Archive through February 21, 2014

Star Fleet Universe Discussion Board: Star Fleet Battles: New Product Development: Module G4 Master Annexes: Archive through February 21, 2014
By Ken Kazinski (Kjkazinski) on Sunday, January 31, 2010 - 10:40 pm: Edit

ANNEX #4: General MRX-X (XJ8.1) - The produce should be X1 and not J2. - Ken Kazinski, 31 Jan 2010.

By Shawn Hantke (Shantke) on Wednesday, February 17, 2010 - 07:37 pm: Edit

ANNEX #3 Lyran R11.54 Space Control Ship Pallet (Pal-SC) suggest change to (Pal-SCS) so as not to be confused with R11.101 Scout Pallet (Pal-SC) - Shawn Hantke, 17 Feb 2010

By Shawn Hantke (Shantke) on Saturday, February 27, 2010 - 05:40 pm: Edit

R8.206 Orion Free-X-Traitor AND R8.206 Orion Advanced Technology Battle Raider (BRX) Same rule number used twice. - Shawn Hantke, 27 Feb 2010

By Shawn Hantke (Shantke) on Sunday, February 28, 2010 - 04:54 pm: Edit

R12.30 WYN KZINTI-TYPE DRONE FRIGATE (ZDF) R12.30 WYN AUXILIARY COMMANDO CRUISER (AxCC) Same rule number used twice. - Shawn Hantke, 28 Feb 2010

By Shawn Hantke (Shantke) on Sunday, February 28, 2010 - 04:56 pm: Edit

R12.45 WYN AUXILIARY BATTLE CONTROL SHIP (AxBS) R12.45 WYN WAR CRUISER ESCORT (CWE) Same rule number used twice. - Shawn Hantke, 28 Feb 2010

By Shawn Hantke (Shantke) on Sunday, February 28, 2010 - 04:58 pm: Edit

R12.205 WYN MAKO-X MPROVED DESTROYER (DDX)R12.205 WYN ADVANCED TECHNOLGY AUXILIARY BATTLECRUISER (ABX)Same rule number used twice. - Shawn Hantke, 28 Feb 2010

By Shawn Hantke (Shantke) on Sunday, February 28, 2010 - 04:59 pm: Edit

R12.206 WYN GREAT WHITE-X ADVANCED TECHNOLGY CRUISER (CAX) R12.206 WYN ORCA-X ADVANCED TECHNOLGY WAR CRUISER (CWX)Same rule number used twice. - Shawn Hantke, 28 Feb 2010

By Ken Kazinski (Kjkazinski) on Saturday, March 06, 2010 - 12:52 am: Edit

Romulan NHB (R4.102) - Shouldn't the NovaHawks BPV be 190/175? The NovaHawks base hull BPV is 155. The SPB modules should cost 35/20 (125/110 - 90). - Ken Kazinski, 6 Mar 2010.

By Ken Kazinski (Kjkazinski) on Monday, March 22, 2010 - 03:14 am: Edit

Tholian NCV (R7.77) - The YIS for this unit should be 186. This unit is made up of the SCoM (R7.66) module and the NCV Rear Hull (R7.77). The YIS for the SCoM is 186 while the YIS for the NCV Rear Hull is 180. - Ken Kazinski, 22 Mar 2010.

By Mike Kenyon (Mikek) on Thursday, May 13, 2010 - 01:14 pm: Edit

For the module list -- SL167 is listed in G3A as being Y66, it's Y68 in CL#18 where it's published. Neitehr year supports the ships involved, that given I'm assuming that the change of year was a typo in G3A.

By Thomas Mathews (Turtle) on Wednesday, June 23, 2010 - 12:39 pm: Edit

Klingon B9A stasis variant of B9 missing. Thomas Mathews 23 Jun 2010 I do not have the B9 SSD to know what values are changed from the B9. The B9A is listed on the F&E Klingon SIT. YIS would be Y175 same as the B9.

By Ken Kazinski (Kjkazinski) on Sunday, July 04, 2010 - 10:56 pm: Edit

Annex 3A Parvarian Pod Weights - The listing states there are no double or tripple weight pods but it does not state what the weight of a single weight pod is. The listing should probably state "All Parvaian are single weight with a towing cost of 0.2500 (or is it 0.3333)." - Ken Kazinski, 4 July 2010.

By Shawn Hantke (Shantke) on Thursday, January 20, 2011 - 07:26 pm: Edit

ANNEX #4 MASTER FIGHTER CHART R8.0 Orions, no listing. Suggest adding a note similar to R12.0 WYN Star Cluster mentioning they used other empires fighters with restrictions. S. Hantke 20 Jan 2011

By Stewart W Frazier (Frazikar2) on Tuesday, July 19, 2011 - 05:15 pm: Edit

Annex #4, Federation F16E, missing '2xEW Pod' in Other Weapons SWFrazier 110719

Annex #4, Federation F16EM, missing '2 extra pod rails' in Other Weapons SWFrazier 110719

Annex #4, Federation F20E, missing '2xEW Pod' in Other Weapons SWFrazier 110719

Annex #4, Federation F20EM, missing '2 extra pod rails' in Other Weapons SWFrazier 110719

By Mike West (Mjwest) on Saturday, August 20, 2011 - 12:30 am: Edit

Master Ship Chart, Seltorian CL: The notes section incorrectly lists the ship as "(HG: IMP)". It appears the 'cut-n-paste' got a little out of control, and the Seltorian CL was definitely allowed in the Home Galaxy. - Mike West 19-08-11

By Ken Kazinski (Kjkazinski) on Monday, June 25, 2012 - 06:24 pm: Edit

Annex 4, Federation B-52DM, the year should be 179 and not 178. - Ken Kazinski, 24 June 2012.

Annex 4, Federation F-16EpM - Per (J16.245) EW megafighters add 2xExtra Pod Rails. - Ken Kazinski, 24 June 2012.

Annex 4, Federation F-20E - Per (R1.F7) the F-20 falls in the Other/All category. As such it should have 2xExtra Pod Rails and not "-". - Ken Kazinski, 24 June 2012.

Annex 4, Federation F-20EM - Per (J16.245) the F-20EM should have an additional 2xExtra Pod Rails and not "2xEW Pod". - Ken Kazinski, 24 June 2012.

Annex 4, Federation FB-111p, the product should be CL39/J2. - Ken Kazinski, 24 June 2012.

Annex 4, Federation FB-111pM, the product should be CL39/J2. - Ken Kazinski, 24 June 2012.

Annex 4, Federation FB-111pM, The DFR should be -1 and not -3. - Ken Kazinski, 24 June 2012.

By Ken Kazinski (Kjkazinski) on Tuesday, June 26, 2012 - 02:04 am: Edit

Annex 4, Klingon Z-1DM. Per (J16.242) when this fighter is converted to a megafighter an additional charge for the disruptor should be added and not 2xI drones correct? Drones: 2xVI, Other Weapons: 1xDisr-FA, 2 Charges. - Ken Kazinski, 25 June 2012.

Annex 4, Klingon Z-1M. There are two listing for Z-1M. One is a megafighter and the other is from CL25. What should the designation for the CL25 Z-1M be? - Ken Kazinski, 25 June 2012.

By Ken Kazinski (Kjkazinski) on Friday, June 29, 2012 - 07:36 pm: Edit

Annex #4: Klingon Empire: Z-PM - Per (J16.241) when the Z-P was converted to the Z-PM 2xI drones should have been added. Drones

should be 2xI, 2xVI, - Ken Kazinski, 6/29/2012

ANNEX #4: Klingon Empire: Z-HBM - The reference should be F8 the same as the Z-HB. - Ken Kazinski, 6/29/2012.

By Ken Kazinski (Kjkazinski) on Monday, July 02, 2012 - 02:37 am: Edit

ANNEX #4: Romulan Empire: G-FE - Based on how I read R1.F7, when converting the G-F fighter, it would fall under the category of DRONE-Armed. From this, you would replace the 2xPL-D rails with 2xEW Pod, but I don't see why the 2xPL-K rails were added. - Ken Kazinski, 7/2/2012.

By Ken Kazinski (Kjkazinski) on Tuesday, July 03, 2012 - 02:13 am: Edit

ANNEX #4: Romulan Empire: G-IIM - As the G-II did not have any PL-D's there should only be 2xPL-D and not 4xPL-D. - Ken Kazinski, 7/2/2012.

ANNEX #4: Romulan Empire: G-III-KM - The reference should be J2 and not J, the same as the G-III-K. - Ken Kazinski, 7/2/2012.

ANNEX #4: Romulan Empire: Glad-D - The reference should be J2 and not J, the same as the Glad-D. - Ken Kazinski, 7/2/2012.

ANNEX #4: Romulan Empire: MLS-S - G3 shows the fighter to have 1xFLSR while Y3 shows the fighter to not have any lasers. I am assuming Y3 is correct as it was published after G3. - Ken Kazinski, 7/2/2012.

By Ken Kazinski (Kjkazinski) on Thursday, July 05, 2012 - 04:31 pm: Edit

Annex #4 - Kzinti SAS-EM, the fighter should have received 2xExtra Pod Rails and not 2xEW Pod. - Ken Kazinski, 7/4/2012.

Annex #4 - Gorn G-18EM, the fighter's BPV should be 18 and not 12. - Ken Kazinski, 7/4/2012.

Annex #4 - Tholian S-H (R7.F3) is listed in it's rule at SP-H. - Ken Kazinski, 7/4/2012.

Annex #4 - Tholian S-HM (R7.F3) is listed as S-HM and should be SP-HM. - Ken Kazinski, 7/4/2012.

Annex #4 - Tholian S-HP (R7.F8P) is listed as S-HP and should be SP-HP. - Ken Kazinski, 7/4/2012.

Annex #4 - Tholian S-HPM (R7.F3) is listed as S-HPM and should be SP-HPM. - Ken Kazinski, 7/4/2012.

By Nick Samaras (Koogie) on Tuesday, October 22, 2013 - 05:38 pm: Edit

Annex #3 Master Ship Chart
Tholian NBV should have note as Home Galaxy Impossible. (Nick Samaras, October 22, 2013)

Tholian NBS should have note as Home Galaxy Impossible. (Nick Samaras, October 22, 2013)

Tholian NSCS should have note as Home Galaxy Impossible. (Nick Samaras, October 22, 2013)

Tholian NCV should have note as Home Galaxy Impossible. (Nick Samaras, October 22, 2013)

Tholian NSR should have note as Home Galaxy Impossible. (Nick Samaras, October 22, 2013)

Tholian NRV should have note as Home Galaxy Impossible. (Nick Samaras, October 22, 2013)

Tholian NCX should have note as Home Galaxy Impossible. (Nick Samaras, October 22, 2013)

Tholian NLX should have note as Home Galaxy Impossible. (Nick Samaras, October 22, 2013)

Tholian ComX should have note as Home Galaxy Impossible. (Nick Samaras, October 22, 2013)

Tholian NBV-Rear hull should have note as Home Galaxy Impossible. (Nick Samaras, October 22, 2013)

Tholian NBS-Rear hull should have note as Home Galaxy Impossible. (Nick Samaras, October 22, 2013)

Tholian NLX-Rear hull is missing its entry (Nick Samaras, October 22, 2013)

Tholian NSCS-Rear hull should have note as Home Galaxy Impossible. (Nick Samaras, October 22, 2013)

Tholian NCV-Rear hull should have note as Home Galaxy Impossible. (Nick Samaras, October 22, 2013)

Tholian NSR-Rear hull should have note as Home Galaxy Impossible. (Nick Samaras, October 22, 2013)

Tholian NRV-Rear hull should have note as Home Galaxy Impossible. (Nick Samaras, October 22, 2013)

Tholian NTG-Rear hull should have note as Home Galaxy Impossible. (Nick Samaras, October 22, 2013)

Seltorian SC is listed as Home Galaxy Impossible, but these were sent on expeditions.(Nick Samaras, October 22, 2013)

LDR CDW status listed as Conjectural, should this be Unbuilt Variant instead? (Nick Samaras, October 22, 2013)

Annex 7N Drone Reloads
WYN FFE and CWE need to be included as they receive the same storage as the DDE(Nick Samaras, October 22, 2013)

By Nick Samaras (Koogie) on Wednesday, October 23, 2013 - 11:42 pm: Edit

ANNEX 3 MASTER SHIP CHARTS
Federation NCA saucer: Delete note that all NCA saucers are identical; they are not.(Nick Samaras, October 23, 2013)

Klingon D6 Boom note: Add note that the D6P, D6DP, UD7 booms are different as they have mech-link tractors.(Nick Samaras, October 23, 2013)

Gorn CVA: Should this unit be an Unbuilt variant instead of Conjectural?(Nick Samaras, October 23, 2013)

Gorn BCV: Should this unit be an Unbuilt variant instead of Conjectural?(Nick Samaras, October 23, 2013)

Gorn CVS: Should this unit be an Unbuilt variant instead of Conjectural?(Nick Samaras, October 23, 2013)

Kzinti P-YT5 Early Years Troop Pallet: Needs Gavity Landing note.(Nick Samaras, October 23, 2013)

Andromedan Starbase: More than one was built as per C5, no longer Unique.(Nick Samaras, October 23, 2013)

Hydran D7HX should be listed as Unbuilt Variant, not Unique. (Nick Samaras, October 23, 2013)

Lyran CVA: Should this unit be an Unbuilt variant instead of Conjectural?(Nick Samaras, October 23, 2013)

Lyran BCV: Should this unit be an Unbuilt variant instead of Conjectural?(Nick Samaras, October 23, 2013)

Lyran Space Control Pallet is listed as Unique, but Klingon and Kzinti versions are Limited Production (Nick Samaras, October 23, 2013)

Most Lyran K-Pods are listed as purchased, but they can build their own (Nick Samaras, October 23, 2013)

LDR K-Pods are listed as purchased, but they can build their own (Nick Samaras, October 23, 2013)

LDR CDW should be Unbuilt Variant, not Conjectural. 9Nick Samaras, October 23, 2013)

By Ken Kazinski (Kjkazinski) on Friday, February 21, 2014 - 11:01 am: Edit

(R1.68?) General S-ST (proposed) Small Shuttle Ducktail - This ducktail is shown in SFT #43 page 8. It has 1 double shuttle and 1 tractor, no crew, 3 BPV. - Ken Kazinski, 21 Feburary 2014

By Steven E. Ehrbar (See) on Friday, February 21, 2014 - 02:02 pm: Edit

Ken, that was published in R8 as (R1.69A), and is already in G3 as the S-DT.

Administrator's Control Panel -- Board Moderators Only
Administer Page | Delete Conversation | Close Conversation | Move Conversation