ISC plasma F fireing rate
Moderators: mjwest, Albiegamer
- pneumonic81
- Lieutenant Commander
- Posts: 275
- Joined: Fri May 23, 2008 9:30 pm
- Location: Austin TX
ISC plasma F fireing rate
I dont have this rule anyplace dispite having the ISC ships from the comms, can anyone tell me the fireing rate for the rear firing plasma clusters?
- pneumonic81
- Lieutenant Commander
- Posts: 275
- Joined: Fri May 23, 2008 9:30 pm
- Location: Austin TX
It was Communique #15.
Note that, when used Offensively (against ships), the launch rate is one Pl-F per SHIP, not per cluster. The Booster Zero rule was in error.
There is no limit on firing them Defensively, whether in the Offensive Fire Phase or the Defensive Fire Phase. (Other than whatever limits are imposed by them being Pl-F torpedoes.)
Note that, when used Offensively (against ships), the launch rate is one Pl-F per SHIP, not per cluster. The Booster Zero rule was in error.
There is no limit on firing them Defensively, whether in the Offensive Fire Phase or the Defensive Fire Phase. (Other than whatever limits are imposed by them being Pl-F torpedoes.)

Federation Commander Answer Guy
- pneumonic81
- Lieutenant Commander
- Posts: 275
- Joined: Fri May 23, 2008 9:30 pm
- Location: Austin TX
When the ISC (and their rear-firing Pl-F) were created, the Pl-D did not exist in the game. It is a completely open question if the ISC would have used Pl-D racks instead had they been in the game when the ISC were invented. The do, certainly, serve a very similar function. If they were used instead, I doubt there would be quite as many present, however.pinecone wrote:I was wondering if those "clusters" were just replacements for the PL-D that didn't exist at the time? In SFC 2 The ISC had PL-D.
That said, the opportunity was there when the Captain's Edition was created to make such a change and it was not taken. So, the rear-firing Pl-F remain.
They are what they are. (I seem to be saying this frequently, lately.

Federation Commander Answer Guy
What do you mean by there might not be as many present?mjwest wrote:When the ISC (and their rear-firing Pl-F) were created, the Pl-D did not exist in the game. It is a completely open question if the ISC would have used Pl-D racks instead had they been in the game when the ISC were invented. The do, certainly, serve a very similar function. If they were used instead, I doubt there would be quite as many present, however.pinecone wrote:I was wondering if those "clusters" were just replacements for the PL-D that didn't exist at the time? In SFC 2 The ISC had PL-D.
That said, the opportunity was there when the Captain's Edition was created to make such a change and it was not taken. So, the rear-firing Pl-F remain.
They are what they are. (I seem to be saying this frequently, lately.)
Oh, and you have been saying that alot
Just that an ISC CA has six rear-firing torpedoes. This is because they load slowly (once per three turns). If they used Pl-D racks instead, they might only have two racks, and certainly wouldn't have had more than four.pinecone wrote:What do you mean by there might not be as many present?

Federation Commander Answer Guy
- pneumonic81
- Lieutenant Commander
- Posts: 275
- Joined: Fri May 23, 2008 9:30 pm
- Location: Austin TX
Whats great about those rear firing plasma Fs is, its a great distraction when your trying to reload the ppd. What works for me is to come in on an oblique approach, fire the ppd at 15 the end of the turn and break off. if they pursue they gett o fly thru a plasma F as well. Some will do that, but most wont.
As ISC I often dance peoples shields right off with those PPDs, thing is we had a guy who thought he could fire tons of pl-F and so I needed to clarify that.
As ISC I often dance peoples shields right off with those PPDs, thing is we had a guy who thought he could fire tons of pl-F and so I needed to clarify that.
- pneumonic81
- Lieutenant Commander
- Posts: 275
- Joined: Fri May 23, 2008 9:30 pm
- Location: Austin TX