Question about Romulan Falcon
Moderators: mjwest, Albiegamer
-
wedge_hammersteel
- Commander
- Posts: 578
- Joined: Sat Sep 27, 2008 12:42 am
- Location: Lafayette, LA
Question about Romulan Falcon
I am looking for a ship card for the Falcon.
The miniature is listed in the store.
http://store.starfleetstore.com/merchan ... ry_Code=RM
However, the most recent ship card list shows the Falcon as a Mauler in Communique 18 and the miniature for future release.
Is the current Falcon mini going to be bashed to a mauler design?
If yes, then I assume there is no ship card for the regular Falcon? It would make for a good Communique ship card.
The miniature is listed in the store.
http://store.starfleetstore.com/merchan ... ry_Code=RM
However, the most recent ship card list shows the Falcon as a Mauler in Communique 18 and the miniature for future release.
Is the current Falcon mini going to be bashed to a mauler design?
If yes, then I assume there is no ship card for the regular Falcon? It would make for a good Communique ship card.
Burt:
Not sure what your question is.
The Falcon is a mauler ship... in fact, it's the original mauler.
Much as with the WarBird/WarEagle... the ship is built around the weapon.
The batteries, power connections and mauler cannon are contined within the body o the vessel. That's why there's not the outward appearance of the mauler as with the D6M / Terminator conversion where the mauler weapon was retro fitted to an existing ship.
Not sure what your question is.
The Falcon is a mauler ship... in fact, it's the original mauler.
Much as with the WarBird/WarEagle... the ship is built around the weapon.
The batteries, power connections and mauler cannon are contined within the body o the vessel. That's why there's not the outward appearance of the mauler as with the D6M / Terminator conversion where the mauler weapon was retro fitted to an existing ship.
Commander, Battlegroup Murfreesboro
Department Head, ACTASF
Department Head, ACTASF
-
wedge_hammersteel
- Commander
- Posts: 578
- Joined: Sat Sep 27, 2008 12:42 am
- Location: Lafayette, LA
- Dal Downing
- Commander
- Posts: 665
- Joined: Tue May 06, 2008 1:43 pm
- Location: Western Wisconsin
Still kinda hoping we will see a King Falcon Mauler someday. Basiclly apply to a Falcon what makes a King Eagle not a War Eagle. 2-15 Box Warp Engines with a Plasma F and a Phaser 3 each. Now that ship scares me more than any D6M ever could. The only thing more frieghtening is firing on a Terminator and not killing it.... 
-Dal
"Which one of you is the Biggest, Baddest, Bootlicker of the bunch?"
"I am."
"ARCHERS!!! THAT ONE!!!!"
"Which one of you is the Biggest, Baddest, Bootlicker of the bunch?"
"I am."
"ARCHERS!!! THAT ONE!!!!"
- Steve Cole
- Site Admin
- Posts: 3846
- Joined: Wed Oct 11, 2006 5:24 pm
- Dan Ibekwe
- Commander
- Posts: 449
- Joined: Thu Mar 08, 2007 6:06 pm
- Location: Manchester UK
- Steve Cole
- Site Admin
- Posts: 3846
- Joined: Wed Oct 11, 2006 5:24 pm
- Dan Ibekwe
- Commander
- Posts: 449
- Joined: Thu Mar 08, 2007 6:06 pm
- Location: Manchester UK
Oh. I thought the Falcon was built around the power system for the mauler.
Without all those batteries, you're going to have a lot of internal volume freed up.
Perhaps a fast transport, with customised assault ship or repair tender variants.
Or a MY Romulan attempt at a 'fast' - or at any rate, faster - cruiser: the empty volume remains empty, dropping move cost to 0.75, and the ship carries one Pl-G and six FA Ph-1s?
Trying to be creative...
Without all those batteries, you're going to have a lot of internal volume freed up.
Perhaps a fast transport, with customised assault ship or repair tender variants.
Or a MY Romulan attempt at a 'fast' - or at any rate, faster - cruiser: the empty volume remains empty, dropping move cost to 0.75, and the ship carries one Pl-G and six FA Ph-1s?
Trying to be creative...
We are Hydrans! NO ONE LIKES US!
-
wedge_hammersteel
- Commander
- Posts: 578
- Joined: Sat Sep 27, 2008 12:42 am
- Location: Lafayette, LA
How about making aCommando Cruiser variant for the Falcon?
Its pretty close in point value to the Klink Commando Cruiser. The battery bays would make nice barracks and cargo along with some extra shuttle bays and other missing systems. The power generation looks similar to the Klink Commando Cruiser too.
Its pretty close in point value to the Klink Commando Cruiser. The battery bays would make nice barracks and cargo along with some extra shuttle bays and other missing systems. The power generation looks similar to the Klink Commando Cruiser too.
-
Rosencrantz
- Ensign
- Posts: 3
- Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2012 5:49 pm
I doubt that old hull could take the stress of more than one R-Torp.archon96 wrote:maybe give it three r type plasma launchers and heavy forward shields to use against hardened sites like Battle Stations.
Now replacing the R torp with 2 S-torps could be useful, especially if you used enveloping torps on a base.
Isn't there a Sparrowhawk variant that has 3 S torps for use against bases?
Wont work.archon96 wrote:maybe give it three r type plasma launchers and heavy forward shields to use against hardened sites like Battle Stations.
The SFU flavor text for this ship describes the R launcher as being so largethe ship was effectively built around it.
Even with standardized parts and miniaturization - you're not going to get three R launchers inside a hull that size.
Commander, Battlegroup Murfreesboro
Department Head, ACTASF
Department Head, ACTASF



