm

Telling the ships apart.

Post by Inari7 »

Kind of a noob questions for Fed Com.



I have Klingon border and have a bunch of ships like the Fed, DN, CA BC, ect..
I am thinking of getting some of the expansions they also have a Fed how would tell the difference between the CA’s?
This game system does not seem to use class names.

Why not?

Thanks in advance.
I am board with looking good.

(Iggy Pop)
User avatar
Bolo_MK_XL
Captain
Posts: 835
Joined: Tue Jan 16, 2007 10:00 pm
Location: North Carolina

Post by Bolo_MK_XL »

Due to the ease of play FC was designed for, they used ships at a point when all upgrades had been completed --- Ships of a certain size CA, CL, DN are mostly consolidated into one class of ship, with exceptions (more for Feds than other empires) ---

I assume with class your talking Constitution for CAs and so forth ----
For the Feds you have CA, CC and CAD which designates the different versions, for Battlecruisers BCH, BCJ, Dreadnoughts there is the DN, DNH, DNJ etc --

As for when your playing multiple ships of the same type, you just give them a name you like, write it on top of the card, or the number of the counter --
If your into minis, Fed ships would have identifying numbers on the saucer (of which I'm sure your aware) once painting is complete ---
User avatar
Scoutdad
Commodore
Posts: 4751
Joined: Mon Oct 09, 2006 6:27 pm
Location: Middle Tennessee

Post by Scoutdad »

The counters in FC:KB have numbers in the bottom corner... 1, 2, 3, etc.
When you pick up the boosters that have additional heavy cruiser ship cards, you simply write the counter number on the corresponding ship card.

That way, when those low-down, dirty-rotten, methane-breathing, trashcan-looking Hydrans fire at the nearest Federation CA (counter #2, in this case) you can accurately determine and mark the appropriate damage (just before you return the kindness they showedyou and turn them intoa slowly dispersing cloud of scintillating gases and metallic debris)

Edit: Whoops - must have been typing when Mark was posting.
Commander, Battlegroup Murfreesboro
Department Head, ACTASF
User avatar
Bolo_MK_XL
Captain
Posts: 835
Joined: Tue Jan 16, 2007 10:00 pm
Location: North Carolina

Post by Bolo_MK_XL »

Edit: Whoops - must have been typing when Mark was posting.
A person can never have too much information --

Your much more eloquent than I am :)
User avatar
djdood
Commodore
Posts: 3407
Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2007 5:41 am
Location: Seattle, WA
Contact:

Re: Telling the ships apart.

Post by djdood »

Inari7 wrote: I am thinking of getting some of the expansions they also have a Fed how would tell the difference between the CA’s?
This game system does not seem to use class names.
Just to cover all the bases (I'm not sure any of us is answering the question you were really asking, but we're all giving it a good try) -
Like scoutdad said, the Boosters come with extra copies of ship cards from the associated "Border" or "Attack" product, so if you want additional Fed CA's (for example), then Booster #1 gives you an extra one (along with a Command Cruiser variant and a bunch of smaller ships). Each card does indeed have a blank line at the top to fill in the name of your choice (and a list of official names is provided HERE for ideas).

Class-names mean a lot less in the SFU than in other venues. Due to refits, etc. a Early or Middle-years Constitution-class Heavy Cruiser is a shadow of the ship a General-War-era Command Cruiser is (which would also nominally be a Constitution-class ship, although it's the type of variant that naval historians love to argue about class-naming on).

In every cases though, the cards uniquely identify a type of ship. All the cards in Briefing #2 say "The Middle Years" on them, naming them distinctly from the GW-era cousins in the other game products.

The "Attack" expansions are a different animal. They add a set of different ships to the game than the original "Border" box-sets. The earlier Attack expansions added more ships for the empires in the box-sets, later Attack expansions added completely new empires and their ships (Lyrans, Hydrans, Tholians, etc.)

I hope this helps.
ImageImage
User avatar
dave
Lieutenant JG
Posts: 82
Joined: Tue Jun 26, 2007 1:06 pm
Location: Canton, NY

Post by dave »

There are two ways of telling ships appart.

To distinguish between individual ships of the same (or similar) class, the counters are numbered (and miniatures need to be numbered or painted differently).

To distinguish between different ship Classes or Types each ship's type is marked on the counter and each type has a corresponding ship card.

In most cases each class or type has it'sown miniature as well. Somesuch as the Klingon D6, D7 and D7C use the same mini as the differences are not readilly appearent enough at scale to be worth distinct minis.

It is handy to wite the ship Name or counter ID on the ship card if playing with more than one of a given type.

FC has many fewer varrients with in a given hull type, so thi sis less of an issue than in SFB
User avatar
Inari7
Lieutenant JG
Posts: 33
Joined: Sun Aug 19, 2007 8:13 pm

Post by Inari7 »

Thanks everybody!

I was refering to the ship cards not the counters.

It just seemed to me that there were alot of diffrent CA's and it might be difficult to tell them apart.

............Doug
I am board with looking good.

(Iggy Pop)
User avatar
Scoutdad
Commodore
Posts: 4751
Joined: Mon Oct 09, 2006 6:27 pm
Location: Middle Tennessee

Re: Telling the ships apart.

Post by Scoutdad »

Inari7 orignally wrote: I have Klingon border and have a bunch of ships like the Fed, DN, CA BC, ect..
I am thinking of getting some of the expansions they also have a Fed how would tell the difference between the CA’s?
This game system does not seem to use class names.

Why not?
and then wrote:I was refering to the ship cards not the counters.

It just seemed to me that there were alot of diffrent CA's and it might be difficult to tell them apart.
I think I understand the question now:
Let's start with CAs...
Klingon Border is the only product that contains CAs. No other expansion has a CA ship card.
Other products have Federation Strike Cruisers (CS), Fast Cruisers (CF), New Heavy Cruisers (NCA), etc.... but there is only one type of CA in the game - so no issue telling them apart.
[OK - Briefing #2 does have a Middle Years CA... but it's labeled Middle Years, it's in B&W, and it's not a laminated ship card. Even my mother-in-law wouldn't confuse that one with the one from FC:KB!]
BCs are another story. The BC included in FC:KB is the drone armed BC, FC:KA has the Photon Armed BC, and FC:RB has a ship card for the Plasma-F armed BC. In these instances, the class names are printed on the ship card... i.e., Kirov Class in FC:KB, the New Jersey class in FC:KA, and the Bismark class in FC:RB.
DN's are done the same way.

I hope this clears up the issue a bit and answers the question you were originally asking.
Commander, Battlegroup Murfreesboro
Department Head, ACTASF
User avatar
Kang
Fleet Captain
Posts: 1976
Joined: Sun Sep 23, 2007 12:13 pm
Location: Devon, UK
Contact:

Post by Kang »

While on the subject of Fed BCs, can anyone remember where the BCP is? That's the phaser-boat version, where the drones/plas-F's/photons are replaced by phaser-1's.

I was sure it was in a Communique, but can't find it, and I've checked the Master Ship Charts and it's not there either as far as I can see.
Image
User avatar
Dal Downing
Commander
Posts: 665
Joined: Tue May 06, 2008 1:43 pm
Location: Western Wisconsin

Post by Dal Downing »

Kang wrote:While on the subject of Fed BCs, can anyone remember where the BCP is? That's the phaser-boat version, where the drones/plas-F's/photons are replaced by phaser-1's.

I was sure it was in a Communique, but can't find it, and I've checked the Master Ship Charts and it's not there either as far as I can see.
Last Captian's Log # 38, Kang.
-Dal

"Which one of you is the Biggest, Baddest, Bootlicker of the bunch?"
"I am."
"ARCHERS!!! THAT ONE!!!!"
User avatar
pinecone
Fleet Captain
Posts: 1862
Joined: Sat May 03, 2008 2:09 pm
Location: Earth

Post by pinecone »

BC's of most races are equal to the CA's. Plus, the Firehawk CA was in a sety other than klingon border.
User avatar
Scoutdad
Commodore
Posts: 4751
Joined: Mon Oct 09, 2006 6:27 pm
Location: Middle Tennessee

Post by Scoutdad »

pinecone wrote:BC's of most races are equal to the CA's. Plus, the Firehawk CA was in a sety other than klingon border.
Huh??? :?
Commander, Battlegroup Murfreesboro
Department Head, ACTASF
User avatar
Kang
Fleet Captain
Posts: 1976
Joined: Sun Sep 23, 2007 12:13 pm
Location: Devon, UK
Contact:

Post by Kang »

Dal Downing wrote:Last Captian's Log # 38, Kang.
Thanks Dal :) So close to my own eyes I couldn't see it. Duh.
Image
Post Reply