No problem. I sent out the description text, too.

Good luck with your kids' father. That is never good to hear ...

By Ed Crutchfield (Librarian101) on Saturday, September 12, 2009 - 11:18 am: Edit

Another note from the G3 annex. the Fed FEM is not noted as a scout in the notes column even though it does have a scout sensor.

By Loren Knight (Loren) on Saturday, September 12, 2009 - 12:41 pm: Edit

That's because it a Girl Scout!


Hahahhahhaa...


Sorry, couldn't help it.

By Ken Kazinski (Kjkazinski) on Saturday, October 17, 2009 - 10:32 am: Edit

Orion YLR (YR8.5) - There should be Y2 in the notes section. The ship description states the ship "was obviously built earlier" - Ken Kazinski, 16 Oct 2009.

Orion YLR (YR8.5) - The turn mode should be listed as "A" and not "AA." The SSD shows a turn mode of "A." - Ken Kazinski, 16 Oct 2009.

Orion YLR (YR8.5) - There are 8 boarding parties on the SSD and not the 6 listed. - Ken Kazinski, 16 Oct 2009.

Orion YCR (YR8.4) - There should be Y2 in the notes section. The ship description states the ship "was obviously built earlier" - Ken Kazinski, 16 Oct 2009.

Orion YCR (YR8.4) - The turn mode should be listed as "A" and not "AA." The SSD shows a turn mode of "A." - Ken Kazinski, 16 Oct 2009.

By Ken Kazinski (Kjkazinski) on Saturday, October 17, 2009 - 07:08 pm: Edit

Hydran VOL (YR9.4) - There should be a R note, the ship description states this ship is the same as the Musketeer but with the Warp-2.88 engines. - Ken Kazinski, 17 Oct 2009.

By Ken Kazinski (Kjkazinski) on Saturday, October 17, 2009 - 07:19 pm: Edit

Hydran GRN (YR9.5) - There should be a R note, the ship description states this ship has the same upgrages as the Musketeer. - Ken Kazinski, 17 Oct 2009.

By Ken Kazinski (Kjkazinski) on Sunday, October 18, 2009 - 10:49 am: Edit

Deleted

By Ken Kazinski (Kjkazinski) on Monday, October 19, 2009 - 12:48 am: Edit

Paravian SLC (YR18.3A) - Y1 has the rule number but states it might be in a future product. This unit should be included in the Paravian Sublight listing, almost the same information as the WCL (YR18.3B), except product should be future/Y1 and it is a sublight ship. - Ken Kazinski, 20 Oct 2009.

By Jason E. Schaff (Jschaff297061) on Friday, November 13, 2009 - 05:12 pm: Edit

Romulan PHX (R4.49) - YIS is listed as Y184, but the text of R4.49 states that the Leviathan was converted as the second Phoenix in Y184, with the Gemini having been converted earlier. Suggest changing YIS to Y183, or possibly Y182. - Jason E. Schaff, 13 Nov 2009.

By Ken Kazinski (Kjkazinski) on Monday, November 16, 2009 - 11:27 pm: Edit

Federation FB-111 (R2.F16) - The type should be listed as FB-111 and not F-B111. - Ken Kazinski, 16 Nov 09.

Federation FB-111M (R2.F16) - The type should be listed as FB-111M and not F-B111M. - Ken Kazinski, 16 Nov 09.

Federation FB-111M (R2.F16) - Shouldn't the product should be listed as J2, the same as the FB-111 and not J? - Ken Kazinski, 16 Nov 09.

By Ken Kazinski (Kjkazinski) on Tuesday, November 17, 2009 - 12:04 am: Edit

Federation DNL (R2.95) - The Y2 note is in contradiction to the Y1 statement that "All size-2 ships are in this category, although not marked as such." The Y2 note should be deleted. - Ken Kazinski, 16 Nov 2009.

By Howard Bampton (Bampton) on Friday, November 27, 2009 - 11:47 pm: Edit

Annex #7S -R4.219 / Romulan FHF - R4.219 is the FHFX, not the FHF (R4.75). - Howard Bampton 27 Nov 2009

[posted in the wrong area the first time.]

By John Wyszynski (Starsabre) on Sunday, December 06, 2009 - 10:21 pm: Edit

Annex #8B - Fabrication is missing from the list. Many of the Jindarian SSD have option boxes which can be Fabrication; the SSD point to this annex for the cost. - John Wyszynski 6 Dec 2009

By Ken Kazinski (Kjkazinski) on Friday, December 11, 2009 - 12:37 am: Edit

Federation P-FCF (R2.101) - There should be a degree symbol after the size class (when detached). - Ken Kazinski, 10 Dec 2009.

Federation P-AVP (Future) - There should be a degree symbol after the size class (when detached). - Ken Kazinski, 10 Dec 2009.

By Ken Kazinski (Kjkazinski) on Friday, December 11, 2009 - 01:09 am: Edit

Federation P-FCF (R2.101) - Shouldn't this unit have the F-111 note, the same as the FCF. - Ken Kazinski, 10 Dec 2009.

By Ken Kazinski (Kjkazinski) on Friday, December 11, 2009 - 01:23 am: Edit

Federation P-FCF (R2.101) - Shouldn't this unit should have the Federation N1 note? - Ken Kazinski, 11 Dec 2009.

Federation FCF (R2.102) - Shouldn't this unit should have the Federation N1 note? - Ken Kazinski, 11 Dec 2009.

By Ken Kazinski (Kjkazinski) on Thursday, December 17, 2009 - 11:20 pm: Edit

What is the correct type for the Klingon bombers (ZB-1, ZB-2, Z-B3, Z-B4)? J2 page 28 shows Z-B1 and ZB-1 to Z-B4 and ZB-4. J2 SSD pg 24 shows ZB-1 to ZB-4.

By Ken Kazinski (Kjkazinski) on Monday, December 21, 2009 - 12:51 am: Edit

Romulan Glad-DM (R4.F9) - The product reference should be J2 and not J. - Ken Kazinski, 21 Dec 2009.

By Ken Kazinski (Kjkazinski) on Monday, December 21, 2009 - 01:23 am: Edit

Romulan CH-1 (R4.F11) - The type should be listed at CH-1 and not CH1. J2 SSD Book page 30 and J2 rules book page 30 show the type as CH-1. - Ken Kazinski, 21 Dec 2009.

Romulan CH-2 (R4.F12) - The type should be listed at CH-2 and not CH1. J2 SSD Book page 30 and J2 rules book page 30 show the type as CH-2. - Ken Kazinski, 21 Dec 2009.

Romulan CH-3 (R4.F13) - The type should be listed at CH-3 and not CH3. J2 SSD Book page 30 and J2 rules book page 30 show the type as CH-3. - Ken Kazinski, 21 Dec 2009.

Romulan CH-4 (R4.F14) - The type should be listed at CH-4 and not CH4. J2 SSD Book page 30 and J2 rules book page 30 show the type as CH-4. - Ken Kazinski, 21 Dec 2009.

By Ken Kazinski (Kjkazinski) on Monday, December 21, 2009 - 01:31 am: Edit

Romulan CH-1M (R4.F11) - The 2xPL-D drone reference should be removed. Per J16.249 megefighter systems do not add any weapons or pods to bombers. - Ken Kazinski, 21 Dec 2009.

By Ken Kazinski (Kjkazinski) on Monday, December 21, 2009 - 01:40 am: Edit

Romulan CH-2M (R4.F12) - The 4xPL-D drone reference should be 2xPL-D. Per J16.249 megefighter systems do not add any weapons or pods to bombers. - Ken Kazinski, 21 Dec 2009.

Romulan CH-3M (R4.F13) - The 4xPL-D drone reference should be 2xPL-D. Per J16.249 megefighter systems do not add any weapons or pods to bombers. - Ken Kazinski, 21 Dec 2009.

Romulan CH-4M (R4.F14) - The 6xPL-D drone reference should be 4xPL-D. Per J16.249 megefighter systems do not add any weapons or pods to bombers. - Ken Kazinski, 21 Dec 2009.

By Ken Kazinski (Kjkazinski) on Monday, December 21, 2009 - 12:38 pm: Edit

Sorry just noticed megefighter should be megafighter.

By Steve Petrick (Petrick) on Wednesday, December 23, 2009 - 05:35 pm: Edit

The following are listed to just to let people know I am looking at the reports in the topic. They also cite errors to help people in looking at things. The names of the submitters are deleted as there is no intention on my part to embarrass anyone who is taking the time to help make the next product better.

ANNEX #3: Federation: FCF (R2.102) - Shouldn't this unit should have the Federation N1 note? REPLY: This ship is a Fast Carrier Resupply Ship, not a normal carrier escort. Its cargo is not available to use the N1 note because its use as an escort is not its normal mission. For this same reason the FCR (R2.84) does not have the N1 note either.

ANNEX #3: Federation: P-FCF (R2.101) - Shouldn't this unit should have the Federation N1 note? REPLY: This pod is a Fast Carrier Resupply Pod, not a carrier escort pod. Its cargo is not available to use the N1 note. For this same reason the FCR (R2.84) does not have the N1 note either.

ANNEX #3: Orion Cartels: YLR (YR8.5) - The turn mode should be listed as "A" and not "AA." The SSD shows a turn mode of "A." REPLY: The SSD shows a turn mode of AA, you probably accidentally turned back to the YCR when reporting on the YLR.

By Steve Petrick (Petrick) on Wednesday, December 23, 2009 - 05:36 pm: Edit

I have placed all the reports in order, and have just one Annex #3 report currently outstanding. Most of the rest of the reports are on Annex #4, and I have not dealt with any of those. When I get all of the reports submitted to date done, I will see about getting them posted as a header to this topic so everyone can see what has been dealt with.

By Michael C. Grafton (Mike_Grafton) on Thursday, December 24, 2009 - 05:13 pm: Edit

When you "credit someone" for an idea who decides?

I probably am the one that suggested the F101, heavy superiority fighters plus the ADW. But lots of people input into the final discussiona so I can see how crediting many people would be difficult.

http://www.starfleetgames.com/discus/messages/12031/16773.html
http://www.starfleetgames.com/discus/messages/12031/19045.html?1196882643

Or is there more to it???